Sanksi bagi Penyelenggara Pinjaman Daring Legal yang Tidak Mematuhi Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan

Authors

  • Suzette Hattingh Akobiarek Fakultas Hukum (Kampus Kota Surabaya) Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Kristantika Renata Pungus Fakultas Hukum (Kampus Kota surabaya) Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Rico Arden Kusuma Fakultas Hukum (Kampus Kota surabaya) Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Christopher Alexius Alfa Mulya Fakultas Hukum (Kampus Kota surabaya) Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Ivana Aprilia Fakultas Hukum (Kampus Kota surabaya) Universitas Pelita Harapan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/jaksa.v3i2.2487

Keywords:

Legal Online Loans, OJK, Punishment

Abstract

Legal online loan services (Pindar) are growing rapidly in Indonesia as an alternative financing solution that is easily accessible to the public. However, along with this growth, various violations have emerged by licensed operators, especially in billing practices that are not in accordance with the provisions of the Financial Services Authority (OJK). This research aims to analyze the regulations that must be complied with by legal pindar operators in accordance with POJK Number 40 of 2024 and examine the sanctions that can be imposed for violations of these regulations. The method used for this research are normative juridical with a statutory approach and a case approach. Data was obtained through literature studies from various regulations and legal literature. The results of the study show that the organizer is obliged to comply with the operational, administrative, and ethical billing provisions set by the OJK. In the event of a violation, the OJK can impose administrative sanctions, ranging from written warnings, freezing or restricting business activities, to the revocation of operational licenses. This research provides a theoretical contribution by clarifying the legal obligations of the organizer and adding to the legal literature regarding the supervision of the fintech lending sector. Practically, the results of this study are important for regulators in enforcing compliance and improving protection for the pindar service user community. The results of the study show that there are still rampant violations committed by the organizers, despite administrative sanctions given by the OJK, ranging from written warnings, freezing of business activities, fines, to revocation of operational permits. This shows that the strengthening of regulations has not been fully accompanied by the discipline of business actors in complying with the rules.

References

Adela Pitri Yani Dewi, & Taun. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Sistem Perjanjian Pinjaman Online Berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, Januari, 9(2), 7–13.

Ansa, C. B., Tampanguma, M. Y., & Pati, N. V. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Debitur Pinjaman Online Berdasarkan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sam Ratulangi, XIII(1), 1–14.

BBC New. (2023, September 22). Pinjol AdaKami diduga teror nasabah karena terlambat bayar cicilan - “Saya dibilang anak haram, orangtua dimaki dengan kasar.” BBC New Indonesia. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/cz986dygeeyo

Didi Kurniawan. (2025, February 21). OJK: Ada 13.540 Aduan soal Perilaku Petugas Penagih Utang Sejak 2024. VOI MEDIA. https://voi.id/ekonomi/462102/ojk-ada-13-540-aduan-soal-perilaku-petugas-penagih-utang-sejak-2024#:~:text=Otoritas%20Jasa%20Keuangan%20(OJK)%20mencatat%20terdapat%2013.540,berdasarkan%20layanan%20konsumen%20yang%20diterima%20oleh%20otoritas.

Hengki Heriyadi. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Peran dan Fungsi Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Dalam Sistem Keuangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 11(1), 36–44.

Hukum Online. (2025, March 13). POJK 40/2024 Gantikan Aturan Lama LPBBTI: Apa yang Harus Diketahui Pelaku Usaha? Hukumonline.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/pojk-40-2024-gantikan-aturan-lama-lpbbti--apa-yang-harus-diketahui-pelaku-usaha-lt67d2895f5a515/

Hutagalung, H. B. (2024). Regulasi dan Implementasi Peer To Peer Lending di Indonesia. Jurnal Darma Agung, 6, 441–451. https://doi.org/10.46930/ojsuda.v32i6.5187

I Dewa Gede Atmadja dan I Nyoman Putu Budiartha. (2018). Teori-Teori Hukum. Setara Press, 205.

Kiki Safitri & Erlangga Djumena. (2023, October 31). Ini Alasan OJK Kenakan Sanksi kepada Akulaku. Kompas.Com. https://money.kompas.com/read/2023/10/31/063300626/ini-alasan-ojk-kenakan-sanksi-kepada-akulaku

Kompas. (2024, December 18). OJK Beberkan Alasan & Tujuan Ubah Sebutan Pinjol Menjadi Pindar. Kontan.Co.Id. https://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/ojk-beberkan-alasan-tujuan-ubah-sebutan-pinjol-menjadi-pindar

Kristina. (2021, October 16). Apa itu Pinjol Resmi? Ini Sejarah Munculnya di Indonesia . Detikedu. https://www.detik.com/edu/detikpedia/d-5768994/apa-itu-pinjol-resmi-ini-sejarah-munculnya-di-indonesia

Mentari Puspadini. (2024, December 16). Pinjol Resmi Ganti Nama Jadi Pindar, Ini Harapan OJK. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20241216170719-17-596431/pinjol-resmi-ganti-nama-jadi-pindar-ini-harapan-ojk

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2025, March 6). Penyelenggara Fintech Lending Berizin di OJK per 31 Januari 2025. https://ojk.go.id/id/kanal/iknb/data-dan-statistik/direktori/fintech/Pages/Penyelenggara-Fintech-Lending-Berizin-di-OJK-per-31-Januari-2025.aspx

Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2024 Tentang Layanan Pendanaan Bersama Berbasis Teknologi Informasi, Pub. L. No. 40, 1 (2024). https://ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Documents/Pages/POJK-40-Tahun-2024-Layanan-Pendanaan-Bersama-Berbasis-Teknologi-Informasi/POJK%2040%20Tahun%202024%20Layanan%20Pendanaan%20Bersama%20Berbasis%20Teknologi%20Informasi.pdf

Downloads

Published

2025-04-29

How to Cite

Sanksi bagi Penyelenggara Pinjaman Daring Legal yang Tidak Mematuhi Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2025). Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 3(2), 01-12. https://doi.org/10.51903/jaksa.v3i2.2487