Legal Fragmentation in Regional Environmental Governance: Evaluating Decentralized Mining Policies in Indonesia

Maulana Fahmi  Idris

doi:10.51903/3jmwhf91

Authors

Maulana Fahmi Idris Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer, Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/3jmwhf91

Keywords:

Legal Fragmentation, Environmental Governance, Decentralized Mining, Multi-Level Governance

Abstract

Legal fragmentation has become a significant challenge in decentralized environmental governance, particularly within extractive sectors in developing countries. This study examines how decentralized mining policies in Indonesia generate regulatory fragmentation and influence environmental governance performance across multiple administrative levels. A qualitative comparative case study approach is employed to analyze mining governance dynamics in selected regions with varying institutional capacities. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, including government officials, environmental regulators, civil society organizations, and local communities, complemented by systematic analysis of policy documents and regulatory frameworks. The data were analyzed using thematic comparative analysis to identify patterns of regulatory overlap, authority conflict, and policy inconsistency. The findings indicate that decentralization in the mining sector produces structural fragmentation characterized by overlapping regulations, weak intergovernmental coordination, and inconsistent policy implementation. These conditions are reinforced by divergent institutional priorities, where regional governments prioritize economic development while central authorities emphasize regulatory control and environmental protection. Such misalignment contributes to governance inefficiency and increases environmental risk. This study contributes to Multi-Level Governance and Institutional Fragmentation Theory by demonstrating that legal fragmentation is not merely an administrative issue but a structural governance condition shaped by institutional design and political-economic incentives. A regulatory fragmentation framework is proposed to explain how multi-level governance misalignment affects environmental outcomes in extractive industries. The study concludes that improving environmental governance in decentralized mining systems requires integrated regulatory coordination and strengthened multi-level governance mechanisms rather than relying solely on centralization reforms.

References

Annahar, N., Widianingsih, I., Muhtar, E. A., & Paskarina, C. (2023). The Road to Inclusive Decentralized Village Governance in Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118616

Breul, M., & Atienza, M. (2022). Extractive industries and regional diversification: A multidimensional framework for diversification in mining regions. Extractive Industries and Society, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2022.101125

Chagnon, C. W., Durante, F., Gills, B. K., Hagolani-Albov, S. E., Hokkanen, S., Kangasluoma, S. M. J., Konttinen, H., Kröger, M., LaFleur, W., Ollinaho, O., & Vuola, M. P. S. (2022). From extractivism to global extractivism: the evolution of an organizing concept. Journal of Peasant Studies, 49(4), 760–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2069015

Eitan, A. (2025). Privatizing environmental governance: the evolving relationship between regulators and private entities. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2025.2576781

Elsässer, J. P. (2024). Managers of complex change? How United Nations treaty secretariats jointly govern institutional interplay in global environmental governance. Environmental Policy and Governance, 34(6), 610–622. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2105

Feng, Z., & Li, Y. (2024). Natural resource curse and fiscal decentralization: Exploring the mediating role of green innovations and market regulations in G-20 economies. Resources Policy, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104556

Ford, M., Hasbiyalloh, B., & Palmer, W. (2026). Unintended Consequences: The Impact of Policy Change on Indonesia’s Commercial Fishing Sector. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 62(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2025.2565147

Heinen, D., Arlati, A., & Knieling, J. (2022). Five dimensions of climate governance: a framework for empirical research based on polycentric and multi-level governance perspectives. Environmental Policy and Governance, 32(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1963

Ho, T. T., & Reksa, A. F. A. (2023). Environmental Policy in Indonesia from the Post-New Order Era to the Present: Positive Adjustments and Limitations. 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31252-6_14

Hubert Ta, L., & Campbell, B. (2023). Environmental protection in Madagascar: Biodiversity offsetting in the mining sector as a corporate social responsibility strategy. Extractive Industries and Society, 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101305

Jones, B., Nguyen-Tien, V., & Elliott, R. J. R. (2023). The electric vehicle revolution: Critical material supply chains, trade and development. World Economy, 46(1), 2–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13345

Karim, M. F., & Raharja, D. P. (2026). Certification as strategy: human rights, regulatory gaps, and foreign policy in Indonesia’s fight against IUU fishing. Contemporary Politics, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2026.2617400

Kuttu, S., Soku, M. G., Amidu, M., & Addo, D. A. A. (2026). The Impact of Corruption on Climate Change-Induced Vulnerability and Inequality. Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development, Part F1670, 621–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-15259-6_24

Luo, C., Liu, Y., Pan, L., & Yang, F. (2024). Navigating mineral policy development challenges in the global south using analytic hierarchy process. Resources Policy, 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104797

Meyer, K. Z., Luiz, J. M., & Fedderke, J. W. (2026). Corruption dynamics: Integrating structure, agency and institutional logics across contexts. International Journal of Management Reviews, 28(1), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12403

Moradi, M. A., & Jahanbakht, M. (2026). Institutional Governance and Entrepreneurship: A Multi-Branch Perspective on Policy Mixes in Emerging Economies. Administrative Sciences, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16020097

Mountford, N., & Cai, Y. (2023). Towards a flatter ontology of institutional logics: How logics relate in situations of institutional complexity. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25(2), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12313

Nagel, M., & Bravo-Laguna, C. (2022). Analyzing multi-level governance dynamics from a discourse network perspective: the debate over air pollution regulation in Germany. Environmental Sciences Europe, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00640-0

Narh, J. (2025). The resource curse and the role of institutions revisited. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(4), 8187–8207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04279-6

Ni, X., Wang, Z., Akbar, A., & Ali, S. (2022). Natural resources volatility, renewable energy, R&D resources and environment: Evidence from selected developed countries. Resources Policy, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102655

Nuur, C., Karabag, S. F., & Feldmann, A. (2026). Circular economy in the extractive frontier: Tensions and pathways for transformative change in mining. Extractive Industries and Society, 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2025.101764

Putri, E. I. K., Dharmawan, A. H., Hospes, O., Yulian, B. E., Amalia, R., Mardiyaningsih, D. I., Kinseng, R. A., Tonny, F., Pramudya, E. P., Rahmadian, F., & Suradiredja, D. Y. (2022). The Oil Palm Governance: Challenges of Sustainability Policy in Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031820

Rahimi, M., Ghorbani, M., & Azadi, H. (2023). Structural characteristics of governmental and non-governmental institutions network: case of water governance system in Kor River basin in Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(7), 7029–7045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02346-y

Rojas, L., Yepes, V., & Garcia, J. (2025). Complex Dynamics and Intelligent Control: Advances, Challenges, and Applications in Mining and Industrial Processes. Mathematics, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/math13060961

Setiawan, A., Tjiptoherijanto, P., Mahi, B. R., & Khoirunurrofik, K. (2022). The Impact of Local Government Capacity on Public Service Delivery: Lessons Learned from Decentralized Indonesia. Economies, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10120323

Shen, W. (2026). Chinese investments in the Democratic Republic of Congo’s critical minerals sector: adapting to the emerging neo-extractivism strategy. Extractive Industries and Society, 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2026.101934

Streit, S., Passarella, M., & Tost, M. (2025). The influence of environmental policies on mineral permitting in Europe: Challenges and insights from Spain and Sweden. Extractive Industries and Society, 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2025.101727

Sun, L., & Hasi, M. (2024). Effects of mining sector FDI, environmental regulations, and economic complexity, on mineral resource dependency in selected OECD countries. Resources Policy, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104651

Tang, Y., & Imran, M. (2024). Trade-offs and synergies: Examining the impact of natural resource rents and energy efficiency on financial development in the RCEP context. Natural Resources Forum. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12561

Tobing-David, V. E., Adi, I. R., & Nuryana, M. (2024). Conditions of Sustainable Welfare: A Cross-Case Empirical Analysis of 22 Locality-Based Welfare Systems in Decentralised Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041629

Wong, N. W. M. (2025). Bridging the Divide: Revisiting the Discrepancy Between Policy and Practice in Environmental Management in the Context of Asia. Asian Politics and Policy, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.70013

Xiao, M., Zhan, X., & Cudennec, A. (2025). Coping With Competing Institutional Logics in Policy Implementation. Governance, 38(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70036