Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Yang Tidak Menerima Produk Pembelian Jasa Titip (Jastip) Berupa Tiket Konser Melalui Media Twitter Ditinjau Dari Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam

Authors

  • Cholqi Choirunnisa Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Nisbati Sandiyah Humaeroh Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Rahma Eka Fitriani Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v1i3.1251

Keywords:

consumers, positive law, Islamic law

Abstract

The Criminal Code (KUHP) regulates several forms of theft committed against property. The crime of fraud is defined in Articles 378 to 395 of Chapter XXV of the Penal Code, which further classifies different types of fraud into more nuanced categories. This type of theft, known as "criminal fraud," is a serious crime that occurs frequently. Fraud crimes can affect all levels of society and can be committed at all social levels, from the lowest to the highest. The crime of criminal fraud arises from the offender's reliance on the trust of others, and succeeds when the offender has the right opportunity and conditions to capitalize on that trust. The financial penalty for those who commit financial fraud is also set at four years in prison. In contrast, perpetrators of this type of crime are not subject to specific regulations in Islamic law. However, the main question that arises from this research is how the liability of perpetrators of financial fraud crimes according to Islamic law and positive law. The purpose of this research is to find out the rules and penalties associated with this type of fraud, as well as how Islamic law treats this type of dishonesty. The research for this article was conducted by searching for relevant information in academic journals and reference books. Meanwhile, the data collection method was conducted using the cryptanalysis method. The results show that Islamic law relating to the crime of fraud falls under the category of ta'zir. This ta'ziri law can be in the form of imprisonment, flogging, stoning, flogging, cutting hands, beheading, and stoning. Laws codified in Islamic law are more likely to achieve the intended goals of fostering social order and preventing widespread chaos.

References

Puteri Asyifa Octavia Apandy, Melawati 2, and Panji Adam. “PENTINGNYA HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN DALAM JUAL BELI.” Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, Volume 3, No. 1, Juli 2021 3, no. 1 (2021): 1–7.
Aditia, Andika. “Profil Coldplay Dan Biodata Personelnya, Jangan Cuma Tahu Chris Martin Saja.” Kompas.com, 2023. https://entertainment.kompas.com/read/2023/05/09/152733966/profil-coldplay-dan-biodata-personelnya-jangan-cuma-tahu-chris-martin?page=all.
Alamasyah, Yusca Satria, Saif Askari, and Khafid Abadi. “Jasa Titip ( JASTIP ) Barang Prespektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif ( Studi Kasus Pemilik Akun Instagram @ Azkaestu ).” Volume 2, Nomor 1, Tahun 2022, 2022.
Erika Kurnia. “Penipu Jasa Titip Tiket Konser Coldplay Di TANGKAP Polisi.” Kompas.com, 2023. https://www.kompas.id/baca/metro/2023/05/22/penipu-jastip-tiket-konser-coldplay-ditangkap-polisi.
Hanafi, Ahmad. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Islam. Cetakan ke. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 2005.
Indonesia, Republik. Undang Undang Republik Indonesia No 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen (1999).
“Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Online.” diakses pada tanggal 30 Mei 2023, n.d. https://kbbi.web.id/afiliasi.
Mahesti, Indira Putri. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengguna Jasa Titip Online.” Kertha Negra 07. No. 10 (2019): 1.
Marsaid. AL-FIQH AL-JINAYAH ( Hukum Pidana Islam ). Edited by Jauhari. Cetakan 1. Palembang: Amanah, 2020.
Nasir, Badruddin, M Si, Ifan Luthfian, S Sos, and M Si. “PEMANFAATAN MEDIA SOSIAL TWITTER DI KALANGAN PELAJAR SMK NEGERI 5” 4 (2016): 239–51.
Nawi, Syahrudidin. “Hak Dan Kewajiban Konsumen Menurut UU No.8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen” 07. No. 1 (2018): 3–4.
Nugrahaningsih, Widi. dan Erlinawati, Mira. Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Online. Surakarta: Pustaka Bengawan, 2017.
Nur, Muhammad. PENGANTAR DAN ASAS-ASAS HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM. Edited by Nurdin. Banda Aceh: Yayasan PeNA Aceh, 2020.
Rachman,M. Yogi. Hanifah,Mardalena. dan Hasanah, Ulfiah. “Tanggung Jawab Penjual Kepada Pembeli Melalui Media Online Menurut Undang Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Transaksi Elektronik Pada Toko Online Rynakosmetik.” Riau University, 2016, 9.
Salamiah. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KONSUMEN DALAM KEGIATAN JUAL BELI” VI No. 12 (2014): 39–52.
Seran, Marcel dan Wahyu, Anna Maria. “Penggunaan Klausula Eksoneri Dalam Perjanjian Dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen.” Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia 25 No. 2 (2006): 161.
Setiadi, Ahmad. “Pemanfaatan Media Sosial Untuk Efektifitas Komunikasi,” no. 1 (n.d.).

Siambaton, Tulus. dan Tarigan, Yosua Lorenzo. “Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Akibat Iklan Yang Menyesatkan Pada Media Cetak” 01 No 02 (2020): 143–54.
Sitompul, Roswita. Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Medan: Pustaka Bangsa Press, 2006.
Subekti. Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: PT Intermasa, 2005.
Syarbaini, Ahmad. “Teori Ta’zir Dalam Hukum Pidana Islam,” n.d., 1–10.
Vika Kartika*, Budiharto, Siti Mahmudah. “TANGGUNG JAWAB DIREKSI DALAM HAL TERJADI TRANSAKSI AFILIASI YANG MENGANDUNG BENTURAN KEPENTINGAN PADA KASUS PT. SUMALINDO LESTARI JAYA TBK.” Volume 6, Nomor 2, Tahun 2017 6 (2017): 1–20.
Wayan, Ni, Julia Pradnya, Fakultas Hukum, and Universitas Udayana. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENYEDIA JASA DAN PEMBELI DALAM PERJANJIAN JASA TITIP ONLINE PADA APLIKASI INSTAGRAM” 9, no. 11 (n.d.): 973–83.
Yulius, Louis. “TANGGUNG JAWAB PELAKU USAHA ATAS PRODUK YANG MERUGIKAN KONSUMEN.” Lex Privatum, Vol.I/No.3/Juli/2013, no. 3 (2013).

Downloads

Published

2023-07-06

How to Cite

Cholqi Choirunnisa, Nisbati Sandiyah Humaeroh, & Rahma Eka Fitriani. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Yang Tidak Menerima Produk Pembelian Jasa Titip (Jastip) Berupa Tiket Konser Melalui Media Twitter Ditinjau Dari Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam. Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Sosial, 1(3), 254–278. https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v1i3.1251