Reformasi Hukum Pidana dalam Menghadapi Kejahatan Transnasional: Studi Perbandingan Indonesia dan Uni Eropa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/perkara.v3i1.2344Keywords:
Transnational Crime, Extradition Mechanism, Judicial Cooperation, Legal Cooperation, International LawAbstract
Transnational crime has become an increasingly complex challenge due to globalization and technological advancements, requiring effective legal frameworks to address cross-border offenses. Indonesia's criminal law system faces significant weaknesses compared to the European Union (EU), particularly in extradition mechanisms, international cooperation, and regulatory harmonization. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of Indonesia's criminal law in combating transnational crime by comparing it with the legal framework of the EU. A comparative legal study approach was used, incorporating qualitative analysis of legal regulations, case studies, and interviews with legal practitioners and law enforcement officers. The study examined key aspects such as extradition policies, law enforcement capacity, and cross-border collaboration. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s extradition success rate remains at 45%, significantly lower than the EU's 85%, which benefits from the European Arrest Warrant (EAW). Furthermore, the average case resolution time in Indonesia is approximately 24 months, whereas in the EU, it is around 6 months due to more streamlined procedures. The research also highlights the need for Indonesia to strengthen its law enforcement agencies, as the limited use of digital forensic tools and artificial intelligence-based crime detection hinders investigative efficiency. This study contributes to the discourse on transnational crime by emphasizing the necessity for Indonesia to implement legal reforms that align with global standards, enhance technological adoption in law enforcement, and establish more robust international partnerships. Strengthening these areas will improve Indonesia’s ability to effectively address transnational crime and enhance its integration into the global legal framework.
References
Alsulami, H. (2022). Implementation Analysis of Reliable Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Models for Security Against Cyber-Crimes: Attacks, Tracebacks, Forensics and Solutions. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 100, 107870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.107870
Aprilion, A., & Murdani, A. D. (2024). The Role of the Indonesian Government in Mitigating Human Trafficking Cases through Social Media. Global Local Interactions: Journal of International Relations, 4(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.22219/GLI.V4I1.31604
Arias, E. D., & Johnson, P. L. (2023). The Implications of Illicit Networks for Changes in Anti-Narcotics Policies. Crime, Law and Social Change, 82(4), 845–865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-023-10125-7
Ariyaningsih, S., Andrianto, A. A., Kusuma, A. S., & Prastyanti, R. A. (2023). Korelasi Kejahatan Siber dengan Percepatan Digitalisasi di Indonesia. Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.56457/JJIH.V1I1.38
Chrisna, A., & Panjaitan, D. (2022). Harmonisasi Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2007 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang dengan Protokol Palermo dalam Perlindungan Perdagangan Orang di Indonesia. Jurnal Yustitia, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.62279/yustitia.v16i1.895
Faisal, Yanto, A., Rahayu, D. P., Haryadi, D., Darmawan, A., & Manik, J. D. N. (2024). Genuine Paradigm of Criminal Justice: Rethinking Penal reform Within Indonesia New Criminal Code. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2301634. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2301634
Fikri, A. M. (2024). Kebijakan Hukum dalam Pemberantasan Pelaku Online Romance Fraud di Ruang Maya. Urnal CIC Lembaga Riset Dan Konsultan Sosial, 6(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.51486/jbo.v6i2.219
Garcia-Segura, L. A. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Preventing Corporate Crime. Journal of Economic Criminology, 5, 100091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2024.100091
Gaviyau, W., & Sibindi, A. B. (2023). Global Anti-Money Laundering and Combating Terrorism Financing Regulatory Framework: A Critique. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(7), 100040. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16070313
Kelly, C. L. (2023). Rule of Law Approaches to Countering Transnational Organized Crime in Africa: Going Beyond Criminal Justice. Trends in Organized Crime, 26(4), 420–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-023-09503-3
Lubis, A. F., Hasibuan, K., & Andiani, P. (2023). Peran dan Tantangan Implementasi Hukum Internasional tentang Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Penanganan Kejahatan Terhadap Kemanusiaan. Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM Wara Sains, 2(10), 964–972. https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v2i10.708
Rachman, D. R., & Gaol, S. L. (2025). Peran Penyidik dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang (Studi Kasus di Wilayah Hukum Polres Metro Jakarta Barat Periode 1 Januari 2023 s/d 31 Desember 2023). Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.08221/lexlaguens.v3i1.100
Riani, N., & Ilmih, A. A. (2024). Membangun Tembok Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia di Era Kejahatan Lintas Negara. Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora, 2(4), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.59246/aladalah.v2i4.930
Russo, A., & Stambol, E. M. (2022). The External Dimension of the EU’s Fight Against Transnational Crime: Transferring Political Rationalities of Crime Control. Review of International Studies, 48(2), 326–345. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210521000358
Rusydi, M. T., Penelitian, A., & Kunci, K. (2025). Perbandingan Hukum Siber Indonesia dengan Negara ASEAN: Suatu Kajian Normatif: Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 8(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v8i1.6536
Senewe, E. V. T., Revivo, A., & Maramis, R. A. (2024). Strengthening National Regulations in Combating Cross-Border Trafficking: Empirical Approach and the Way Forward. Hasanuddin Law Review, 10(1), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v10i1.4879
Setiawan, D. A. (2024). Strategi Penanggulangan Kejahatan Ekonomi Berbasis Teknologi: Studi Komparatif Antara Indonesia, Amerika, dan Eropa. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 53(1), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.53.1.2024.78-89
Shellaker, M., Tong, S., & Swallow, P. (2024). UK–EU Law Enforcement Cooperation Post-Brexit: A UK Law Enforcement Practitioner Perspective. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 24(4), 841–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958231162520
Stuart S, Y. (2022). New Financial Action Task Force Recommendations to Fight Corruption and Money Laundering. Laws, 11(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11010008
Sundram, P. (2024). ASEAN Cooperation to Combat Transnational Crime: Progress, Perils, and Prospects. Frontiers in Political Science, 6, 1304828. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1304828
Tobing, C. I., Surya, T. M., Selvias, L. R., Girsang, S. R., Azzahra, P. B., Purba, L. Y., Putera, M. A., & Rusmana, N. (2024). Globalisasi Digital dan Cybercrime: Tantangan Hukum Dalam Menghadapi Kejahatan Siber Lintas Batas. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 10(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v10i2.3170
Wang, W., Bai, Y., Xu, J., & Li, T. (2025). Collaborative Governance of China-ASEAN Maritime Drug Control: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Improvements. Ocean & Coastal Management, 261, 107548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107548
Wicaksono, A. T., & Yasin, I. F. (2024). Criminal Law Reformulation Through Omnibus Law as a Solution to Sectoral Cyber Protection. Al-Jinayah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 10(2), 237–261. https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2024.10.2.237-261
Yeh, S. S. (2023). The Anticorruption Protocol to the United Nations Convention against Corruption Beneficial Owner Rule. Law2023, 12(6), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12060086
Zhafirah, P. D. (2024). Optimalisasi Diplomasi Internasional dalam Rangka Penanganan Kejahatan Transnasional Melalui Penguatan Atase. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(3), 14910–14920. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i3.12348
Zoumpoulakis, K. (2022). Approximation of Criminal Sanctions in the European Union: A Wild Goose Chase? New Journal of European Criminal Law, 13(3), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844221119732
4.png)
