Perlindungan Hukum Pemilik Benda Gadai Yang Bendanya Dijadikan Objek Gadai Oleh Orang Lain Tanpa Persetujuannya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v2i2.1757Keywords:
Pawn, Legal Protection, Owner Of The Object, CreditorsAbstract
Basically, the only person who can pawn an object is the owner of the object, but now incidents have become widespread where other people pawn objects that do not belong to them without the consent of the owner of the object. In this case, the owner of the object can file a lawsuit for revindication when the object is taken by someone else. However, Article 1977 paragraph (1) BW states that whoever controls a movable object is considered the owner. Given these legal problems, this research wants to examine the legal protection of owners of pawned objects whose objects are used as pawn objects by other people without their consent. This research aims to analyze the applicability of the Nemo Plus Juris Transferre Potest Quam Ipse Habet principle as a basis for encumbrances on pledged objects without the consent of the owner of the object as well as legal protection for the owner of the object and the recipient of the pledge when the object is used as an object of pawn by another person without the knowledge of the owner of the object. The research method used in this research is normative legal research using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This research uses primary and secondary legal sources by collecting through literature studies which are then analyzed using descriptive analytical methods. The results of the research are that the agreement made by the pawnbroker and the debtor who is not the owner of the object is valid because the validity of the pledge is determined by handing over the pawned object to the creditor and the creditor cannot be blamed if he receives an unregistered movable object in good faith.
References
BUKU
Bakarbessy L and Anand G, Buku Ajar Hukum Perikatan (Zifatama Jawara 2018)
Isnaeni M, Hukum Benda Dalam Burgerlijk Wetboek (PT REVKA PETRA MEDIA 2016)
Marzuki PM, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Edisi Revisi (Prenadamedia Group 2008)
Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana (PT Bima Aksara 1993)
JURNAL
Marzuki, ‘Liability Dan Responsibility . Tanggung-Gugat ( Liability )’ (2009) 2
INTERNET
‘ART Di Alor Gadaikan Perhiasan Majikan Untuk Beli Motor Dan Berjudi’ <https://regional.kompas.com/read/2022/06/02/191459378/art-di-alor-gadaikan-perhiasan-majikan-untuk-beli-motor-dan-berjudi?page=all> accessed 7 November 2023
Bakarbessy L and Anand G, Buku Ajar Hukum Perikatan (Zifatama Jawara 2018)
‘Curi Emas Senilai Rp 80 Juta Di Tanjungpinang Untuk Foya-Foya, Pria Ini Ditangkap Di Bali’ <https://regional.kompas.com/read/2022/06/17/202618878/curi-emas-senilai-rp-80-juta-di-tanjungpinang-untuk-foya-foya-pria-ini#google_vignette> accessed 7 November 2023
‘Ibu Rumah Tangga Ini Gadai Emas Hasil Curiannya Di Tiga Pegadaian - Samawa Rea’ <https://www.samawarea.com/2023/05/ibu-rumah-tangga-ini-gadai-emas-hasil-curiannya-di-tiga-pegadaian/> accessed 7 November 2023
Marzuki, ‘Liability Dan Responsibility . Tanggung-Gugat ( Liability )’ (2009) 2
Marzuki PM, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Edisi Revisi (Prenadamedia Group 2008)
——, Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi (Kencana 2021)
Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana (PTBima Aksara 1993)
Prasastinah Usanti T and Bakarbessy L, Buku Referensi Hukum Perbankan Hukum Jaminan (PT REVKA PETRA MEDIA 2014)
Rahardjo S, Ilmu Hukum (PT Citra Aditya Bakti 2000)
Rivai V, ‘Perbankan Dan Masalah Kredit’ [2008] Islamic Finansial Management hlm. 666
Usanti TP, ‘Lahirnya Hak Kebendaan’ (2012) 17 Perspektif 44
Yuda Hernoko A, Hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Kontrak Komersial (Prenadamedia Group 2010)