Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Di Kejaksaan Negeri Klaten

Dessy Permata Diani; Sulistyanta Sulistyanta

doi:10.51903/hakim.v2i2.1822

Dessy Permata Diani Universitas Sebelas Maret
Sulistyanta Sulistyanta Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v2i2.1822

Keywords: Restorative Justice, Crime of Embezzlement, Prosecutor

Abstract

This research was conducted with the aim of finding out the application and obstacles to restorative justice in resolving the crime of embezzlement at the Klaten District Prosecutor's Office. This research uses a type of juridical-empirical research, namely research by collecting data through interviews. This research uses material collection techniques through interviews and observations as well as literature study. The crime of embezzlement is one of the crimes that can be implemented by restorative justice efforts, because in general this crime is a property crime that can be restored to the goods or objects that are the object of the crime of embezzlement so that when the restoration to its original condition is fulfilled, then the criminal case is there is no need to continue the legal process. The results of this research indicate that the application of restorative justice in resolving the crime of embezzlement at the Klaten District Prosecutor's Office is guided by the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice. The implementation of the restorative justice process does not always run smoothly, there are several obstacles. However, this obstacle is not a serious problem so it can be overcome by the Klaten District Prosecutor's Office.

References

Artikel Jurnal

I Ketut Seregig, dkk. (2022). Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan dalam Jabatan. Pampas Journal Of Criminal Law, 3 (1).

Indriyani, A. (2019). Pendekatan Restorative Justice Dalam Melindungi Korban Kekerasan Seksual. Indonesian Journal of Gender Studies, 2(2).

Nusantara, Hari. (2021). Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Berdasarkan Pasal 372 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Maqasidi Syariah dan Hukum, 1 (2).

Syahputra, Eko. (2021). Penerapan Konsep Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Masa yang Akan Datang. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 3(2).

Website/Internet

Hidayat, T. (2022). Upaya Restorative Justice Gagal, Sidang Dugaan Penggelapan Tetap Digelar PN Sleman. Diakses dari https://timesindonesia.co.id/hukum-kriminal/421564/upaya-restorative-justice-gagal-sidang-dugaan-penggelapan-tetap-digelar-pn-sleman, pada tanggal 03 Agustus 2022 pukul 15:36.

Buku Teks

I Ketut Suardana & Putu Candrawati. (2018). Nasionalisme dan Ketahanan Budaya di Indonesia. Depok: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Osse, A. (2006). Memahami Pemolisian. Jakarta Selatan: CV Graha Buana.

Resktodipuro, M. (1997). Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jakarta: Pusat Pelayanan Keadilan dan Pengabdian Hukum Lembaga Kriminologi Universitas Indonesia.

Sholihah, F. (2017). Sosiologi Hukum. Depok: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Peraturan perundang-undangan

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2021 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.

Peraturan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.