Political Communication and Legal Populism in Contemporary Indonesian Governance : The Transformation of Public Trust in State Institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/7njx4114Keywords:
Political communication, Legal populism, Public trust, Institutional legitimacy, GovernanceAbstract
The transformation of political communication in the digital democratic era has reshaped how governments build legitimacy and maintain public trust in state institutions. Although the literature on legal populism and institutional trust has expanded considerably, limited attention has been paid to how political communication mediates the relationship between law, legitimacy, and public trust. This study examines the role of political communication in constructing institutional legitimacy through legal populism within the context of contemporary Indonesian governance. Employing a qualitative approach, the study utilizes political discourse analysis of 245 documents, including presidential speeches, government press releases, ministerial statements, strategic policy documents, official government social media content, and national media coverage published between 2019 and 2025. Data were analyzed using NVivo 14 through thematic coding and inter-narrative relationship analysis. The findings reveal that governmental political communication is structured around four interconnected dimensions: the construction of the people as the primary source of legitimacy, legal legitimacy as a mechanism for policy justification, national interest narratives as a developmental framework, and the representation of state institutions as guardians of public interests. The interaction of these dimensions contributes to the formation of public trust, which subsequently reinforces institutional legitimacy and governance stability. This study develops the concept of **Communicative Legal Populism**, defined as a political legitimation mechanism that integrates law, political communication, national interests, and popular representation in the construction of public trust. The findings extend the literature on legal populism and institutional trust by demonstrating that political communication functions as a critical mediator between law and state legitimacy in contemporary democracies.
References
Aleluia, J., Tharakan, P., Chikkatur, A. P., Shrimali, G., & Chen, X. (2022). Accelerating a clean energy transition in Southeast Asia: Role of governments and public policy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112226
Baig, F. Z., Iqbal, J., Ali, H., Hudda, N. U., Zaidi, S. D. B., & Khan, A. A. (2023). Politicizing Power, Politics and Ideology: A Political Discourse Analysis (PDA) of Pakistani Political Parties’ Slogans. Russian Law Journal, 11(11), 610–627.
Bellamy, R. (2023). Political constitutionalism and populism. Journal of Law and Society, 50(S1), S7–S25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12401
Bennett, D. L., Boudreaux, C., & Nikolaev, B. (2023). Populist discourse and entrepreneurship: The role of political ideology and institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 54(1), 151–181. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00515-9
Breaugh, J., Rackwitz, M., & Hammerschmid, G. (2023). Leadership and institutional design in collaborative government digitalisation: Evidence from Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, and the UK. Government Information Quarterly, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101788
Bussu, S., Bua, A., Dean, R., & Smith, G. (2022). Introduction: Embedding participatory governance. Critical Policy Studies, 16(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2022.2053179
Cupać, J., Schopmans, H., & Tuncer-Ebetürk, İ. (2024). Democratization in the age of artificial intelligence: introduction to the special issue. Democratization, 31(5), 899–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2024.2338852
Dowling, M.-E. (2022). Cyber information operations: Cambridge Analytica’s challenge to democratic legitimacy. Journal of Cyber Policy, 7(2), 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2022.2081089
Drobitko, E., & Boldyreva, E. (2024). Is Populism an Ideology? A Critique of the “Thin Ideology” Concept. Springer Geography, Part F3974, 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70886-2_17
Etaywe, A. (2026). CDA/PDA of Digital Activism and Discursive Resistance to Disinformation: Ethical Tenor, Positioning, Counter-Framing, and Axiological Bonding. Corpus Pragmatics, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-026-00231-x
Fabbrizi, V. (2023). What does populism mean for democracy? Populist practice, democracy and constitutionalism. Ethics and Global Politics, 16(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2023.2273568
Ferreira, L. S. (2026). Can a leader be our neighbor? Political authority and mediated intimacy in the algorithmic age. European Politics and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2026.2662957
Hidayah, A. R., Bajari, A., Hidayat, D. R., & Maryani, E. (2025). Shifting from Religious Populism to Authoritarian Populism: Two Decades of Identity Politics Dynamics in Indonesia. Social Sciences, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14010045
Jackson, K. (2022). The Public Trust: Administrative Legitimacy and Democratic Lawmaking. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4210691
Jiang, B., & Raza, M. Y. (2023). Research on China’s renewable energy policies under the dual carbon goals: A political discourse analysis. Energy Strategy Reviews, 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101118
Katsambekis, G. (2022). Constructing ‘the people’ of populism: a critique of the ideational approach from a discursive perspective. Journal of Political Ideologies, 27(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2020.1844372
Kiratli, O. S., & Schlipphak, B. (2025). Populism and public attitudes toward international organizations: Voting, communication, and education. Review of International Organizations, 20(3), 503–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-023-09526-z
Kyriacou, A., & Trivin, P. (2024). Populism and the rule of law: The importance of institutional legacies. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12935
Lacatus, C., Meibauer, G., & Löfflmann, G. (2023). Introduction: Populism, Political Communication and Performative Leadership in International Politics. Palgrave Macmillan Series in International Political Communication, Part F1691, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41640-8_1
Lewandowski, A., & Polakowski, M. (2024). Post-Communist Populism in Poland: The Case of the Law and Justice Party. Ethnopolitics, 23(4), 386–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2023.2194111
Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2022). Bringing political science back into public administration research. Governance, 35(4), 962–982. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12705
Shah, D. H., Khosla, M., Greene, J., & Purdy, J. (2022). Political change and the decline and Survival of conStitutional democracy in Malaysia and Indonesia. Constitutional Studies, 8.
Siregar, F. E. (2024). Between the People and the Populists: Safeguarding Judicial Independence in a Changing World. Constitutional Review, 10(1), 170–201. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1016
Spanuth, A., & Urbano, D. (2024). Exploring social enterprise legitimacy within ecosystems from an institutional approach: A systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 26(2), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12349
Stanko, J. C. (2025). Dynamic Legitimation Theory and Populist Authoritarian Leaders: The Rhetorical Framing of International Status for Domestic Legitimacy. Political Communication, 42(6), 1059–1086. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2025.2529939
Štětka, V., Brandao, F., Mihelj, S., Tóth, F., Hallin, D., Rothberg, D., Ferracioli, P., & Klimkiewicz, B. (2025). Have people ‘had enough of experts’? The impact of populism and pandemic misinformation on institutional trust in comparative perspective. Information Communication and Society, 28(6), 1039–1060. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2413121
Szabo, L. V., & Bader-Jurj, S. (2026). Electoral Confrontation on Social Media Platforms: Political Communication and Institutional Contestation in Romania (2025). Journalism and Media, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia7010037
Ufen, A. (2023). Civil Society and Efforts At Regime Change in Southeast Asia. Routledge Handbook of Civil and Uncivil Society in Southeast Asia, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367422080-8
Zhang, Q., Chen, W., & Ling, W. (2022). Policy optimization of hydrogen energy industry considering government policy preference in China. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 33, 890–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.017
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Joni Laksito
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
6.png)
