Analisis Yuridis Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Ulayat Berdasarkan Putusan Perkara Perdata Nomor: 13/Pdt.G/2021/Pn End

Authors

  • Maria Angelica Dei Nai Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Agustinus Hedewata Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Husni Kusuma Dinata Universitas Nusa Cendana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v2i2.1755

Keywords:

Customary Land Disputes, Proof of Customary Land Rights, Judges' Considerations.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the juridical ownership of customary land rights based on the decision of civil case Number: 13/Pdt.G/2021/Pn End. The type of research used by the author is Normative Legal research. The sources of legal materials used in this research are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The method of processing legal materials through 4 (four) stages, namely identification of legal materials, inventory of legal materials, verification of legal materials and interpretation of legal materials which are then analyzed descriptively qualitatively.  Based on the research results, the Plaintiff was unable to prove that the disputed object was his property and vice versa the Defendants were unable to prove that the disputed object was customary land belonging to the Kila Da Tribe. This is because there are inconsistencies regarding the structure, hierarchy, and mechanism of worship in the Customary Law Community that differ in the evidence of the Plaintiff and the Defendants. The Plaintiffs and Defendants were also unable to prove recognition by executive agencies regarding ownership of the disputed object. In addition, the Plaintiff was unable to prove that he was a legitimate heir as stipulated in Article 832 of the Civil Code. Likewise, the Defendants were unable to prove that they were the legitimate heirs of Kila Da from Wednesday Kila's descendants. The author argues that the consideration of the Panel of Judges in giving a decision in this case was correct, by rejecting the Plaintiff's claim in its entirety. Because all the arguments of the lawsuit regarding ownership of rights to customary land, cannot be proven by the Plaintiff.

References

Abdulkadir Muhammad, Hukum Perikatan, Alumni, Bandung, 2002

Adrian Sutedi, Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah dan Pendaftarannya, Jakarta, cet.9 Sinar Grafika, 2018

Alting Husen, Dinamika Hukum dalam Pengakuan dan Perlindungan Hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat atas Tanah, Yogyakarta, 2010

Baz, Haar, Ter, B. Mr (Disunting oleh Bambang Danu Nugroho), Asas-asas dan Tatanan Hukum Adat, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2011.

Boedi Harsono, Hukum Agraria Indonesia, Jakarta, Djambatan, 2003

Buku Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Nusa Cendana

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Kamus Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta, 2008

Direktorat Putusan MA Republik Indonesia, “Putusan Nomor 13/Pdt.G/2021/PN End”,https://putusan3.mahkamaagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaec961aabb12f2ca80c313630393433.html

Djamanat Samosir, Hukum Adat Eksistensi dalam Dinamika Perkembangan Hukum di Indonesia,Bandung, CV. Nuansa Aulia, 2013

Dyara Radhite Oryza Fea, Panduan Mengurus Tanah dan Perizinannya, Legality

H.F.A.Volmar, Pengantar Study Hukum Perdata (Diterjemahkan Oleh I.S. Adiwinata), Jakarta, Rajawali Pers, 2004

Ishaq, “Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, serta Disertasi”, Alfabeta, CV, Cet.1, 2017.

Laila Rasyid & Herniawati, “Hukum Acara Perdata”, Sulawesi: Unimal Press, 2015.

Merdesa Institute, Memahami Wilayah Adat, https://merdesainstitute.id/ memahami- wilayah-adat/, diakses pada tanggal 1 Maret 2023

Moertiono, R. J. (2020). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Akibat Penguasaan Tanah Tanpa Hak (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 1319 K/Pdt/2011). Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA, 2(1), 1-21.

Munir Fuady II, “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum”, Bandung, Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002

Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 18 Tahun 2019 Tentang Tata Cara Penatausahaan Tanah Ulayat Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat.

Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 52 Tahun 2014 tentang Pedoman Pengakuan dan Perlindungan Masyarakat Hukum Adat.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah

R Suryatin, “Hukum Perikatan”, Jakarta, Pradnya Paramita, 2001,

R. Wirjono Prodjodikoro, “Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum”, Bandung, sumur,

Sumarto, “Penanganan dan Penyelesaian Konflik Pertanahan dengan Prinsip Win-Win Solution oleh Badan Pertanahan nasional RI” Disampaikan pada Diklat Direktorat Konflik Pertanahan Kemendagri RI tanggal 19 September 2012

Undang-Undang Dasar 1945

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Pokok Agraria

Urip Santoso, Hukum Agraria Kajian Komprehensif, Jakarta, Kencana, 2012

Downloads

Published

2024-02-12

How to Cite

Maria Angelica Dei Nai, Agustinus Hedewata, & Husni Kusuma Dinata. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Ulayat Berdasarkan Putusan Perkara Perdata Nomor: 13/Pdt.G/2021/Pn End. Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Sosial, 2(2), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v2i2.1755