Persepsi Masyarakat terhadap Kebijakan Hukuman Mati dalam Kasus Narkotika di Indonesia: Analisis Kuantitatif melalui Survei Nasional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v2i4.2186Keywords:
Hukuman Mati, Persepsi Masyarakat, Kebijakan Narkotika , Survei KuantitatifAbstract
The death penalty remains one of the most contentious policies in addressing narcotics crimes in Indonesia. While implemented as a stringent measure to combat drug trafficking, the policy often sparks debates regarding its effectiveness and implications for human rights. This study aims to analyze public perceptions of the death penalty policy for narcotics-related offenses, focusing on how demographic factors such as age, education, and residence influence public support. Using a quantitative approach, this research employed a nationwide survey involving 1,500 respondents selected through stratified random sampling. Data collection combined online and offline methods to ensure broad representation. The findings reveal significant demographic variations in support for the death penalty. Younger and middle-aged respondents (25–40 years old) showed the highest levels of support (70%), particularly in urban areas (70%) compared to rural areas (55%). Educational attainment also influenced perspectives, with higher education levels correlating with increased support for the policy. The study concludes that public perceptions of the death penalty are shaped significantly by demographic and socio-cultural factors. These findings underscore the need for targeted communication strategies to address varying public concerns, particularly in rural areas where access to information may be limited. The research contributes to policy discussions by providing empirical insights into public opinion on this controversial issue. It recommends integrating public education campaigns and alternative rehabilitative measures to enhance public understanding and acceptance of narcotics policies. By grounding policy development in evidence-based research, this study aims to support more equitable and effective approaches to addressing drug-related crimes in Indonesia
References
Arief Amrullah, M. (2024). Paradigm Shift of Death Penalty Regulation in the New Criminal Code (KUHP) of Indonesia. Lentera Hukum, 11(1), 24–55. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v11i1.45809
Boateng, F. D., & Dzordzormenyoh, M. K. (2021). Capital Punishment in Brazil: Exploring Factors That Predict Public Support for the Death Penalty. Sage Journals, 38(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/10439862211034345
Bogliaccini, J. A., Flores-Macías, G. A., & Tealde, E. (2024). Recidivism, Labor Markets, and Prison Conditions: Evidence from Uruguay. World Development, 183, 106728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106728
Butt, S. (2023). Indonesia’s New Criminal Code: Indigenising and Democratising Indonesian Criminal Law? Griffith Law Review, 32(2), 190–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2023.2243772
Dill, J., Sagan, S. D., & Valentino, B. A. (2022). Kettles of Hawks: Public Opinion on the Nuclear Taboo and Noncombatant Immunity in the United States, United Kingdom, France, and Israel. Security Studies, 31(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2022.2038663
Dudai, R. (2023). Symbolic Laws, De Facto Abolitions and Path Dependence: When Death Penalty Policies Remain Stable. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 62(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12502
Ferguson, C. J., & Smith, S. (2024). Race, Class, and Criminal Adjudication: Is the US Criminal Justice System as Biased as is Often Assumed? A Meta-Analytic Review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 75, 101905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2023.101905
Gooptar, C. (2022). Human Rights Infringements, Delays and the Privy Council: The Conundrum of Human Rights and the Death Penalty in Trinidad and Tobago. The International Journal of Human Rights, 26(2), 348–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2021.1926239
Gunawan, K. A. P., & Bagiastra, I. N. (2023). Analysis of the Death Penalty in the Context of Human Rights Law. West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 1(12), 1391–1398. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v1i12.440
Hannan, K. R., Cullen, F. T., Butler, L. C., Graham, A., Burton, A. L., & Burton, V. S. (2022). Racial Sympathy and Support for Capital Punishment: A Case Study in Concept Transfer. Deviant Behavior, 43(7), 780–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2021.1899756
Hannan, K. R., Cullen, F. T., Graham, A., Jonson, C. L., Pickett, J. T., Haner, M., & Sloan, M. M. (2023). Public Support for Second Look Sentencing: Is There a Shawshank Redemption Effect? Criminology & Public Policy, 22(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12616
Kohno, M., Montinola, G. R., & Winters, M. S. (2023). Foreign Pressure and Public Opinion in Target States. World Development, 169, 106305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106305
Liang, B., Lu, H., & Liu, J. (2021). Testing Death Penalty Opinions With General Questions and A Specific Case Scenario: Potential Lessons from China. Sage Journals, 68(1), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x211066827
Liu, Z. (2022). The Internet Echo Chamber and the Misinformation of Judges: The Case of Judges’ Perception of Public Support for the Death Penalty in china. International Review of Law and Economics, 69, 106028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2021.106028
Lu, H., Shuai, H., Li, Y., Liu, J., & Liang, B. (2022). Confession and the Crime Control Model: An Analysis of Exonerated Death Penalty Cases in China. Asian Journal of Criminology, 17(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-022-09383-6
McCarthy, D., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2024). Attitudes Towards the Death Penalty: An Assessment of Individual and Country-Level Differences. European Journal of Criminology, 21(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708221097670
Muhardis. (2024). Spoonerism in Primetime News Headlines: An Analysis of Sound Harmonization in Indonesian Media. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2357679. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2357679
Nurhadi, S., Rahmat, D., & Sudarto, S. (2024). A Juridical Study on the Role of Justice collaborators in the Criminal Justice System for Drug Cases with the Death Penalty Threat. Literatus, 6(1), 329–334. https://doi.org/10.37010/lit.v6i1.1672
Oliphant, S. N. (2022). Estimating the Effect of Death Penalty Moratoriums on Homicide Rates Using the Synthetic Control Method. Criminology & Public Policy, 21(4), 915–944. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12601
Pollock, W., Tapia, N. D., & Sibila, D. (2021). Cultivation Theory: The Impact of Crime Media’s Portrayal of Race on the Desire to Become a U.S. Police Officer. Sage Journals, 24(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557211036555
Rosselli, M., Uribe, I. V., Ahne, E., & Shihadeh, L. (2022). Culture, Ethnicity, and Level of Education in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurotherapeutics, 19(1), 26–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-022-01193-z
Scott, R. (2022). Does University Make You More Liberal? Estimating the Within-Individual Effects of Higher Education on Political Values. Electoral Studies, 77, 102471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102471
Seto, C. H., & Said, I. (2022). Religious Perceptions of Crime and Implications for Punitiveness. Sage Journals, 24(1), 46–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474520960038
Wu, S. (2022). The Effect of Wrongful Conviction Rate on Death Penalty Support and How It Closes the Racial Gap. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 47(5), 1006–1024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-021-09637-6
Yin, E. T., Boateng, W., & Kofie, N. (2022). Family Acceptance, Economic Situation, and Faith Community: The Lived Experiences of Ex-Convicts in Ghana. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 5(1), 100240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100240
Zatkin, J., Sitney, M., & Kaufman, K. (2021). The Relationship Between Policy, Media, and Perceptions of Sexual Offenders Between 2007 and 2017: A Review of the Literature. Sage Journals, 23(3), 953–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020985568
