Hak dan Kewajiban Negara dalam Mengatasi Kejahatan Lintas Batas di Era Digital: Pendekatan Analisis Normatif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v2i4.2154Keywords:
Kejahatan Siber, Regulasi Internasional, Keamananan Digital, Kerjasama InternasionalAbstract
The digital era has significantly increased the complexity of cross-border crimes, particularly cybercrime, which poses substantial challenges for countries, including Indonesia. With a reported rise in cross-border cybercrime incidents of over 50% in the last five years, Indonesia faces critical legal and technical hurdles in combating such threats. This study explores the rights and obligations of states in addressing cross-border cybercrime, focusing on comparing Indonesia's legal framework with international standards, specifically the Budapest Convention. Employing a normative analytical method, this research examines international and national legal documents to identify gaps and evaluate the alignment of Indonesia's cybercrime regulations with global standards. Key findings reveal that Indonesia's cybercrime policies lack mandatory international cooperation mechanisms and are limited to national jurisdiction, which restricts the country’s ability to effectively address cybercrimes involving foreign perpetrators. In contrast, the Budapest Convention emphasizes structured international collaboration, robust privacy protections, and flexible jurisdictional arrangements, providing a comprehensive framework for managing transnational cyber threats. The study concludes that harmonizing Indonesia’s regulations with international standards, such as the Budapest Convention, is essential for improving the nation's capacity to combat cross-border cybercrime. Recommendations include enhancing legal frameworks to mandate international cooperation, establishing specialized units within law enforcement agencies equipped with advanced digital forensic tools, and strengthening privacy protections to align with global norms. This research contributes to the discourse on international cybercrime management by offering practical strategies to bridge regulatory gaps and bolster Indonesia’s position in global cybersecurity collaborations. The findings underscore the urgency for policy reform to address the evolving challenges of digital threats in an interconnected world.
References
Agus Salim, & Elfran Bima Muttaqin. (2024). Persidangan Elektronik (E-Litigasi) pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Paulus Law Journal, 2(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.51342/plj.v2i1.150
Ahangama, S. (2023). Relating Social Media Diffusion, Education Level and Cybersecurity Protection Mechanisms to E-Participation Initiatives: Insights from a Cross-Country Analysis. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(5), 1695–1711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10385-7
Argyroudis, S. A., Mitoulis, S. A., Chatzi, E., Baker, J. W., Brilakis, I., Gkoumas, K., Vousdoukas, M., Hynes, W., Carluccio, S., Keou, O., Frangopol, D. M., & Linkov, I. (2022). Digital Technologies Can Enhance Climate Resilience of Critical Infrastructure. Climate Risk Management, 35, 100387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100387
Ari, R., Altinay, Z., Altinay, F., Dagli, G., & Ari, E. (2022). Sustainable Management and Policies: The Roles of Stakeholders in the Practice of Inclusive Education in Digital Transformation. Electronics, 11(4), 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11040585
Arnell, P., & Faturoti, B. (2023). The Prosecution of Cybercrime – Why Transnational and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Should be Resisted. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 37(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2022.2061888
Broeders, D., Cristiano, F., & Weggemans, D. (2023). Too Close for Comfort: Cyber Terrorism and Information Security across National Policies and International Diplomacy. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 46(12), 2426–2453. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610x.2021.1928887
Iu, K. Y., & Wong, V. M.-Y. (2023). The Trans-National Cybercrime Court: Towards A New Harmonisation of Cyber Law Regime in ASEAN. International Cybersecurity Law Review, 5(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1365/s43439-023-00105-x
Kanteler, D., & Bakouros, I. (2024). A Collaborative Framework for Cross-Border Disaster Management in the Balkans. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 108, 104506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104506
Lumintosari, F. R., Santoso, M. P. T., & Hakiem, F. N. (2024). Peluang dan Tantangan Diplomasi Digital dalam Meningkatkan Keamanan Siber Indonesia. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(3), 746–754. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i3.10537
Maksymova, I., Vyshnevska, K., Lavrenko, R., Baida, M., & Kulishov, V. (2023). Methodology for Researching Digital Diplomacy in the New Era of Sustainable Development and Climate Change. Economics and Technical Engineering, 1(2), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.62911/ete.2023.01.02.01
Nukusheva, A., Zhamiyeva, R., Shestak, V., & Rustembekova, D. (2022). Formation of a Legislative Framework in the Field of Combating Cybercrime And Strategic Directions of its Development. Security Journal, 35(3), 893–912. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-021-00304-3
Pires, J. R. A., Souza, V. G. L., Fuciños, P., Pastrana, L., & Fernando, A. L. (2022). Methodologies to Assess the Biodegradability of Bio-Based Polymers-Current Knowledge and Existing Gaps. Polymers, 14(7), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14071359
Puri, M., Gandhi, K., & Kumar, M. S. (2023). Emerging Environmental Contaminants: A Global Perspective on Policies and Regulations. Journal of Environmental Management, 332, 117344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117344
Pursiainen, C., & Kytömaa, E. (2023). From European Critical Infrastructure Protection to the Resilience of European Critical Entities: What Does it Mean? Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 8(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2022.2128562
Rahman, I., Muhtar, M. H., Mongdong, N. M., Setiawan, R., Setiawan, B., & Siburian, H. K. (2024). Harmonization of Digital laws and Adaptation Strategies in Indonesia focusing on E-Commerce and Digital Transactions. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(1), 4314–4327. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i1.8240
Saeed, S., Altamimi, S. A., Alkayyal, N. A., Alshehri, E., & Alabbad, D. A. (2023). Digital Transformation and Cybersecurity Challenges for Businesses Resilience: Issues and Recommendations. Sensors, 23(15), 6666. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23156666
Sarkar, G., & Shukla, S. K. (2023). Behavioral Analysis of Cybercrime: Paving the Way for Effective Policing Strategies. Journal of Economic Criminology, 2, 100034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2023.100034
Sharifi, A., Allam, Z., Bibri, S. E., & Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R. (2024). Smart Cities and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Systematic Literature Review of Co-Benefits and Trade-Offs. Cities, 146, 104659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104659
Spiezia, F. (2022). International Cooperation and Protection of Victims in Cyberspace: Welcoming Protocol II to the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime. ERA Forum, 23(1), 101–108. https://doi.org/s12027-022-00707-8
Strating, R., Rao, S., & Yea, S. (2024). Human Rights at Sea: The Limits of Inter-State Cooperation in Addressing Forced Labour on Fishing Vessels. Marine Policy, 159, 105934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105934
Sundram, P. (2024). ASEAN Cooperation to Combat Transnational Crime: Progress, Perils, and Prospects. Frontiers in Political Science, 6, 1304828. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1304828
Suryanti, B. T. (2021). Pendekatan Neorealis terhadap Studi Keamanan Nasional. Jurnal Diplomasi Pertahanan, 7(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.33172/jdp.v7i1.674
Van Roomen, T. R., & de Jonge, B. (2024). Balancing Privacy and Public Interest in the Fight Against Illicit Financial Flows: Lessons From an European Case Study. Journal of Economic Criminology, 5, 100093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2024.100093
Velasco, C. (2022). Cybercrime and Artificial Intelligence. An Overview of the Work of International Organizations on Criminal Justice and the International Applicable Instruments. ERA Forum, 23(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-022-00702-z
Wardhani, L. T. A. L., Noho, M. D. H., & Natalis, A. (2022). The Adoption of Various Legal Systems in Indonesia: An Effort to Initiate the Prismatic Mixed Legal Systems. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2104710
Zhang, H., & Gong, X. (2023). The Research on an Electronic Evidence Forensic System for Cross-Border Cybercrime. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 28(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127231187059
