Legal Issues in the Oversight and Enforcement of Advocate Professional Ethics in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v3i1.2300Keywords:
Advocate Ethics Enforcement , Legal Profession Oversight , Regulatory Transparency, Independent Legal Monitoring , Digital Oversight MechanismsAbstract
The oversight and enforcement of the advocate code of ethics in Indonesia continue to face various challenges, affecting the effectiveness of existing regulations. The number of ethical violations among advocates has increased significantly, rising from 120 cases in 2018 to 345 cases in 2023. The most common infractions include conflicts of interest, abuse of authority, and gratuities. One of the primary factors contributing to weak ethical enforcement is the current oversight system, which remains limited to advocate organizations without the involvement of an independent regulatory body. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of advocate oversight mechanisms in Indonesia, compare them with best practices in other jurisdictions, and identify measures to enhance accountability and transparency in the legal profession. The research employs a normative legal method with a comparative law approach and empirical studies. The analysis includes an examination of existing regulations, case reports on ethical violations, and interviews with key stakeholders, including advocates, clients, and legal analysts. The findings indicate that only 40% of reported violations result in strict sanctions, while only 10% of advocates found guilty of ethical breaches face license revocation. Additionally, a survey of 500 respondents reveals that only 35% of the public is aware of the procedures for filing complaints against unethical advocates, highlighting a lack of transparency in the oversight system. This study contributes to the discourse by recommending the establishment of an independent regulatory body to monitor advocate compliance with ethical standards and the enhanced utilization of digital technology in the oversight system. With more transparent and accountable regulatory reforms, ethical violations within the legal profession can be minimized, ultimately strengthening public trust in Indonesia’s legal system.
References
Ali, M., Muliyono, A., & Nurhidayat, S. (2023). The Application of a Human Rights Approach toward Crimes of Corruption: Analyzing Anti-Corruption Regulations and Judicial Decisions. Laws, 12(4), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12040068
Alkhaldi, M., Asi, Y., AlBada, M., & Mansour, W. (2024). Rethinking and Advancing the Movement of Resistance, Activism, and Advocacy in Health in Four Central Arenas of the Middle East Region. World Medical and Health Policy, 16(4), 692–708. https://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.633
Alqodsi, E. M., & Gura, D. (2023). High Tech and Legal Challenges: Artificial Intelligence-Caused Damage Regulation. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 2270751. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2270751
Barron, A., & Skountridaki, L. (2020). Toward a Professions-Based Understanding of Ethical and Responsible Lobbying. Business & Society, 61(2), 340–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320975023
Bedera, N. (2022). The Illusion of Choice: Organizational Dependency and the Neutralization of University Sexual Assault Complaints. Law and Policy, 44(3), 208–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12194
Cheffins, B. R., & Reddy, B. V. (2022). Thirty Years and Done–Time to Abolish the UK Corporate Governance Code. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 22(2), 709–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2022.2140496
Dela Rama, M. J., Lester, M. E., & Staples, W. (2022). The Challenges of Political Corruption in Australia, the Proposed Commonwealth Integrity Commission Bill (2020) and the Application of the APUNCAC. Laws, 11(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11010007
Faber, S. C., Wu, E., & Bartlett, A. (2023). Abuse of Power in the Disciplinary Actions of a State Psychology Licensing Board: Inequitable Outcomes And Early Career Psychologists. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1184528. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1184528
Hook, J., & Fines, I. (2023). The Experience of Making a Complaint in a Case Of Professional Sexual Misconduct: Towards a Safer Profession. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 37(3), 206–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02668734.2023.2199821
Iristian, Y. (2024). Ensuring Administrative Legality and Justice Through Judicial Review in Indonesia. Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research, 2(3), 214–234. https://doi.org/10.62504/jimr390
Korkea-aho, E. (2022). Are Lawyer-Lobbyists Answerable to ‘a Higher Authority’? Bar Association Rules as Lobbying Regulation in the EU and the USA. Interest Groups and Advocacy, 11(4), 569–589. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-022-00169-w
Levi, M. (2022). Lawyers as Money Laundering Enablers? An Evolving and Contentious Relationship. Global Crime, 23(2), 126–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2022.2089122
Ligtenberg, W., Stolper, M., & Molewijk, B. (2024). Ethics Support For Ethics Support: The Development of the Confidentiality Compass for Dealing with Moral Challenges Concerning (Breaching) Confidentiality in Moral Case Deliberation. BMC Medical Ethics, 25(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01039-7
Lubis, F., Harahap, A. A., Wira, A., Tarigan, Y., Mutia, A., Nst, A., Tasya, A., Cahara, D., & Kaharuddin, M. (2025). The Role of Advocates in Upholding the Principles of Justice in Judicial Institutions. Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(2), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.58471/justi.v15i02
Mahardhika, R., Sumarwanto, E., & Rosa, E. M. (2023). Complaint Management Strategy in Dealing with Allegations of Malpractice in the Digital Age. Amalee: Indonesian Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 4(2), 627–644. https://doi.org/10.37680/amalee.v4i2.3238
Mukhtar, & Lailam, T. (2023). Accountability and Transparency of the Electronic Court and Litigation Systems in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, 39(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v39i2.32552
Murray, B. J., Copeland, V., & Dettlaff, A. J. (2023). Reflections on the Ethical Possibilities and Limitations of Abolitionist Praxis in Social Work. Affilia - Feminist Inquiry in Social Work, 38(4), 742–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/08861099221146151
Pattavina, A., Long, J. S., Petrich, D. M., M. Byrne, J., Cullen, F. T., & Taxman, F. S. (2024). Revisiting the Effectiveness of HOPE/Swift-Certain-Fair Supervision Programs: A Meta-Analytic Review. Criminology and Public Policy, 23(1), 45–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12635
Prayuti, Y., Arini, Y., & Risdiana, Y. (2025). The Legal Liability of Beauty Clinics in Achieving Justice for Consumers. Mimbar Keadilan, 18(1), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v18i1.12271
Santri Dewi Rambe, E., Mintarsih, M., & Balai Rakyat Kel Utan Kayu -East Jakarta Indonesia, J. (2024). Misconduct in The Judicial Process: Advocates as Bribery Offenders. Uniska Law Review, 5(1), 32–62. https://doi.org/10.32503/ulr.v5i1.5809
Sudibyo, A. W., & Santiago, F. (2024). Legal Reconstruction of the Police Code of Ethics in Strengthening Sanctions against Members Involved in Narcotics Abuse. Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean, 1(6), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.70177/ijmsa.v1i6.1823
Suh, J. (2023). Human Rights and Corruption in Settling the Accounts of the Past: Transitional Justice Experiences from the Philippines, South Korea, and Indonesia. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 179(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-BJA10049
Syed, R. F. (2023). Compliance with and Enforcement Mechanism of Labor Law: Cost-Benefits Analysis from Employers’ Perspective in Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 12(2), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-023-00179-0
Tezuka, H., & Koeda, M. (2023). Exploring the Future of Commercial Dispute Resolution in Asia: Accelerating Efficiency and Effectiveness in ADR. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 10(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2021.32
Timofeev, I. N. (2022). Britain’s Sanctions Policy: Institutional Design and Targeting Russia. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 92(4), S504–S511. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1019331622120103
Zafar, A. (2024). Balancing the Scale: Navigating Ethical and Practical Challenges of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Integration in Legal Practices. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00121-8
Zahra, S., Azizan, A., Sophia, S., & Perai, N. (2024). Reforming Indonesian Criminal Justice: Integrating Recidivism Risk Assessment for Fair and Effective Sentencing. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 13(2), 275–310. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.13.2.2024.275-310
3.png)
