Peran Hukum Adat dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Agraria di Indonesia: Kajian Empiris dengan Metode Komparatif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v2i4.2187Keywords:
Sengketa Agraria , Hukum Adat , Hukum Formal , Penyelesaian Konflik , Integrasi HukumAbstract
Agrarian disputes are a crucial issue in Indonesia, particularly in areas that serve as the centers of indigenous communities, where conflicts often arise between customary law and formal law. This study aims to analyze and compare customary and formal law's effectiveness in resolving agrarian disputes, focusing on indigenous regions with strong customary norms. The methodology employed includes semi-structured in-depth interviews and an analysis of customary legal documents, aimed at exploring respondents' perspectives and collecting data from relevant documents. The findings reveal that customary law often proves more responsive to the needs of local communities and creates fairer resolutions, whereas formal law tends to operate within a more universal framework and often overlooks local cultural values. The conclusion of this study underscores the importance of collaboration between customary law and formal law to enhance the effectiveness of agrarian dispute resolution and provides policy recommendations for the government to strengthen harmony between these two legal systems.
References
REFERENCES
Aasoglenang, T. A., Bonye, S. Z., & Yiridomoh, G. Y. (2023). Framework for Building Synergies of the Traditional and Formal Political Adjudicatory Institutions in Conflict Resolution in North-Western Ghana. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2268974
Almeida, B., & Jacobs, C. (2022). Land Expropriation - The Hidden Danger of Climate Change Response in Mozambique. Land Use Policy, 123, 106408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106408
Astuti, R., Miller, M. A., McGregor, A., Sukmara, M. D. P., Saputra, W., Sulistyanto, & Taylor, D. (2022). Making Illegality Visible: The Governance Dilemmas Created by Visualising Illegal Palm Oil Plantations in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 114, 105942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105942
Baha Ul, H., Badshah, I., Rehman, A., Ullah, S., & Khan, U. (2023). Dareemat: A Mechanism of Arbitration and Dispute Resolution Among Pashtuns in Zhob, Pakistan. Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis, 55(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/27706869.2023.2188016
Bakker, L. (2023). Custom and Violence in Indonesia’s Protracted Land Conflict. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100624
Chang Hoon, O., Shin, J., & Ho, S. S. H. (2023). Conflicts Between Mining Companies and Communities: Institutional Environments and Conflict Resolution Approaches. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(2), 638–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12522
Forsyth, M. (2024). Opportunities for Peace and Non Violence in the Papua New Guinea Highlands. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 3(2), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/jacpr-09-2024-0939
Geyer, H. S. (2023). Conflicts and Synergies Between Customary Land Use Management and Urban Planning in Informal Settlements. Land Use Policy, 125, 106459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106459
Haridison, A. (2024). Why Did the Common Objective Be Biased in the Execution Collaborative Governance Program? The Case from Dayak Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 140, 107050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107050
Ibrahim, A. S., Abubakari, M., Akanbang, B. A. A., & Kepe, T. (2022). Resolving Land Conflicts Through Alternative Dispute Resolution: Exploring the Motivations and Challenges in Ghana. Land Use Policy, 120, 106272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106272
Joireman, S. F., & Tchatchoua-Djomo, R. (2023). Post-Conflict Restitution of Customary Land: Guidelines and Trajectories of Change. World Development, 168, 106272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106272
Kant, S., & Vertinsky, I. (2022). The Anatomy of Social Capital of a Canadian Indigenous Community: Implications of Social Trust Field Experiments for Community-Based Forest Management. Forest Policy and Economics, 144, 102822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102822
Klein, B. I. (2022). Local Institutions and Artisanal Mining: Governance forms in the Goldfields of Madagascar. Journal of Rural Studies, 92, 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.03.030
Kurnia, G., Setiawan, I., Tridakusumah, A. C., Jaelani, G., Heryanto, M. A., & Nugraha, A. (2022). Local Wisdom for Ensuring Agriculture Sustainability: A Case from Indonesia. Sustainability, 14(14), 8823. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148823
Kurniawan, K. F. B., Dharmawan, A. H., Sumarti, T., & Maksum, M. (2024). Territorialization of Plantation Concessions: Customary Land Acquisition Process, Agrarian Fragmentation and Social Resistance. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2367259. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2367259
Lawrence, R., & O’Faircheallaigh, C. (2022). Ignorance as Strategy: ‘Shadow Places’ and the Social Impacts of the Ranger Uranium Mine. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 93, 106723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106723
Lingaas, C. (2022). Indigenous Customary Law and Norwegian Domestic Law: Scenes of a (Complementary or Mutually Exclusive) Marriage? Laws, 11(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11020019
Marlina, & Mulyadi, M. (2024). Building Restorative Justice in Gampong as a Bottom-Up Legitimisation of the Protection of Children in Conflict with the Law in Indonesia: Case Study in Aceh. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2347410. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2347410
McCarthy, J. F., Dhiaulhaq, A., Afiff, S., & Robinson, K. (2022). Land Reform Rationalities and Their Governance Effects in Indonesia: Provoking Land Politics or Addressing Adverse Formalisation? Geoforum, 132, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.04.008
Molnár, Z., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Schunko, C., Teixidor-Toneu, I., Jarić, I., Díaz-Reviriego, I., Ivascu, C., Babai, D., Sáfián, L., Karlsen, P., Dai, H., & Hill, R. (2023). Social Justice for Traditional Knowledge Holders Will Help Conserve Europe’s Nature. Biological Conservation, 285, 110190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110190
Naime, J., Angelsen, A., Molina-Garzón, A., Carrilho, C. D., Selviana, V., Demarchi, G., Duchelle, A. E., & Martius, C. (2022). Enforcement and Inequality in Collective PES to Reduce Tropical Deforestation: Effectiveness, Efficiency and Equity Implications. Global Environmental Change, 74, 102520. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2022.102520
Nugroho, H. Y. S. H., Skidmore, A., & Hussin, Y. A. (2022). Verifying Indigenous Based-Claims to Forest Rights Using Image Interpretation and Spatial Analysis: A Case Study in Gunung Lumut Protection Forest, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. GeoJournal, 87(1), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10260-x
Sopaheluwakan, W. R. I., Fatem, S. M., Kutanegara, P. M., & Maryudi, A. (2023). Two-Decade Decentralization and Recognition of Customary Forest Rights: Cases from Special Autonomy Policy in West Papua, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 151, 102951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.102951
Wardi, U., Yaswirman, Y., Ismail, I., & Gafnel, G. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Islamic Family Law and Customary Law in the Settlement of Inheritance Disputes in Indonesia. Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies, 3(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.57255/hakamain.v3i1.330
Zurnetti, A., & Muliati, N. (2022). Customary Criminal Law Policy on Domestic Violence Settlement Through Restorative Justice. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2090083. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2090083
