Persaingan Ekonomi Global: Implikasi Hukum dari Perang Dagang Amerika Serikat-China terhadap Negara Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/5yxpew42Keywords:
Implikasi hukum, Perang dagang Amerika Serikat-China, Perdagangan internasional, Perjanjian perdagangan regional (RCEP), Stabilitas ekonomiAbstract
The trade war between the United States and China, which began in 2018, has significantly affected the global economic landscape, particularly for developing countries such as Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the legal implications of the trade war on the international trade system and Indonesia’s legal position. The research applies a normative juridical method, examining key instruments including the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994, the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU), Law No. 7 of 2014 on Trade, and Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation. The findings reveal that the trade war undermines the effectiveness of the WTO's dispute-resolution mechanisms (Articles XXIII of the GATT and Article 3 of the DSU) in protecting developing countries. Indonesia has legal opportunities to strengthen its trade position through market diversification (RCEP and CEPA), enhanced anti-dumping policies, and proactive engagement in multilateral trade diplomacy. The study concludes that Indonesia must reinforce its international trade legal framework and national competitiveness to adapt to the ongoing global trade tensions.
References
Ade, A. (2019). “Gara-gara Perang Dagang, Pertumbuhan Ekonomi ASEAN Termasuk Indonesia Dipangkas”. https://insight.kontan.co.id/news/gara-gara-perang-dagang-pertumbuhan-ekonomi-asean-termasuk-indonesia-dipangkas
Ayu, Z. (2024). "Perdagangan Internasional: Peran Indonesia dalam WTO dan Menavigasi Era Liberalisme Ekonomi". https://www.kompasiana.com/zarinaay/65f3f359c57afb377b521428/perdagangan-internasional-peran-indonesia-dalam-wto-dan-menavigasi-era-liberalisme-ekonomi
Heriani, F. N. (2025). “WTO Putuskan UE Diskriminasi, Indonesia Menangkan Sengketa Dagang Kelapa Sawit”. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/wto-putuskan-ue-diskriminasi--indonesia-menangkan-sengketa-dagang-kelapa-sawit-lt67921aeeb4bb5/
Nugroho, H. (2023). “Peran WTO dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Perdagangan Internasional: Perspektif Negara Berkembang.” Jurnal Hukum Internasional Indonesia, 20(2), 145–162.
Olivia, G. (2019). “Risiko Meningkat, Ekonomi ASEAN+3 Diproyeksi Melambat di 2019”. https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/risiko-meningkat-ekonomi-asean3-diproyeksi-melambat-di-2019
Revo, M. (2025). “Perang Dagang China vs AS Makin Panas, Seberapa Buruk Dampak ke RI?”. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/research/20250411151916-128-625275/perang-dagang-china-vs-as-makin-panas-seberapa-buruk-dampak-ke-ri
Rahmawati, A. (2022). “Implikasi Perang Dagang AS–China terhadap Stabilitas Ekonomi ASEAN: Tinjauan Hukum Perdagangan Internasional.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Ekonomi Global, 7(1), 33–49.
Kapardis, A. (2023). Psychology and law. In Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 2882–2889. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_108.pdf
Pangestu, T., & Hanifa, M. (2024). Determinan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Dalam Membayar Pajak Sesuai Dengan Omzet Yang Didapatkan Untuk Usaha Mikro, Kecil, Dan Menengah. Neraca: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 2(6), 377-396.
Santika, I., & Sunariyanti, I. (2024). Hubungan Antara Masifnya Fenomena Korupsi Dengan Kesadaran Pajak Warga Negara Indonesia. JOCER: Journal of Civic Education Research, 2(1), 15–21.
Santoso, J. T., Kom, S., Kom, M., Wibowo, A., & Si, M. (2024). Hukum Pajak.
Van Krieken, R. (2023). Refeudalization and Law: From the Rule of Law to Ties of Allegiance. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 19, 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-LAWSOCSCI-111522-075848
Wibowo, A., & Listyarini, D. (2023). Hukum Pemerintah.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nurfauzi Muhammad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
6.png)
