Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Penegakan Hukum: Studi Empiris terhadap Kasus Kriminalisasi Aktivis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/perkara.v3i1.2342Keywords:
Legal Protection, Human Rights, Freedom of Expression, Legal Reform, Judicial SystemAbstract
The criminalization of activists in Indonesia remains a critical human rights issue, with legal regulations often used to suppress freedom of expression and civil liberties. Despite Indonesia’s commitment to human rights protection, repressive law enforcement practices indicate an imbalance between state interests and civil rights safeguards. This study analyzes how existing legal frameworks contribute to activist criminalization and assesses the effectiveness of legal protection mechanisms. Using a qualitative empirical approach, this study examines legal regulations, court rulings, and case studies of activist criminalization. Data were collected through interviews with activists, human rights lawyers, and legal scholars, supported by legal document analysis. Findings reveal that activist criminalization cases increased by 75% from 2018 to 2023, with 70% of targeted activists experiencing legal intimidation leading to job loss, psychological pressure, and social insecurity. Additionally, 90% of criminalized activists faced prolonged legal battles, with only 10% acquitted. Ambiguous legal provisions, particularly in the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) and the Criminal Code (KUHP), are frequently misused to silence activism. This study highlights the urgent need for inclusive legal reform and stricter oversight mechanisms to prevent the misuse of laws against civil society. The findings provide a foundation for future research and policy recommendations to strengthen human rights protections and ensure that legal instruments are not exploited to suppress activism.
References
Chaara, I., Falisse, J. B., & Moriceau, J. (2022). Does Legal Aid Improve Access to Justice in ‘Fragile’ Settings? Evidence from Burundi. Journal of Peace Research, 59(6), 810–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433211055633
Cheeseman, N., & Dodsworth, S. (2023). Defending Civic Space: When are Campaigns against Repressive Laws Successful? Journal of Development Studies, 59(5), 619–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2022.2162882
Dal, A., Nisbet, E. C., & Kamenchuk, O. (2023). Signaling Silence: Affective and Cognitive Responses to Risks of Online Activism About Corruption in an Authoritarian Context. New Media and Society, 25(3), 646–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221135861
Eboibi, F. E., & Richards, N. U. (2025). African’s Right to Use Cyberspace and the Imposition of Criminal Sanction: Rethinking Legislative Criminalization of Online Acts in Africa. Information & Communications Technology Law, 34(1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2024.2406680
Gultom, R., & Nainggolan, N. P. (2025). Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Tentang Kasus Kekerasan Terhadap Aktivitas Lingkungan. Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin, 3(1), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.53935/jim.v3.i1.36
Gustafsson, M. T., Schilling-Vacaflor, A., & Lenschow, A. (2023). The Politics of Supply Chain Regulations: Towards Foreign Corporate Accountability in the Area of Human Rights and the Environment? Regulation and Governance, 17(4), 853–869. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12526
Haddeland, H. B., & Franko, K. (2021). Between Legality and Legitimacy: The Courtroom as a Site of Resistance in the Criminalization of Migration. Punishment and Society, 24(4), 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474521996815
Lindt, A. (2023). The Dark Side of Judicialization: Criminalizing Mining Protests in Peru. Latin American Research Review, 58(2), 368–382. https://doi.org/10.1017/lar.2023.4
Masferrer, A. (2023). The Decline of Freedom of Expression and Social Vulnerability in Western democracy. In International Journal for the Semiotics of Law (Vol. 36, Issue 4). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-09990-1
Matthes, C. Y. (2022). Judges as Activists: How Polish Judges Mobilise to Defend the Rule of Law. East European Politics, 38(3), 468–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2022.2092843
Mudhoffir, A. M. (2023). The Limits of civil Society Activism in Indonesia: The Case of the Weakening of the KPK. Critical Asian Studies, 55(1), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2022.2123019
Nurlaili, S. A., & Prayoga, W. B. (2024). Dinamika Kebebasan Berpendapat: Kasus Penahanan Aktivis Lingkungan Karimunjawa dalam Konteks Kritik terhadap Tambak Ilegal. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 10(23), 640–652. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14574666
Priyatno, D., Kamilah, A., & Mulyana, A. (2023). Corporate Crime in Expropriating Land Rights Through Intimidation and Criminalization. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2187739. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2187739
Putra, R. K., Kriswandaru, A. S., & Imaliya, T. (2024). Kajian Hukum Tata Negara terkait Pembatasan Kebebasan Berpendapat di Media Sosial di Era Pandemi COVID-19: Pendekatan Deskriptif Kualitatif. Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Sosial, 2(4), 857–872. https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v2i4.2195
Rachidi, I., & Aballagh, A. (2023). Algeria’s Hirak: Fading Prospects for Democratisation? The Journal of North African Studies, 28(6), 1515–1537. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2023.2207230
Ressmy, S., Ningrat, C., & Nulhaqim, S. A. (2023). Pasal Karet UU ITE dan Peyelesaian Konflik Digital di Indonesia. Epistemik: Indonesian Journal of Social and Political Science, 4(2), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.57266/epistemik.v4i2.158
Selmini, R., & Di Ronco, A. (2023). The Criminalization of Dissent and Protest. Crime and Justice, 52(1), 197–231. https://doi.org/10.1086/727553
Spalding, R. J. (2023). The Politics of Implementation: Social Movements and Mining Policy Implementation in Guatemala. The Extractive Industries and Society, 13, 101216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101216
Tweneboa Kodua, L., Xiao, Y., Adjei, N. O., Asante, D., Ofosu, B. O., & Amankona, D. (2022). Barriers to Green Human Resources Management (GHRM) Implementation in Developing Countries. Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Cleaner Production, 340, 130671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130671
Van der Vet, F., & Sundstrom, L. M. I. (2023). Activists in international courts: Backlash, funding, and strategy in international legal mobilization. Law and Society Review, 57(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12648
Vegh Weis, V. (2023). What Does Lawfare Mean in Latin America? A New Framework for Understanding the Criminalization of Progressive Political. Punishment and Society, 25(4), 909–933. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745221116348
Vese, D. (2022). Governing Fake News: The Regulation of Social Media and the Right to Freedom of Expression in the Era of Emergency. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 13(3), 477–513. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2021.48
Wardana, A. (2023). A Quest for Agency in the Anthropocene: Law and Environmental Movements in Southeast Asia. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, 32(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12467
Wiratraman, H. P. (2022). Constitutional Struggles and the Court in Indonesia’s Turn to Authoritarian Politics. Federal Law Review, 50(3), 314–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0067205x221107404
Xu, Z., & Zhang, M. (2023). How News Media Visually Dehumanize Victims of Humanitarian Crises Through Framing Disparities: A Quantitative Comparative Analysis. International Communication Gazette, 86(8), 633–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485231216583
4.png)
