SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN REKOMENDASI PEMBELIAN LAPTOP MENGGUNAKAN METODE FUZZY DAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/elkom.v16i2.1422Keywords:
DSS, FUZZY, SAWAbstract
In buying a laptop, you need to look at the specifications and standards that are tailored to your needs and requirements. Some of the standards and requirements include looking at several aspects of the criteria including the price of the laptop, RAM (random access memory), processor, hard drive capacity, screen size, VGA (video graphic adapter), battery power, weight, length of warranty, availability of spare parts, service range center. The fuzzy method is a method that makes it easy to find a value that is still vague and also linguistic, the use of the sample additive weighting (SAW) method is used to assist calculations in supporting decision making. The choice of using the SAW method is simpler in calculations, but the results of the calculations are accurate. From the results of calculations using the SAW method, it is calculated that between laptop 1 to laptop 7 with a price preference weight of 30, RAM 10, processor 10, hard disk capacity 10, screen size 5, VGA 3 (video graphic adapter), battery power 7, weight 5 , length of warranty 10, availability of spare parts 5, distance to service center 5, the highest order starts from laptop 1 with a total value of 18.4, laptop 7 with a value of 16.6, laptop 6 with a value of 13.6, laptop 5 with a value of 13.5, laptop 3 with a value of 13.2, laptop 4 with a value of 11.2, laptop 2 with a value of 8.9. The results of the assessment can change according to the needs of laptop buyers, who are more concerned with which criterion has the most important weight.
References
[2] W. N. Fadillah, M. H. Al-Areef, and J. Khatulistiwa, “Terbit online pada laman web jurnal: https://ejurnalunsam.id/index.php/jicom/ SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN UNTUK MEMILIH LAPTOP IDEAL DENGAN METODE SAW”, [Online]. Available: https://ejurnalunsam.id/index.php/jicom/
[3] H. Kristanto and H. Pudjoprastyono, “Pengaruh Kualitas Produk dan Citra Merek terhadap Minat Beli Laptop Acer pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Pembangunan Nasional ‘Veteran’ Jawa Timur,” Jurnal STEI Ekonomi, vol. 30, no. 02, pp. 11–19, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.36406/jemi.v30i02.462.
[4] H. Hertyana, E. Mufida, and A. Al Kaafi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Laptop Dengan Menggunakan Metode Topsis,” 2021.
[5] Y. Murdianingsih and I. Isbahatunnisa, “IMPLEMENTASI METODE FUZZY TAHANI DALAM MENENTUKAN REKOMENDASI PEMBELIAN LAPTOP (Studi kasus di Toko Mega Alvindo Kalijati Subang),” 2020.
[6] M. Yusuf Mappeasse and I. Suhardi, “Penentuan Laptop Bekas yang Berkualitas untuk Dunia Pendidikan dengan Metode Fuzzy Mamdani.”
[7] M. Redy Hermawan and R. Alam, “KLIK: Kajian Ilmiah Informatika dan Komputer Logika Fuzzy Mamdani Untuk Mendukung Keputusan Pembelian Laptop Asus M409BA Berdasarkan Spesifikasi Yang Tersedia,” Media Online), vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 99–103, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://djournals.com/klik
[8] A. W. Syahroni and S. Rachmatullah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Laptop pada Toko Online dengan Metode Fuzzy Tahani,” Jurnal & Penelitian Teknik Informatika, vol. 3, no. 1, 2018.
[9] E. Triswanto, M. Kom, K. Widhiyanti, S. Kom, and M. Cs, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi Pemilihan Laptop Menggunakan Fuzzy Tahani.”
[10] M. R. Firdaus and N. Nuraeni, “PEMILIHAN LAPTOP TERBAIK MENGGUNAKAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING,” Jurnal Informatika dan Komputer), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 218–222, 2022.
[11] A. Rijal Baihaqy, Y. Nurdiansyah, and M. A. Hidayat, “Penentuan Prioritas Pengerjaan Servis Telepon Seluler Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” Muhammad Arief Hidayat.
[12] D. Mulyadi et al., “Penerapan Fuzzy Logic untuk Sistem Pengendali Lalu Lintas,” vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 2622–4615, 2021, doi: 10.32493/informatika.v6i3.11575.
[13] J. Y. Marpaung, G. L. Ginting, and N. Silalahi, “Penerapan Metode Fuzzy Tsukamoto Dalam Penentuan Harga Laptop Bekas,” Technology and Science (BITS, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 115–126, 2020.
[14] D. Novianti, A. Bayu, and H. Yanto, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemilihan Laptop Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Studi Kasus: Seven Computech),” 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.nusamandiri.ac.id/http://www.bsi.ac.id
[15] “23-saw”.
[16] P. Karyawan, B. Berbasis, W. T. Kurnialensya, and Y. Fitrianto, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Dalam,” Jurnal Manajemen Sosial Ekonomi (DINAMIKA), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 65–81, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://journal.stiestekom.ac.id/index.php/dinamika■page65
[17] L. N. Sukaryati, A. Voutama, U. S. Karawang, and J. H. Ronggo, “PENERAPAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING PADA SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN UNTUK MEMILIH KARYAWAN TERBAIK,” Jurnal Ilmiah MATRIK, vol. 24, no. 3, p. 2022.
[18] F. Rukhiyati, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Tunjangan Pegawai Dengan Metode SAW Studi Kasus ( PT Pos Yogyakarta),” Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi Bisnis, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 268–275, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.47233/jteksis.v4i2.493.
[19] Jovanica and Erick Dazki, “KOMPARASI METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING (SAW) DENGAN WEIGHTED PRODUCT (WP) UNTUK PENILAIAN TENAGA KERJA INDONESIA,” JSiI (Jurnal Sistem Informasi), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 132–140, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.30656/jsii.v9i2.5066.
