Revitalisasi Peran Bawaslu Sebagai Lembaga Quasi-Judicial Dalam Menyelesaikan Pelanggaran Administrasi Pemilu

Authors

  • Dimas Yoga Adhi Prabawa Universitas Darul Ulum Islamic Centre Sudirman (UNDARIS)
  • Tri Susilowati Universitas Darul Ulum Islamic Centre Sudirman (UNDARIS)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/perkara.v1i4.1492

Keywords:

BAWASLU, elections, quasi-judicial institutions

Abstract

Elections are a means of popular sovereignty to elect members of the People's Representative Council, members of the Regional Representative Council, the President and Vice President, and to elect members of the Regional People's Representative Council, which are carried out directly, publicly, freely, secretly, honestly and fairly in the Unitary Republic of Indonesia. Indonesia is based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. As an electoral contestation, elections certainly have various kinds of potential violations in their implementation. One of the violations that has the greatest potential to occur is administrative violations. This article aims to analyze the revitalization of BAWASLU's role as a quasi-judicial institution in resolving election administration violations. The method used is descriptive analysis method.

This article shows that Bawaslu is a quasi-judicial institution in elections which has the authority to handle election violations after determining the national election results. The authority to handle election violations after the determination of election results nationally, in this case is limited to administrative election violations. The authority to handle election violations after the determination of election results nationally, in this case is limited to administrative election violations. The authority of Bawaslu, of course, cannot be ignored. Moreover, currently Indonesia is starting to implement simultaneous elections. The implementation of the election mechanism simultaneously and in a short time will of course have implications for the process that occurs in the election.

References

Afifuddin, M. 2020. Membumikan Pengawasan Pemilu. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2006. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sekretaris Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2013. Hitam Putih Pengadilan Khusus. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.

Islamy, M. Irfan. 2018. Kebijakan Publik. Tangerang Selatan: Universitas Terbuka.Moh. Saleh, Hufron, dan Syofyan Hadi, “Kewenangan Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum dalam Mengadili Sengketa Proses Pemilu dan Pelanggaran Administratif Pemilu”, Voice Justisia - Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 5 No. 5 (2021).

Muhammad Muhtarom, “Perkembangan Lembaga Peradilan Indonesia Di Era Reformasi”, Isharqi, Vol. IV No. 2 (2008).

Pratama, Ibnu Rizky. "Pembatasan Permohonan Pembatalan Penetapan Hasil Penghitungan Suara Pemilihan Kepala Daerah." Jurist-Diction Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021).

Putusan MK Nomor 20/PHP.BUP-XIX/2021

Downloads

Published

2023-11-20

How to Cite

Dimas Yoga Adhi Prabawa, & Tri Susilowati. (2023). Revitalisasi Peran Bawaslu Sebagai Lembaga Quasi-Judicial Dalam Menyelesaikan Pelanggaran Administrasi Pemilu. Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 1(4), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.51903/perkara.v1i4.1492

Most read articles by the same author(s)