Legal Protection for Gig Economy Workers from the Perspective of Labor Law in Indonesia

Authors

  • Indra Universitas Bangka Belitung, Kabupaten Bangka, Kepulauan Bangka Belitung, Indonesia, 33172
  • Sefti Afi Nawangsari Universitas Borobudur, Kota Jakarta Timur, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta, Indonesia, 13620

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v3i1.2289

Keywords:

Gig Economy, Legal Protection, Workforce, Regulation, Worker Status

Abstract

The gig economy has experienced rapid growth in Indonesia, with a rising number of platform-based workers engaged through digital platforms such as Gojek, Grab, Shopee, and Tokopedia. However, the legal status of gig workers remains unclear, leading to weak labor protections, particularly in terms of access to social security and compliance with minimum wage standards. This study aims to analyze the legal protection available for gig workers in Indonesia and identify regulatory reforms necessary to improve their welfare. Using a normative juridical and empirical approach, the research examines existing labor regulations and conducts a survey involving 300 gig workers in the transportation, logistics, and digital service sectors. The findings reveal that 60% of gig workers lack social security coverage, 70% do not receive wages that meet minimum standards, and only 20% have formal employment contracts. Furthermore, 72% of workers report income instability, while 85% express the need for clearer regulations to safeguard their rights. The study highlights that the ambiguous legal status of gig workers in Indonesia contributes to high job insecurity and significant disparities in labor protection compared to formal sector employees. Therefore, more adaptive regulatory reforms are needed to ensure that gig workers receive legal protection equivalent to that of workers in the formal sector. The findings of this study are expected to serve as a foundation for policymakers in designing more inclusive and responsive labor regulations that address the evolving dynamics of employment in the digital era.

References

Abd Samad, K., Abd Rahman, N. H., Ismail, S., & Marmaya, N. H. (2023). Is the Well-Being of Gig Workers in Malaysia Better? the Reality of Pain and Gain. International Review of Applied Economics, 37(4), 518–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2023.2240243

Aloisi, A. (2022). Platform Work in Europe: Lessons Learned, Legal Developments and Challenges Ahead. Sage Journals, 13(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525211062557

Behl, A., Rajagopal, K., Sheorey, P., & Mahendra, A. (2022). Barriers to Entry of Gig Workers in the Gig Platforms: Exploring the Dark Side of the Gig Economy. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 74(5), 818–839. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-08-2021-0235

Chalermpong, S., Kato, H., Thaithatkul, P., Ratanawaraha, A., Fillone, A., Hoang-Tung, N., & Jittrapirom, P. (2023). Ride-Hailing Applications in Southeast Asia: A Literature Review. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 17(3), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2022.2032885

Chen, T., Song, W., Song, J., Ren, Y., Dong, Y., Yang, J., & Zhang, S. (2022). Measuring Well-Being of Migrant Gig Workers: Exampled as Hangzhou City in China. Behavioral Sciences, 12(10), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12100365

Doellgast, V., & Wagner, I. (2022). Collective Regulation and the Future of Work in the Digital Economy: Insights from Comparative Employment Relations. Journal of Industrial Relations, 64(3), 438–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856221101165

Huang, Y. (2022). ‘Strong Regulations’ of China’s Platform Economy: A Preliminary Assessment. China Economic Journal, 15(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2022.2067687

Ikhtiariza, D., Fidiyati, E., & Fitriyah, L. (2024). Perlindungan Hak Pekerja Lepas Dalam Hukum Ketenagakerjaan. Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 09–15. https://doi.org/10.59435/jurdikum.v2i1.375

Inversi, C., Dundon, T., & Buckley, L. A. (2023). Work in the Gig-Economy: The Role of the State and Non-State Actors Ceding and Seizing Regulatory Space. Work, Employment and Society, 37(5), 1279–1298. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221080387

Kossek, E. E., & Kelliher, C. (2023). Making Flexibility More I-Deal: Advancing Work-Life Equality Collectively. Group and Organization Management, 48(1), 317–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221098823

MacEachen, E., de Rijk, A., Dyreborg, J., Fassier, J. B., Fletcher, M., Hopwood, P., Koivusalo, M., Majowicz, S., Meyer, S., Ståhl, C., & Welti, F. (2022). Laws, Policies, and Collective Agreements Protecting Low-wage and Digital Platform Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. New Solutions, 32(3), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911221133796

Marmo, M., Sinopoli, E. A., & Guo, S. (2022). Worker Exploitation in the Australian Gig Economy: Emerging Mechanisms of Social Control. Griffith Law Review, 31(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2022.2076036

Newlands, G. (2024). ‘This Isn’t Forever for Me’: Perceived Employability and Migrant Gig Work in Norway and Sweden. Environment and Planning A, 56(4), 1262–1279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x221083021

Nilsen, M., Kongsvik, T., & Antonsen, S. (2022). Taming Proteus: Challenges for Risk Regulation of Powerful Digital Labor Platforms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10), 6196. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106196

Prasetyo, E. H. (2024). Digital Platforms’ Strategies in Indonesia: Navigating between Technology and Informal Economy. Technology in Society, 76, 102414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102414

Ravizki, E. N., & Purnami, N. S. A. (2023). Guardians of Autonomy: A Comparative Analysis of Safeguarding Independent Self-Employed Workers in Indonesia and Europe. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 2273956. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2273956

Riani, R., Luthfianti, Z., Safitri, S., & Ayu, L. (2022). The Impact of Self-Efficacy and Job Crafting on Job Satisfaction of Gig Workers: An Empirical Study from Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(3), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2022.vol9.no3.0159

Sridhar, V., Lohani, B., Parthasarathy, B., & Mudliar, P. (2024). Modelling and Analysis of the Market Dynamics and Regulation of Online Gig Work. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 27(1), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-04-2024-006610.1108/dprg-04-2024-0066

Tandon, A., & Rathi, A. (2022). Sustaining Urban Labour Markets: Situating Migration and Domestic Work in India’s ‘Gig’ Economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 56(4), 1245–1261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221120822

Taylor, K., Van Dijk, P., Newnam, S., & Sheppard, D. (2023). Physical and Psychological Hazards in the Gig Economy System: A Systematic Review. Safety Science, 166, 106234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106234

Van Doorn, N., Ferrari, F., & Graham, M. (2023). Migration and Migrant Labour in the Gig Economy: An Intervention. Work, Employment and Society, 37(4), 1099–1111. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221096581

Wang, Q., Chen, Y., & Yang, Y. (2024). Unpacking the Legal Status of Platform Workers in China: An Empirical Analysis of Judicial Attitudes and Challenges in the Food Delivery Sector. Asia Pacific Law Review, 32(1), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2023.2233222

Wheelahan, L., & Moodie, G. (2022). Gig Qualifications for the Gig Economy: Micro-Credentials and the “Hungry Mile.” Higher Education, 83(6), 1279–1295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00742-3

Worth, N., & Karaagac, E. A. (2022). Accounting for Absences and Ambiguities in the Freelancing Labour Relation. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 113(1), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12491

Wulansari, A. D., Novianto, A., Keban, Y. T., & Hernawan, A. (2024). Hiding Behind the Platform: The Myth of Flexibility for Gig Workers in Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 32(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828x.2023.2292101

Zhang, C. (2022). Sharing Economy: Challenges for the Labor Market and the Labor Law in China and Globally: A Micro-Comparative Analysis of the EU, US, and Asia. European Business Organization Law Review, 23(4), 1025–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-022-00254-2

Zhou, Y. (2024). Trapped in The Platform: Migration and Precarity in China’s Platform-Based Gig Economy. Environment and Planning A, 56(4), 1195–1210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x221119196

Published

2025-02-19

How to Cite

Indra, & Nawangsari, S. A. (2025). Legal Protection for Gig Economy Workers from the Perspective of Labor Law in Indonesia. Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Sosial, 3(1), 937–954. https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v3i1.2289