Kedudukan Suntik Mati Terhadap Terpidana Mati Dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia
Abstract
The aim of this research is to legally analyze the procedures for implementing the death penalty in Indonesia from a human rights perspective. Apart from that, it discusses the type of execution of the death penalty by injection by considering the method of carrying out the death penalty against the perception of justice and humanity. The type of research used by researchers in preparing this research based on the phenomenon being studied is juridical research or normative legal research. The method used uses 2 types of approaches, namely using a statutory approach or what can be called a Statue Approach and a Conceptual Approach.The results of the research show that the existence of the death penalty, which is a very frightening type of crime, raises pros and cons in society, so that the electability of the death penalty is debated to this day. However, it is not only about the existence of the death penalty but the implementation/method used in the execution of death row convicts, carried out by being shot to death, is regulated in Law No/2 Presidential Decree of 1964 concerning procedures for carrying out the death penalty which is considered to be torturous and it looks very cruel, in contrast to countries that have implemented executions using lethal injection which is considered an easier method. This is based on the purpose of euthanasia (lethal injection), namely a way to end a person's life in a peaceful and painless way.
References
Artiono, Yon. Aku Menolak Hukuman Mati. Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia, 2012.
Barda, Mauladi dan. Teori-Teori Dan Kebijakan Pidana. bandung: alumni, 1992. Diantha, I Made Pasek. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi
Teori Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2016.
Efendi J,. Ibrahim, J., & Rijadi, P. Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Empiris. depok: Prenada Media Group, 2016.
Hardianto, Danang, and Paramita Prananingtiyas. “Jurnal Law Reform Volume 11, Nomor 1, Tahun 2015 Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.” Jurnal Law Reform Volume 11, no. 2 (2015): .
Hutapea, Bungsana. Kontroversi Penjatuhan Hukuman Mati Terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika Dalam Prespektif Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia.Jakarta: Tim Pohon Cahaya., 2016.
Hutapea, Bungsana. Kontroversi Penjatuhan Hukuman Mati Terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika Dalam Prespektif Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia.
Jakarta: Tim Pohon Cahaya., 2016.
Kadir, Husin, and Budi Riski Husin. SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA. Edited by Dessy Marliani Listianingsih. 1st ed. Jakarta Timur: Sinar Grafika, 2016. www. bumiaksara.com.
Kenedi, John. No Title. Edited by Sirajuddin. 2017th ed. yogyakarta: Pustaka belajar, 2017.
lyas, Amir. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Mahakarya Rangkang offset, 2012.
Mamudji, Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri. Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2013.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2017.
Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan EmpIrIs. Yogyakarta: pustaka pelajar, 2010.
NURWAHIDAH, NURWAHIDAH. “Eksekusi Hukuman Mati Di Indonesia (Tinjauan Hukum Pidana Islam).” Syariah Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran 14, no. 1 (2014): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.18592/syariah.v14i1.65.
Smith, Rhona K.M., Njäl Høstmælingen Christian, Christian Ranheim, Satya Arinanto, Fajrul Falaakh, Enny Soeprapto, Ifdhal Kasim, et al. “Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Materi.” Universitas Esa Unggul, 2018,
Sumaryanto, A Joko. Buku Ajar Hukum Pidana. Surabaya: CV.Jakad Media Publishing, 2019
Jurnal
Anjari, Warih. “Penjatuhan Pidana Mati Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal Widya Yustisia 1, no. 2 (2015): .
Arief, Amelia. “PROBLEMATIKA PENJATUHAN HUKUMAN PIDANA MATI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA DAN HUKUM
PIDANA.” KOSMETIK HUKUM 19 (2019):
Badu, Lisnawati. “Euthanasia Dan Hak Asasi Manusia (2012.” Jurnal Legalitas, 2012,
Bahiej, Ahmad. “Sejarah Dan Problematika Hukum Pidana Materiel Di Indonesia.” Sosio-Religia 5, no. 2 (2006):
Bing, Zou. “On the Standardization of Lethal Injections In ChinaAsian Social Scrience” 8 (2012):
Budiman, Adhigama Andre, Iftitahsari, and Maidina Rahmawti. “Laporan Situasi Kebijakan Pidana Mati Di Indonesia 2021 ‘Ketidakpastian Berlapis: Menanti Jaminan Komutasi Pidana Mati Sekarang!’” Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, 2022,
Damar, A A I, Permata Hati, Ni Putu, Rai Yuliartini, Dewa Gede, and Sudika Mangku. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terkait Permohonan Suntik Mati (Euthanasia) Ditinjau Dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia 2, no. 2 (2020): 134–44. Https://ejournal.undIksha.ac.Id/Index.php/ jatayu/article/view/28779.
Eddyono, Supriyadi W. Update Hukuman Mati Di Indonesia. Jurnal Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR, 2016
Perundang –Undangan
Undang-Undang Dasar 1945
Undang –Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2005 Tentang Pengesahan International Convenant On Civil And Political Right (Konvenan Internasional tentang Hak-Hak Sipil dan Politik)
Undang-Undang No/2 Penetapan Presiden No 2 Tahun 1964 Tentang Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Hukuman Mati yang di Jatuhkan Oleh Pengadilan di Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Militer
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
Internet/ website
AMR. “Jaksa Agung Dan IDI Sepakati Eksekusi Mati Dengan Jarum Suntik.” HUKUM ONLINE, 2005. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/jaksa- agung-dan-idi-sepakati-eksekusi-mati-dengan-jarum-suntik-hol12893/.
Auli, Renata Christha. “Pengertian Ham Menurut Para Ahli, Hukum Nasional Dan Internasional,” 2022. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/pengertian
–ham- menurut-para-ahli-hukum-nasional-dan-internasional-lt6331716e60 d8d
“Death Penalty Information Center.” DEATH PENALTY INFORMATION CENTER, 2022. https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/about/about-us.
4.png)
