Hukum Tentang Perkawinan (Perbandingan Antara Kuh Perdata Indonesia, Inggris Dan Amerika)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/perkara.v1i2.1463Keywords:
Comparative Law Regarding Marriage, Civil Code Of Indonesia, England, United States.Abstract
Laws regarding marriage are an important part of the legal system in various countries. In this context, this research aims to compare the laws regarding marriage in the Indonesian, British and American Civil Codes. The aim of this research is to analyze the differences and similarities in the legal regulation of marriage, including marriage requirements, the marriage process, and the rights and obligations of husband and wife in the three legal systems.
This research uses a comparative legal approach, by analyzing legal regulations, court decisions, and relevant legal literature from the three countries. The data sources used include legal regulations regarding marriage, related court decisions, as well as legal literature that reviews aspects of marriage law in Indonesia, England and America.
Data analysis was carried out by comparing the differences and similarities in marriage requirements, the marriage process, and the rights and obligations of married couples in the three countries. Factors such as religion, culture, and legal history will be considered in this comparative analysis.
The results of this study show significant differences in the legal arrangements for marriage between the three countries. For example, in the Indonesian Civil Code, marriage can be religious or civil, while in England and America, civil marriage is the only legally recognized form. Marriage requirements such as minimum age, parental consent, and conditions for same-sex marriage may also differ in the three countries.
References
Ali, Achmad. Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence) Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudence). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2010.
Ali, H. Zainuddin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
Ali, Mohammad Mahrus, dkk., Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Bersifat Konstitusional Bersyarat dan Memuat Norma Baru. (Jakarta: Kepaniteraan dan Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, 2014).
Amalia, M., Indah, R. H., Simanjuntak, M. M., Ramadhani, M., Maslul, S., Aryansah, J. E., ... & Tampubolon, M. (2022). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Get Press.
Amrullah, M. Arief. Politik Hukum Pidana: Dalam Rangka Perlindungan Korban Kejahatan Ekonomi di Bidang Perbankan. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2003.
Astawa, I Gde Pantja dan Suprin Na’a. Dinamika dan Ilmu Perundangundangan di Indonesia, Bandung: PT. Alumni, 2008.
Astomo, Putera. Ilmu Perundang-undangan: Teori dan Praktik di Indonesia. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2018. Agustine, Oly Viana. “Politik Hukum Perjanjian Perkawinan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor
/PUU-XIII/2015 Dalam Menciptakan Keharmonisan Perkawinan”, Jurnal Rechtvinding, Volume 6 Nomor 1 April 2017.
Alwino, Alfensius. ”Diskursus Mengenai Keadilan Sosial: Kajian Teori Keadilan Dalam Liberalisme Locke, Persamaan Marx, Dan Justice As Fairness Rawls”, Jurnal Melintas, Volume 32 Issue 3, 2016.
Dwisvimiar, Inge. ”Keadilan dalam Perspektif Hukum.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Volume 11 Nomor 3, 2011.
ROMDONI, M. (2018). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penetapan Ahli Waris Pengganti Menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam (Studi Analisa Penetapan PA Serang No. 148/Pdt. P/2012/PA. Srg) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri" Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin" Banten).
Setiawan, Y., & Subaidi, S. (2023). Perempuan dalam Keluarga: Tafsir Ulang Amina Wadud dan Khaled M. Abou El Fadl. PLEDOI (Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan), 2(2), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.56721/pledoi.v2i2.246
Widayati, W. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Dalam Negara Hukum Indonesia yang Demokratis. PLEDOI (Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan), 1(1), 19-31.
WN, S. F., Romdoni, M., & Nurdiansyah, R. (2023). Harta Bersama: Sebuah Penyelesaian Objek Sengketa Yang Berstatus Agunan Di Pengadilan Agama Serang. Yustitiabelen, 9(1), 1-23.
