Persepsi Stakeholders In Judgemnt Mahasiswa Akuntansi Universitas Nusa Cendana terhadap Pencegahan Fraud Dalam Layanan Pendidikan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/e-bisnis.v19i1.3412Keywords:
Student Perception; Stakeholders in Judgment; Academic Fraud PreventionAbstract
This study aims to determine whether fraud in academic education is a problem that can disrupt the integrity and quality of higher education. Therefore, effective prevention efforts are needed through strengthening the perception and ethical assessment of students as stakeholders in judgment. This study aims to analyze the influence of student perceptions of stakeholders in judgment on fraud prevention in academic education. This study uses a quantitative approach with a survey method of 55 students of Nusa Cendana University. Data were collected through questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive statistics, validity and reliability tests, classical assumption tests, simple linear regression analysis, t-tests, and coefficients of determination. The results show that student perceptions of stakeholders in judgment have a positive and significant effect on academic fraud prevention. The coefficient of determination (R Square) value of 0.504 indicates that student perceptions are able to explain 50.4% of the variation in fraud prevention. This study emphasizes the importance of strengthening academic ethics and integrity as a fraud prevention strategy in the higher education environment).
References
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (n.d.). Definition of Fraud ACFE.
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other People’s Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hadi, S. (2016). Persepsi Mahasiswa terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 21(2), 123–134.
Kusuma, H., & Mulyani, S. D. (2018). Pengaruh Tekanan, Kesempatan, dan Rasionalisasi terhadap Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pendidikan, 7(1), 1–10.
Murdock, H., Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C. (2004). Predictors of Cheating Among Early Adolescents: Academic and Social Motivations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(4), 457–475.
Nuraini, & Sugiyanto. (2019). Persepsi Mahasiswa terhadap Etika Akademik dan Pencegahan Fraud. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 10(2), 254–268.
Pamungkas, I. D., & Ardiyanto, M. D. (2020). Fraud Triangle dan Kecurangan Akademik: Studi Empiris pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 24(3), 387–399.
Sari, R. N., & Nugroho, P. S. (2017). Pengaruh Integritas dan Lingkungan Akademik terhadap Pencegahan Kecurangan Akademik. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 15(1), 55–66.
Widodo, A., & Putri, A. R. (2021). Pencegahan Fraud Akademik melalui Budaya Etika Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan Tinggi dan Kebijakan Publik, 5(2), 89–102.
