Challenges of Civil Law Enforcement on Smart Contracts in Cross-Border Transactions Based on Blockchain Technology

Authors

  • Nadia Indah Safitri Universita Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Septiana Rossa Universita Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/wq4a7j50

Keywords:

Smart Contract, Blockchain , International Civil Law, Enforceability, Dispute Resolution

Abstract

With advances in blockchain technology, smart contracts have emerged as automated digital instruments for cross-border transactions. Yet, their automation and rigidity do create serious hindrances to civil law's fundamental principles, especially in terms of enforceability and dispute resolution. This research seeks to study discrepancies between the characteristics of smart contracts themselves and international civil law systems, and to unveil the legal obstacles on their path to implementation. By employing a normative juridical approach and comparative analysis from 50 legal and academic documents sourced from Indonesia, the United States, and the European Union, this research reveals regulatory divergences and the absence of a harmonized international standard. Results show that the European Union is far ahead of the United States and Indonesia in regulatory preparedness. Essentially, this research proposes a hybrid legal system, which is a combination of national and international provisions (for example, the UNCITRAL Model Law) for the establishment of blockchain-based digital dispute resolution. The outcome enlarges the horizon of digital contract law theory and serves as a handy guide for policymakers in managing legal complexities of smart contracts across jurisdictions.

 

References

Ahmed Abdulkhudhur Jasim. (2024). Enforcement of smart contracts in cross-jurisdictional transactions. International Journal of Law and Management, (December). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-06-2024-0220

Andrade, C., & Matias, M. (2022). Work-related ICT use during off-job time, technology to family conflict and segmentation preference: a study with two generations of employees. Information Communication and Society, 25(14), 2162–2171. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1933564

Bassan, F., & Rabitti, M. (2024). From smart legal contracts to contracts on blockchain: An empirical investigation. Computer Law and Security Review, 55(September), 106035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106035

Bayram, A. B., & Miller, B. (2023). Influencing Enforcement: The Application of International Law in Independent Judiciaries—The Case of the Alien Tort Statute. Political Research Quarterly, 76(4), 1959–1972. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129231185596

Chanuka Wijayakoon et al. (2025). Legal Compliance Evaluation of Smart Contracts Generated By Large Language Models. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00943

Harvey, C. R., & Rabetti, D. (2024). International business and decentralized finance. Journal of International Business Studies, 55(7), 840–863. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-024-00705-7

Heidari, S., Hashemi, S., & Khorsand, M. (2024). Towards Standardized Regulations for Blockchain Smart Contracts: Insights From Delphi and Swara Analysis. Amity Journal of Management, XI(II), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.31620/ajm.12.23/02

Helen Eenmaa et al. (2022). Machines that make and keep promises - Lessons for contract automation from algorithmic trading on financial markets. Computer Law and Security Review, 46(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105717

Ildar Begishev et al. (2023). Journal of Digital Technologies and Law. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law …, 1(June). https://doi.org/10.21202/2949-2483.2023.2

Kang, K. (2023). On contingency, confidence, and trust: how international water law stabilizes expectations under conditions of uncertainty. Water International, 48(6), 688–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2023.2257557

Khuan, H., Wulandari, Y. N., & Sothy, C. (2025). Smart Contracts and Their Implications for Conventional Contract Law. Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law, 3(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.70177/rjl.v3i1.2067

Kiskis, M. (2024). Private law framework for blockchain. Frontiers in Blockchain, 7(April), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2024.1205461

Kostina Prifti et al. (2024). Regulation by Design: Features, Practices, Limitations, and Governance Implications. Minds and Machines, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-024-09675-z

Kuo, C. C., & Shyu, J. Z. (2021). A cross-national comparative policy analysis of the blockchain technology between the USA and China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126893

Lee, L. (2024). Examining the Legal Status of Digital Assets as Property: A Comparative Analysis of Jurisdictional Approaches. SSRN Electronic Journal, (2022), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4807135

Maruf Ahmed Mridul et al. (2024). Smart Contracts, Smarter Payments: Innovating Cross-Border Payments and Reporting Transactions. 2024 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering and Economics, CIFEr 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIFER62890.2024.10772792

Omar Farouk Al Mashhour et al. (2023). Legal and Regulatory Aspects of Smart Contracts: A Systematic Review. Eurasian Journal of Management & Social Sciences, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.23918/ejmss.v4i2p156

Osborne, S. (2024). Smart contracts, the legal profession, and COVID-19: Highlighting the need to embrace technology. Accounting and Finance, 64(3), 3013–3028. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13244

Salger, C. (2024). Decentralized Dispute Resolution: Using Blockchain Technology and Smart Contracts in Arbitration. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, 24(1), 65.

Salsabila, C. P., & Kurniasari, E. (2023). Legal Protection of Smart Contract in Indonesia With Reference To Dutch Law. Student Journal of International Law, 3(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.24815/sjil.v3i1.27219

Sammu, J., & Joy, J. (2024). Cross-Border Regulatory Harmonization for Global Digital Financial Services, (November).

Schrama, R. (2023). Expert network interaction in the European Medicines Agency. Regulation and Governance, 17(2), 491–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12466

Sillanpää, T. M. (2020). Freedom to ( Smart ) Contract : The Myth of Code and Blockchain Governance Law Overview : Smart Contracts vs The Legal System. IALS Student Law Review, 7(2), 38–50. Retrieved from https://journals.sas.ac.uk/lawreview/article/view/5203/5054

Srinivas Parinandi et al. (2024). Investigating the politics and content of US State artificial intelligence legislation. Business and Politics, 26(2), 240–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2023.40

Taeihagh, A. (2023). Addressing Policy Challenges of Disruptive Technologies. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 26(3), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2023.2238867

Taherdoost, H. (2023). Smart Contracts in Blockchain Technology: A Critical Review. Information (Switzerland), 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/info14020117

Tauda, G. A., Omara, A., & Arnone, G. (2023). Cryptocurrency: Highlighting the Approach, Regulations, and Protection in Indonesia and the European Union. Bestuur, 11(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v11i1.67125

The, R., & For, R. (2024). B RIDGING THE G LOBAL D IVIDE IN AI R EGULATION : A P ROPOSAL FOR A C ONTEXTUAL, C OHERENT, AND C OMMENSURABLE F RAMEWORK Sangchul Park * Abstract : As debates on potential societal harm from artificial intelligence ( AI ) culminate in legislation and i, 1–58.

Vatiero, M. (2022). Smart contracts vs incomplete contracts: A transaction cost economics viewpoint. Computer Law and Security Review, 46(July), 105710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105710

Yin, B. (2025). Legal Analysis and Rule Construction of Smart Contracts. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 178(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.22517

Yusuf, A., & Martinez, R. (2025). Smart Contracts and Legal Enforceability: Decoding the Political Philosophy of Code as Law. Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics, 4(2), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.isslp.4.2.25

Zhuk, A. (2025). Beyond the blockchain hype: addressing legal and regulatory challenges. SN Social Sciences, 5(2), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-024-01044-y

Downloads

Published

2025-10-10

How to Cite

Challenges of Civil Law Enforcement on Smart Contracts in Cross-Border Transactions Based on Blockchain Technology. (2025). Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 3(4), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.51903/wq4a7j50