Legalitas Perampasan Aset Illicit Enrichment: Analisis Kekosongan Hukum Dalam Undang – Undang Tipikor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/mkh07x35Keywords:
Non-Conviction, Based (NCB), Illicit Enrichment, Sociology of LawAbstract
Corruption is recognized as an extraordinary crime that undermines national foundations and hinders development. A major challenge in its eradication is the recovery of assets suspected to be derived from corruption but difficult to prove, known as illicit enrichment. This research aims to analyze the legality of illicit enrichment asset forfeiture and identify legal gaps within the Indonesian Anti-Corruption Law (UU Tipikor). The research employs a normative legal method with statutory and comparative approaches. The findings reveal a fundamental legal vacuum in UU Tipikor, as there are no explicit regulations on illicit enrichment, despite Indonesia's ratification of UNCAC. The current legal system remains heavily dependent on proving the predicate crime, which complicates law enforcement efforts to seize unexplained wealth. This study contributes to the development of criminal law, both theoretically and practically, by providing recommendations for the formulation of the Asset Forfeiture Bill (RUU Perampasan Aset). In conclusion, the enactment of the Asset Forfeiture Bill, which integrates concepts of illicit enrichment and Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCBAF), is a crucial step toward strengthening the legality of state asset recovery while maintaining human rights protections.
References
Abdullah, F. (2021). Fathin Abdullah, Prof. Triono Eddy, Dr. Marlina. P-ISSN 2337-7216, E-ISSN 2620-6625, 9(1).
Andika, P., Ahmad, S., & Rifai, A. (2023). Urgency and Challenges of Illicit Enrichment Regulation in the Draft Law on Asset Forfeiture in Indonesia. Kosmik Hukum, 24(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v24i1.19577
Bureni, I. F. K. (2016). Kekosongan Hukum Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 45(4), 292–298.
Fitriyanti, L. D., & Suwandono, A. (2025). Perampasan Aset sebagai Sanksi Tambahan: Analisis Pengembalian Kerugian Negara dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 3(3), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.51903/N9VPM692
Khairul. (2025). Urgensi Pembentukan Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset sebagai Upaya Reformasi Hukum yang Restoratif.
Maruli Silalahi, A., & Tajudin, I. (2018). Profesionalisme Penegak Hukum perhadap Penetapan Tersangka setelah Putusan Praperadilan yang Menyatakan Tidak Sahnya Penetapan Tersangka. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 2(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v2n2.14
Melisa, K. (2025). Pengaturan Hukum Pidana Aset dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. 15(03).
Muzaki, H. (2021). Illicit Enrichment dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurist-Diction, 4(4), 1431. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v4i4.28455
S., Purwadi, H., & H. (2018). Mekanisme Perampasan Aset dengan menggunakan Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 5(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v5i1.18352
Ubaidila, A. S., Liyus, H., & Munandar, T. I. (2024). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terkait Illicit Enrichment sebagai Upaya Pemulihan Aset Negara. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 5(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v5i1.31791
Yurendo, F., Paparang, S. T., & Fitrian, A. (2025). Urgensi Perubahan Frasa “Tidak Wajib Dibuktikan Terlebih Dahulu Tindak Pidana Asal” dalam Pasal 69 Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dalam Rangka Perlindungan Hak Asasi Tersangka dan/atau Terdakwa. Journal Evidence of Law, 4(1), 360–369. https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v4i1.1226
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alvin Amadeus Jaya Mahendra, M Abd. Rohim, Rismalia Putri Anggraini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
6.png)
