Legal Barriers Affecting Decentralized Public Service Delivery in Rapidly Transforming Political Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/jqpxqv07Keywords:
Legal Barriers Decentralization , Public Service Delivery , Political Dynamics , Administrative LawAbstract
Public service delivery through decentralization is meant to improve administrative effectiveness, but its implementation still faces legal ambiguity amid a constantly evolving political landscape. This research study proposes to examine the impact of legal impediments on the efficiency of implementing the legal framework for public service delivery through decentralization. The research will make use of the normative-empirical legal methodological framework. This uses the doctrinal research method, drawing on data collected from 30 local officials who provide the service under the legal framework of decentralization. The findings indicate that legal barriers take three forms: normative barriers arising from unclear implementing rules, structural barriers stemming from overlapping central and local authority, and implementation barriers arising from risk-averse bureaucracy. These challenges are exacerbated by political dynamics, which increase the likelihood of legal uncertainty and, in turn, of ineffective service delivery. The project will therefore make a theoretical contribution to the literature on the role of legal barriers to decentralization, the political dynamics that mediate them, and the outcomes of decentralized governance. More specifically, it will underscore the importance of harmonizing regulations and strengthening legal frameworks to enhance legal certainty in decentralized public administration. Finally, it is concluded that legal barriers are crucial to ensuring the effectiveness and accountability of decentralization in public service delivery.
References
Allen, C., Malekpour, S., & Mintrom, M. (2023). Cross-scale, cross-level and multi-actor governance of transformations toward the Sustainable Development Goals: A review of common challenges and solutions. Sustainable Development, 31(3), 1250–1267. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2495
Andersson, C., Hallin, A., & Ivory, C. (2022). Unpacking the digitalisation of public services: Configuring work during automation in local government. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101662
Appermont, N. (2025). ‘A conceptual framework on legal complexity.’ Theory and Practice of Legislation, 13(2), 236–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2025.2515804
Asif, A., & Rathore, K. (2021). Behavioral Drivers of Performance in Public-Sector Organizations: A Literature Review. Sage Open, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244021989283
Bah, I., & Dossa, K. F. (2025). Land Governance in French-Speaking Africa: Comparative Analysis of Legal and Institutional Reforms for Sustainable Management of Community Lands. Land, 14(2), 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14020276
Bondy, A. S., Maggor, E., & Tassinari, A. (2025). Putting wage growth back on the table: Labour incorporation, political exchange, and wage-boosting policies in advanced peripheral economies. Competition and Change, 29(3–4), 437–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294241226733
Cantarelli, P., Belle, N., & Hall, J. L. (2023). Information use in public administration and policy decision-making: A research synthesis. Public Administration Review, 83(6), 1667–1686. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13735
Coban, M. K., & Apaydin, F. (2025). Navigating financial cycles: Economic growth, bureaucratic autonomy, and regulatory governance in emerging markets. Regulation and Governance, 19(1), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12621
Cohen, N. (2023). Public administration reform and political will in cases of political instability: Insights from the Israeli experience. Public Policy and Administration, 38(4), 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767221076059
Cucca, R., & Ranci, C. (2022). Urban Policy in Times of Crisis: The Policy Capacity of European Cities and the Role of Multi-Level Governance. Urban Affairs Review, 58(6), 1493–1522. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211041710
D’Alessio, I., Quaglieri, A., Burrai, J., Pizzo, A., Mari, E., Aitella, U., Lausi, G., Tagliaferri, G., Cordellieri, P., Giannini, A. M., & Cricenti, C. (2024). “Leading through Crisis”: A Systematic Review of Institutional Decision-Makers in Emergency Contexts. Behavioral Sciences, 14(6), 481. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14060481
Durán-Martínez, A., & Pennell, C. (2024). Change from Above or Pressure from Below? The Diffusion of Cannabis Reform in Latin America. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 43(5), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.13580
Elayah, M., Almaweri, A., & Alzandani, B. (2025). Navigating post-conflict governance in Yemen: Decentralization, federalism, and the path to stability. Development Policy Review, 43(5), e70024. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.70024
Faguet, J. P., & Shami, M. (2021). The Incoherence of Institutional Reform: Decentralization as a Structural Solution to Immediate Political Needs. Studies in Comparative International Development, 57, 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-021-09347-4
Feky, F. El, El Nemr, N., & Mousa, S. (2023). The Theoretical Impact of Fiscal Decentralisation on National Income Inequality: Does Quality of Governance Matter? International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 13(6), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.15118
Granqvist, K., Humer, A., & Mäntysalo, R. (2021). Tensions in city-regional spatial planning: the challenge of interpreting layered institutional rules. Regional Studies, 55(5), 844–856. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1707791
Hidayat, A. R., Hospes, O., & Termeer, C. J. A. M. (2025). Why Democratization and Decentralization in Indonesia Have Mixed Results on the Ground: A Systematic Literature Review. Public Administration and Development, 45(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2095
Johnsen, Å., Solholm, K., & Tufte, P. A. (2024). Performance Measurement System Design as Link Between Strategy Formulation and Performance Information Use in Public Sector Organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 47(4), 813–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2360158
Kleider, H., & Toubeau, S. (2022). Public policy in multi-level systems: A new research agenda for the study of regional-level policy. Regional and Federal Studies, 32(3), 277–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2021.2018681
Li, Y., Chen, S., & Peng, Y. (2023). In the Shadow of Administrative Decentralization: The Impact of Devolution on Subnational Service Provision. American Review of Public Administration, 53(7–8), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740231185849
Mendonça, A., Leal Filho, W., & Alves, F. (2023). Public participation and climate change governance: Between political approach and local actors’ perspective in two Macaronesian territories. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1094178. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1094178
Mladenović, M. N., & Haavisto, N. (2021). Interpretative flexibility and conflicts in the emergence of Mobility as a Service: Finnish public sector actor perspectives. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(2), 851–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.04.005
Mu, R., & Wang, H. (2022). A systematic literature review of open innovation in the public sector: comparing barriers and governance strategies of digital and non-digital open innovation. Public Management Review, 24(4), 489–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1838787
Nowak, M., Cotella, G., Przemysław´, P., & Przemysław´sleszy´nski, P. P. (2021). The Legal, Administrative, and Governance Frameworks of Spatial Policy, Planning, and Land Use: Interdependencies, Barriers, and Directions of Change. Land, 10(11), 1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111119
Paranata, A. (2025). A Systematic Literature Review of Anti-corruption Policy: A Future Research Agenda in Indonesia. Public Organization Review, 25, 1181–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-025-00847-8
Rasul, I., Rogger, D., & Williams, M. J. (2021). Management, Organizational Performance, and Task Clarity: Evidence from Ghana’s Civil Service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(2), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa034
Ruijer, E., Porumbescu, G., Porter, R., & Piotrowski, S. (2023). Social equity in the data era: A systematic literature review of data-driven public service research. Public Administration Review, 83(2), 316–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13585
Salvador, M., & Sancho, D. (2023). Local Governments Facing Turbulence: Robust Governance and Institutional Capacities. Social Sciences, 12(8), 462. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12080462
Schoderer, M., Karthe, D., Dombrowsky, I., & Dell’Angelo, J. (2021). Hydro-social dynamics of miningscapes: Obstacles to implementing water protection legislation in Mongolia. Journal of Environmental Management, 292, 112767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112767
Selten, F., & Klievink, B. (2024). Organizing public sector AI adoption: Navigating between separation and integration. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 101885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101885
Sibiya, N. P., Das, D. K., Vogel, C., Mazinyo, S. P., Zhou, L., Kalumba, M. A., Sithole, M., Adom, R. K., & Simatele, M. D. (2023). Overcoming Bureaucratic Resistance: An Analysis of Barriers to Climate Change Adaptation in South Africa. Climate, 11(7), 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11070145
Song, J., Sun, X., & Gao, C. (2025). Do public services affect economic growth? Evidence from China under the fiscal decentralization perspective. International Review of Economics & Finance, 102, 104378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104378
Song, W., & Zhao, K. (2024). Navigating the innovation policy dilemma: How subnational governments balance expenditure competition pressures and long-term innovation goals. Heliyon, 10(15), e34787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34787
Tan, E., Mahula, S., & Crompvoets, J. (2022). Blockchain governance in the public sector: A conceptual framework for public management. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101625
Wadipalapa, R. P., Katharina, R., Nainggolan, P. P., Aminah, S., Apriani, T., Ma’rifah, D., & Anisah, A. L. (2024). An Ambitious ArtificialIntelligence Policy in a Decentralised GovernanceSystem: Evidence FromIndonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 43(1), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034231226393
Zarychta, A., Benedum, M. E., Sanchez, E., & Andersson, K. P. (2023). Decentralization and Corruption in Public Service Delivery: Local Institutional Arrangements That Can Help Reduce Governance Risks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 34(2), 238–254. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muad022
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dian Karisma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
4.png)
