The Effect of Gross Domestic Product, Interest Rates, Coupons, Maturities and Inflation on Yield to Maturity for the 2018-2022 Period
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/e-bisnis.v16i2.1202Keywords:
Inflasi, Maturitas, Kupon, Produk domestic bruto, Suku bunga, dan Yield To Maturity obligasiAbstract
The purpose of this study is to test whether Gross Domestic Product (GDP), interest rates, coupons, maturity and inflation affect the Yield To Maturity (YTM) of Government Bonds. The data used is the type of government bonds with Fixed Rate (FR) coupons denominated in Rupiah 2018 – 2022. The method used is a purposive sampling method, so that a sample of 23 FR series bonds is obtained. The type of research used is quantitative research, which is to prove the relationship between independent and dependent variables. The results of this study show that partially GDP does not have a positive effect on YTM, interest rates do not have a positive effect on YTM, coupons have a positive effect on YTM, maturity does not have a positive effect on YTM and inflation does not have a negative effect on YTM.
References
[2] O. A. Cahyono, E. Suryadi, and H. Safitri, “Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Obligasi Konvensional dan Obligasi Syariah Pada Obligasi Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2018-2020,” Jurnal Produktivitas: Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Muhammadiyah Pontianak, vol. 9, no. 1, 2022.
[3] E. Tandelilin, “Pasar modal manajemen portofolio & investasi,” Yogyakarta: PT Kanisius, 2017.
[4] D. Aulia, “Analisis Pengaruh Likuiditas, Faktor Fundamental Ekonomi Makro Dan Faktor Eksternal Terhadap Imbal Hasil Surat Utang Negara (Seri FR0031),” Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi Pembangunan, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 46–62, 2018.
[5] D. Y. Kamila, R. I. Tripalupi, and E. Afifah, “Pengaruh produk domestik bruto (PDB), inflasi dan kurs rupiah terhadap yield sukuk negara SR 009 periode 2017-2020,” LIKUID: Jurnal Ekonomi Industri Halal, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 44–58, 2021.
[6] M. Ningsih and K. Kardinal, “Pengaruh Produk Domestik Bruto (PDB), Tingkat Suku Bunga, Kupon, Jatuh Tempo Obligasi Terhadap Yield To Maturity (YTM) Obligasi Pemerintah Yang Terdaftar (BEI) Periode 2015-2019,” Publikasi Riset Mahasiswa Manajemen, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 172–177, 2022.
[7] A. Kurnianingsih, “FAKTOR MAKRO EKONOMI YANG MEMPENGARUHI PERTUMBUHAN YIELD OBLIGASI,” Jurnal Manajemen dan Retail, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 15–32, 2021.
[8] A. Nuratriningrum, M. D. Sukamto, and H. Komarudin, “Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Debt To Equity Ratio, Tingkat Suku Bunga, Peringkat Obligasi Terhadap Yield To Maturity (Ytm) Obligasi Perusahaan,” 2021.
[9] J. Latumaerissa, “Bank & lembaga keuangan lain: teori dan kebijakan,” 2017.
[10] H. Sipangkar and D. Silalahi, “PENGARUH PERINGKAT, KUPON, DAN SISA UMUR OBLIGASI TERHADAP YIELD TO MATURITY OBLIGASI YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA (BEI),” KUKIMA: Kumpulan Karya Ilmiah Manajemen, pp. 34–44, 2022.
[11] Y. Yuliah, L. Triana, and S. Suhandi, “FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI YIELD TO MATURITY OBLIGASSI KORPORASI,” Jurnal Ilmu Keuangan dan Perbankan (JIKA), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 99–116, 2020.
[12] E. Hasibuan, P. Marbun, and E. Tarigan, “The Effect of Maturity, Bond Rating and Debt To Equity Ratio on Bond Yield to Maturity at Commercial Banks Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange,” 2020. [Online]. Available: http://jurnalmahasiswa.uma.ac.id/index.php/jimbi
[13] L. N. Listiawati and V. S. Paramita, “Pengaruh tingkat suku bunga, inflasi, Debt to equity ratio, dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap yield obligasi pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di bursa efek Indonesia tahun 2010-2016,” Jurnal Manajemen, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 33–51, 2018.