Evaluasi Kebijakan Pajak Pertambahan Nilai dengan Menggunakan Persepektif Publik Digital dalam Kerangka Public Value
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/vcjgky02Keywords:
public perspective, policy evaluation, public value, Value Added TaxAbstract
The policy to increase the Value Added Tax (VAT) rate to 12%, as stipulated in Law Number 7 of 2021 on the Harmonization of Tax Regulations, has generated diverse public responses, particularly regarding its impact on purchasing power, fiscal fairness, and policy legitimacy. This study aims to analyze public perceptions of the 12% VAT policy and assess the formation of public value using the Public Value framework. The research employs a mixed-methods approach with concurrent triangulation, combining quantitative sentiment analysis with qualitative content analysis of secondary data derived from public comments on Instagram. The findings indicate that public perception is predominantly negative, reflecting a low level of perceived policy value. Qualitative analysis further reveals that the VAT 12% policy is perceived as weak across the three dimensions of Public Value: policy benefits (value), legitimacy and public support (legitimacy and support), and governmental operational capacity (operational capabilities). The study concludes that the success of fiscal policy depends not only on legal validity and revenue objectives but also on the government’s ability to deliver tangible benefits, secure social legitimacy, and ensure effective implementation. Accordingly, this research recommends strengthening policy communication strategies, enhancing transparency and public participation, and improving economic mitigation mechanisms to increase public value and societal acceptance of the VAT 12% policy
References
Battista, A., & Torre, D. (2023). Mixed Methods Research Designs. Medical Teacher, 45(6), 585–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2023.2200118
Betke, M., & Wu, Z. (2022). Evaluation Criteria. In Data Association for Multi-Object Visual Tracking (pp. 29–35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01816-9_4
Bojang, M. B. S. (2021). Public Value Management: An Emerging Paradigm in Public Administration. International Journal of Business, Management and Economics, 2(4), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.47747/ijbme.v2i4.395
Devano, M. H., & Siregar, P. A. S. (2024). Pengaturan Prinsip Kehati-hatian dalam Pengelolaan Emisi Karbon di Indonesia. Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 2(1), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.51903/jaksa.v2i1.1509
Fadhilah, A., Fitriani, S. D., & Enjellika, J. Z. (2025). Pengaruh Kenaikan Tarif Pajak Pertambahan Nilai (PPn) terhadap Inflasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Cendekia Akuntansi, 10(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.32503/cendekiaakuntansi.v10i1.6634
Fathoni, M. I. (2025). Indonesia’s Value Added Tax (VAT) Reform: Fiscal Benefits and Sectoral Impacts. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 6(1), 530–548. https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v6i1.2039
Hanafi, S. (2023). Konsep Idealisasi Penegakan Hukum Pajak dengan Eliminasi Administrative Penal Law terhadap Pelanggaran Pajak di Indonesia. Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 1(4), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.51903/jaksa.v1i4.1400
Hariani, A., & Seventeen, W. L. (2025). Analisis Pengaruh Perubahan PPN 12% terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Keuangan dan Perpajakan, 1(3), 261–264. https://doi.org/10.62379/jakp.v1i3.186
Heliany, I. (2021). Peran Kebijakan Fiskal dalam Mengatasi Resesi Ekonomi di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar STIAMI, 8(1), 15–21. https://ojs.stiami.ac.id/index.php/PS/article/view/1362
Indonesia, R. (2021). Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 tentang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/175407/uu-no-7-tahun-2021
Kawar, L. N., Dunbar, G. B., Aquino Maneja, E. M., Flores, S. L., Squier, V. R., & Failla, K. R. (2024). Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, and Triangulation Research Simplified. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 55(7), 338–344. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124 20240328 03
Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2023). Qualitative Content Analysis: Methods, Practice and Software. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/qualitative-content-analysis-2-282907
Li, H., Chen, Q., Zhong, Z., Gong, R., & Han, G. (2022). E Word of Mouth Sentiment Analysis for User Behavior Studies. Information Processing & Management, 59(1), 102784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102784
Ligthart, A., Catal, C., & Tekinerdogan, B. (2021). Systematic Reviews in Sentiment Analysis: A Tertiary Study. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54(7), 4997–5053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-09973-3
Miles, D. A. (2017). A Taxonomy of Research Gaps: Identifying and Defining the Seven Research Gaps. In Doctoral Student Workshop: Finding Research Gaps Research Methods and Strategies (pp. 1–15). Dallas, Texas. https://www.academia.edu/35505149/article_research_methods_and_strategies_workshop_a_taxonomy_of_research_gaps_identifying_and_defining_the_seven_research_gaps
Moore, M. H. (2021). Creating Public Value: The Core Idea of Strategic Management in Government. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 6(1), e219. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2021.v6i1.219
Nabatchi, T. (2018). Public Values Frames in Administration and Governance. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvx009
Nulhakim, R. F., & Shiddieq, D. F. (2025). Analisis Sentimen Publik X Terhadap Kenaikkan Ppn 12% pada Twitter Menggunakan Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(8), 4090–4103. https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v6i8.8544
O’Flynn, J. (2021). Where to for Public Value? Taking Stock and Moving On. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(10), 867–877. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1884696
OECD. (2020). Improving Governance With Policy Evaluation: Lessons From Country Experiences. OECD Public Governance Reviews. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/89b1577d-en
Qinayya, S. A., Reyhanif, A. A., Nugroho, D. D., & Maulana, M. B. A. (2024). Perlindungan Hak Wajib Pajak dalam Proses Pemeriksaan dan Penegakan Hukum Pajak di Indonesia Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum Dan Etika. Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 2(3), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.51903/jaksa.v2i3.1886
Ricardo, M., & Tambunan, M. R. U. D. (2024). Tantangan dan Strategi Penerapan Kebijakan Tarif PPN 12%. Costing: Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting, 7(5), 11917. https://doi.org/10.31539/costing.v7i5.11917
Subur, H., & Syata, W. M. (2024). Analisis Dampak Kenaikan Tarif Pajak Pertambahan Nilai (PPN) Terhadap Masyarakat dan Inflasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Rumpun Manajemen dan Ekonomi, 1(5), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.61722/jrme.v1i5.3045
Taherdoost, H. (2022). What Are Different Research Approaches? Comprehensive Review of Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Research, Their Applications, Types, and Limitations. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 5(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v5i1.4538
Tan, K. L., Lee, C. P., & Lim, K. M. (2023). A Survey of Sentiment Analysis: Approaches, Datasets, and Future Research. Applied Sciences, 13(7), 4550. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13074550
Torfing, J., Ferlie, E., Jukić, T., & Ongaro, E. (2021). A Theoretical Framework for Studying the Co Creation of Innovative Solutions and Public Value. Policy & Politics, 49(2), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321x16108172803520
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ferdian Al Ghifari Ganda Hutama, Annur Muhammad Rizki, Fadjar Tri Sakti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
6.png)
