The Effect of AI Identity Threat on Psychological Distress, Mediated by Cognitive Job Insecurity, Among Freelance Graphic Designers in Bandung
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/e-bisnis.v19i1.4022Keywords:
AI Identity Threat, Cognitive Job Insecurity, Psychological Distress, Freelancer Graphic Desainer, SEM-PLSAbstract
The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has posed an identity threat to creative workers, including freelance graphic designers who lack the structural protections inherent in formal employment. This study aims to analyze the effect of AI Identity Threat on Psychological Distress, with Cognitive Job Insecurity as a mediating variable, among freelance graphic designers in Bandung. Utilizing an explanatory quantitative approach with a cross-sectional design, data were collected via an online questionnaire from 145 respondents selected through a purposive sampling technique. The data were subsequently analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling based on Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) via SmartPLS 4. The results indicate that AI Identity Threat has a positive and significant effect on Cognitive Job Insecurity ($\beta$ = 0.636; $p$ < 0.05). Furthermore, Cognitive Job Insecurity has a positive and significant effect on Psychological Distress ($\beta$ = 0.496; $p$ < 0.05), and AI Identity Threat exerts a direct positive and significant effect on Psychological Distress ($\beta$ = 0.204; $p$ < 0.05). The mediation analysis reveals that Cognitive Job Insecurity partially mediates the effect of AI Identity Threat on Psychological Distress ($\beta$ = 0.316; $p$ < 0.05). These findings confirm that the psychological impact of AI-driven identity threats on creative freelancers is predominantly channeled through cognitive evaluations of job sustainability, aligning with the perspective of Social Identity Theory.
References
BEKRAF. (2019). Data statistik dan hasil survei khusus ekonomi kreatif 2018. Badan Ekonomi Kreatif Republik Indonesia.
Bérastégui, P. (2021). Exposure to psychosocial risk factors in the gig economy: A systematic review (ETUI Research Paper – Report 2021.01). European Trade Union Institute.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Craig, K., Thatcher, J. B., & Grover, V. (2019). The IT identity threat: A conceptual definition and operational measure. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(1), 259–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1550561
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
De Witte, H. (2000). Arbeidsethos en jobonzekerheid: Meting en gevolgen voor welzijn, tevredenheid en inzet op het werk [Work ethic and job insecurity: Measurement and consequences for well-being, satisfaction, and work effort]. Dalam R. Bouwen, K. De Witte, H. De Witte, & T. Taillieu (Eds.), Van groep naar gemeenschap (pp. 325–350). Garant.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Goldberg, D., & Hillier, V. F. (1979). A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 9(1), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700021644
Goldberg, D. P., & Williams, P. (1988). A user's guide to the General Health Questionnaire. NFER-Nelson.
GoodStats. (2024). Survei persepsi masyarakat terhadap dampak kecerdasan buatan pada pekerjaan. GoodStats.
Greenhalgh, L., & Rosenblatt, Z. (1984). Job insecurity: Toward conceptual clarity. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 438–448. https://doi.org/10.2307/258284
Gull, A., Ashfaq, J., & Aslam, M. (2023). AI in the workplace: Uncovering its impact on employee well-being and the role of cognitive job insecurity. International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs, 8(4), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.24088/IJBEA-2023-84007
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400101
Lysyakov, M., & Viswanathan, S. (2023). Threatened by AI: Analyzing users' responses to the introduction of AI in a crowd-sourcing platform. Information Systems Research, 34(3), 1191–1210. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.1184
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH. https://www.smartpls.com
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (7th ed.). Wiley.
Shoss, M. K. (2017). Job insecurity: An integrative review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1911–1939. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317691574
Singarimbun, M., & Effendi, S. (2008). Metode penelitian survai. LP3ES.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sutherland, W., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.004
