Rekonstruksi Pola Pembuktian Jaksa dalam Perkara Pencucian Uang: Studi Multi-Case Analysis

Authors

  • Krisniati Krisniati Sekolah Tinggi Ekonomi Islam Al Furqon Prabumulih, Sumatera Selatan, Indonesia
  • Chandra Chandra Sekolah Tinggi Ekonomi Islam Al Furqon Prabumulih, Sumatera Selatan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/6dhjd340

Keywords:

Money Laundering, Prosecutorial Proof Pattern, Multi-Case Analysis, Criminal Evidence, Financial Intelligence, Cross-Case Analysis

Abstract

Money laundering poses significant challenges to criminal law enforcement because the complexity of financial transactions requires prosecutors to establish not only the occurrence of predicate crimes but also the relationship between illicit assets, transaction flows, and concealment mechanisms. This study aims to reconstruct prosecutorial proof patterns in money laundering cases through a qualitative approach using Multi-Case Analysis. The study analyzed eight final and binding money laundering cases selected through purposive sampling, representing diverse predicate crimes and evidentiary configurations. Data were collected from court judgments, indictments, legal regulations, financial intelligence reports, and supporting legal documents, and were analyzed using within-case analysis, cross-case analysis, and constant comparative analysis. The findings demonstrate that successful prosecution depends primarily on the integration of documentary evidence, financial intelligence, electronic evidence, expert testimony, and witness statements into a coherent legal argument rather than on the quantity of evidence presented. Cross-case synthesis resulted in the development of the Cross-Case Prosecutorial Proof Pattern Model, which conceptualizes the sequential reconstruction of predicate crimes, financial transaction tracing, asset ownership verification, and integrated legal argumentation. This model contributes theoretically by reframing criminal proof as an argument reconstruction process and provides a practical analytical framework to support more systematic, adaptive, and effective prosecutorial strategies in handling increasingly complex money laundering cases

References

Agarwal, U., Rishiwal, V., Tanwar, S., & Yadav, M. (2024). Blockchain and Crypto Forensics: Investigating Crypto Frauds. International Journal of Network Management, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/nem.2255

Akartuna, E. A., Johnson, S. D., & Thornton, A. (2025). Motivating a Standardised Approach to Financial Intelligence: A Typological Scoping Review of Money Laundering Methods and Trends. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 21(4), 1367–1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-024-09623-y

Al-Raggad, M., Albalawee, N., Al-Mahasneh, A., Abu Huson, Y., & Albajaly, A. (2025). Unveiling Financial Crimes: Advancing Forensic Accounting Practices and Ethical Integrity through Bibliometric Insights. Safer Communities, 24(3), 244–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/SC-11-2024-0069

AlQudah, A., Hailat, M., & Setabouha, D. (2025). Money Laundering in Global Economies: How Economic Openness and Governance Affect Money Laundering in the EU, G20, BRICS, and CIVETS. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5318358

Amjad, R. M., Rafay, A., Arshed, N., Munir, M., & Amjad, M. M. (2022). Non-Linear Impact of Globalization on Financial Crimes: A Case of Developing Economies. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 25(2), 358–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-03-2021-0023

Antara, D. M., Budiartha, I. N., & Wesna, P. A. S. (2023). Arrangements for Reporting Suspicious Financial Transactions by Notaries to the Financial Transaction Analysis Reporting Center. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business Law and Local Wisdom in Tourism (ICBLT 2022), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-93-0_6

Bociga, D., Lord, N., & Bellotti, E. (2025). Dare to Share: Information and Intelligence Sharing within The UK’s Anti-Money Laundering Regime. Policing and Society, 35(6), 812–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2024.2428735

Castelao-López, J., Corzo Santamaría, T., & Lagoa-Varela, D. (2025). Analysis of the Main Techniques and Tools to Combat Money Laundering: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Money Laundering Control. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-10-2024-0159

D’Avino, C. (2023). Money Laundering and AML Regulatory and Judicial System Regimes: Investigation of FinCEN Files. European Journal of Law and Economics, 55(2), 195–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-022-09756-3

Deanoska Trendafilova, A. (2025). Money Laundering, Predicate Offences and Professional Money Laundering Perpetrators. Iustinianus Primus Law Review, 16(2), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.55302/iplr2516212dt

Dote-Pardo, J. S., & Severino-González, P. (2025). Money Laundering in Emerging Countries: Patterns, Trends, and Knowledge Gaps From a Systematic Review. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 28(2), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-01-2025-0002

Ferreira, M. A., & Gonçalves, A. B. (2022). Criminal Governance and Systems of Parallel Justice: Practice and Implications in Brazilian Urban Peripheries. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2021.100519

Ferrill, J., de Koker, L., & Goldbarsht, D. (2025). Financial Crime Prevention in an Age of Paradox. European Yearbook of International Economic Law, Part F4996, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-06360-1_1

Gilmour, P. M. (2023). Reexamining the Anti-Money-Laundering Framework: A Legal Critique and New Approach to Combating Money Laundering. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-02-2022-0041

Güngör, M. (2026). A General Overview of Blockchain Technology and Crypto Assets from the Perspective of Criminal Law. Sustainable Finance, Part F1654, 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-16198-7_14

Hamilton, R., & Leuprecht, C. (2024). The Crime-Crypto Nexus: Nuancing Risk Across Crypto-Crime Transactions. Ius Gentium, 115, 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59543-1_2

Huang, L., & Pontell, H. N. (2023). Crime and Crisis In China’s P2P Online Lending Market: A Comparative Analysis of Fraud. Crime, Law and Social Change, 79(4), 369–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-022-10053-y

Isolauri, E. A., Zettinig, P., & Nummela, N. (2022). Emerging International Compliance: Policy Implications of a Money Laundering Case. Journal of International Business Policy, 5(3), 384–405. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-021-00127-4

Kalokoh, A. (2024). Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks and Democratic Governance: A Global Correlational Analysis. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 27(5), 825–844. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-09-2023-0151

Kaur, B., Sood, K., & Grima, S. (2023). A Systematic Review on Forensic Accounting and its Contribution Towards Fraud Detection and Prevention. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 31(1), 60–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC-02-2022-0015

Levi, M. (2022). Lawyers as Money Laundering Enablers? An Evolving and Contentious Relationship. CrimRxiv. https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.73207927

Li, L., Gao, H., Song, B., & Cui, C. (2024). How to Use Evidence Rules Reasonably to Resolve Land Disputes: Analysis of Typical Land Dispute Cases from China. Land, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081187

Makmur, K. L. (2024). Why Only Scrutinise Formal Finance? Money Laundering and Informal Remittance Regulations in Indonesia. Journal of Economic Criminology, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2024.100111

Menon, R. E. (2023). From Crime Prevention to Norm Compliance: Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Policy Adoption in Singapore from 1989-2021. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4327921

Oztas, B., Cetinkaya, D., Adedoyin, F., Budka, M., Aksu, G., & Dogan, H. (2024). Transaction Monitoring in Anti-Money Laundering: A Qualitative Analysis and Points of View From Industry. Future Generation Computer Systems, 159, 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2024.05.027

Pramanik, M. I., Ghose, P., Hossen, M. D., Ahmed, M. H. U., Rahman, M. M., & Bhuiyan, M. R. I. (2025). Emerging Technological Trends in Financial Crime and Money Laundering: A Bibliometric Analysis of Cryptocurrency’s Role and Global Research Collaboration. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(6), 3611–3633. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i6.2493

Riccardi, M., & Reuter, P. (2024). The Varieties of Money Laundering and the Determinants of Offender Choices. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 30(3), 333–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-024-09603-y

Saputra, R., Setiodjati, J. P., & Barkhuizen, J. (2023). Under-Legislation in Electronic Trials and Renewing Criminal Law Enforcement in Indonesia (Comparison with United States). Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 8(1), 243–288. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i1.67632

Sihombing, L. A. (2026). Quo Vadis Legal Shielding: Examining the Abuse of Attorney Immunity as a Corporate Enabler in Indonesia’s Money Laundering Landscape. Cogent Social Sciences, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2026.2637242

Srivastav, S., Shruti, K. M., Agarwal, D., Soni, P., & Singh, R. (2026). Intelligent Justice: AI-Driven Forensics and Legal Process for Criminal Justice Reforms. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2026.100832

Stoykova, R. (Adi). (2024). A New Right to Procedural Accuracy: A Governance Model for Digital Evidence in Criminal Proceedings. Computer Law & Security Review, 55, 106040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106040

Wronka, C. (2023). Financial Crime in the Decentralized Finance Ecosystem: New Challenges for Compliance. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-09-2021-0218

Yofiza, Limbong, I., Kholis, N., Ritonga, A. S., Panyalai, R. S., & Fahreza, R. M. (2025). Implementasi Pendekatan Follow The Money dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (TPPU) dari Sisi Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 3(1), 01–12. https://doi.org/10.51903/JAKSA.V3I1.2274

Downloads

Published

2026-07-20

How to Cite

Rekonstruksi Pola Pembuktian Jaksa dalam Perkara Pencucian Uang: Studi Multi-Case Analysis. (2026). Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 4(3), 92-107. https://doi.org/10.51903/6dhjd340