The Socio-Legal Implications of Digital Death and Data Inheritance

Authors

  • Yanti Desi Imala Politeknik Kesejahteraan Sosial Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia.
  • Finda Novrianda Politeknik Kesejahteraan Sosial Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia.
  • Fino Gani Sujito Politeknik Kesejahteraan Sosial Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia.
  • Leni Axelasia Politeknik Kesejahteraan Sosial Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/n5e2hw14

Keywords:

Digital Death, Data Inheritance, Socio-legal Framework, Postmortem Rights, Digital Legacy

Abstract

Digital identity after biological death raises significant questions regarding the question of ownership, access, and inheritance of data. Objects of digital properties, to include social media profiles, cloud storage, and online transaction histories, are now practically inseparable from personal identity. However, these questions regarding accessing postmortem data are still underdeveloped in legal and policy terms. The objective of this study is to investigate the socio-legal implications of digital death using the interplay of social norms, legal systems, and digital platform policies. The qualitative exploratory case study method was used to collect data employing semi-structured interviews with bereaved families, legal specialists, and representatives from technology platforms. Hematic analysis yields five core findings: legal access generally requires court orders; public awareness of digital inheritance is minimal; jurisdictional variation creates confusion; digital accounts are memorialized spaces; and there are ethical tensions between postmortem privacy and family rights. The study concludes that social norms currently develop more responsively than legal or technical systems, with the result being informal but risky practices on the part of families. This research contributes an integrative socio-legal framework to guide inclusive and ethical digital inheritance policy. It requires harmonized law, public literacy, and cross-platform collaboration to maintain human dignity and digital rights after death. 

References

Althea Serafim Kriswandaru, Berliant Pratiwi, & Suwardi Suwardi. (2024). Efektivitas Kebijakan Perlindungan Data Pribadi di Indonesia: Analisis Hukum Perdata dengan Pendekatan Studi Kasus. Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Sosial, 2(4), 740–756. https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v2i4.2157

Bailey, C., Guo, P., MacArtney, J., Finucane, A., Swan, S., Meade, R., & Wagstaff, E. (2022). The Experiences of Informal Carers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13455. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013455

Bala, P., Nisi, V., & Nunes, N. J. (2024). Stories as Boundary Objects: Digital Storytelling with Migrant Communities for Heritage Discourses. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3641016

Bertolaccini, L., Falcoz, P. E., Brunelli, A., Batirel, H., Furak, J., Passani, S., & Szanto, Z. (2023). The Significance of General Data Protection Regulation in the Compliant Data Contribution to the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 64(3), 289. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezad289

Chen, L., Yi, J., Li, S., & Tong, T. W. (2022). Platform Governance Design in Platform Ecosystems: Implications for Complementors’ Multihoming Decision. Journal of Management, 48(3), 630–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320988337

Cioffi, J. W., Kenney, M. F., & Zysman, J. (2022). Platform Power and Regulatory Politics: Polanyi for the Twenty-First Century. New Political Economy, 27(5), 820–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2022.2027355

Dinneen, J. D., Krtalić, M., Davoudi, N., Hellmich, H., Ochsner, C., & Bressel, P. (2024). Information Science and the Inevitable: A Literature Review at the Intersection of Death and Information Management: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) Paper. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 75(3), 268–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24861

Durrant, L. J., Vadher, A. N., & Teller, J. (2023). Disaster Risk Management and Cultural Heritage: The Perceptions of European World Heritage Site Managers on Disaster Risk Management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 89, 103625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103625

Fukami, Y., & Shimizu, T. (2021). Technology Standardization for Innovation: How Google Leverages an Open Digital Platform. Information, 12(11), 441. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12110441

Gallistl, V., Rohner, R., Hengl, L., & Kolland, F. (2021). Doing Digital Exclusion – Technology Practices of Older Internet Non-Users. Journal of Aging Studies, 59, 100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100973

Gawer, A. (2021). Digital Platforms and Ecosystems: Remarks on the Dominant Organizational Forms of the Digital Age. Innovation: Organization & Management, 24(1), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1965888

Giglitto, D., Ciolfi, L., & Bosswick, W. (2021). Building a Bridge: Opportunities and Challenges for Intangible Cultural Heritage at the Intersection of Institutions, Civic Society, and Migrant Communities. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 28(1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2021.1922934

Harracá, M., Castelló, I., & Gawer, A. (2023). How Digital Platforms Organize Immaturity: A Sociosymbolic Framework of Platform Power. Business Ethics Quarterly, 33(3), 440–472. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2022.40

Hollanek, T., & Nowaczyk-Basińska, K. (2024). Griefbots, Deadbots, Postmortem Avatars: on Responsible Applications of Generative AI in the Digital Afterlife Industry. Philosophy and Technology, 37(63), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00744-w

Kohl, U. (2022). What Post-Mortem Privacy May Teach Us About Privacy. Computer Law & Security Review, 47, 105737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105737

Kohl, U. (2023). The Right To Be Forgotten in Data Protection Law and Two Western Cultures of Privacy. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 72(3), 737–769. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589323000258

Lian, Y., & Xie, J. (2024). The Evolution of Digital Cultural Heritage Research: Identifying Key Trends, Hotspots, and Challenges through Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 16(16), 7125. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167125

McKellar, K., Sillence, E., Neave, N., & Briggs, P. (2023). Digital Accumulation Behaviours and Information Management in the Workplace: Exploring the Tensions Between Digital Data Hoarding, Organisational Culture and Policy. Behaviour and Information Technology, 43(6), 1206–1218. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2023.2205970

Morse, T. (2023). Digital Necromancy: Users’ Perceptions of Digital Afterlife and Posthumous Communication Technologies. Information Communication and Society, 27(2), 240–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2023.2205467

Morse, T., & Birnhack, M. (2022). The Posthumous Privacy Paradox: Privacy Preferences and Behavior Regarding Digital Remains. New Media and Society, 24(6), 1343–1362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820974955

Morse, T., & Birnhack, M. (2024). The Continuity Principle of Digital Remains. New Media and Society, 26(9), 5240–5258. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221133535

Münster, S., Utescher, R., & Ulutas Aydogan, S. (2021). Digital Topics on Cultural Heritage Investigated: How Can Data-Driven and Data-Guided Methods Support the Identification of Current Topics and Trends in Digital Heritage? Built Heritage, 5(25), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-021-00045-7

Polii, V., Julius, D., & Banaya, C. L. (2025). Legal Protection of Personal Data Privacy in the Digital Era: A Comparative Study between Indonesia and ASEAN Countries. Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Sosial, 3(2), 1194–1206. https://doi.org/10.51903/yjyvvy47

Ravi Arda, Deva Christian, & Wirawan Jati Raga. (2025). Restorative Justice for Online Hate Speech: A Socio-Legal Framework. Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Sosial, 3(2), 1179–1193. https://doi.org/10.51903/zywfje63

Sari, N. G. (2024). Kewarisan Tanah Pusako Tinggi dalam Perspektif Hukum Adat dan Hukum Islam. Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 2(3), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.51903/jaksa.v2i3.1878

Selfridge, M., & Mitchell, L. M. (2021). Social Media as Moral Laboratory: Street Involved Youth, Death and Grief. Journal of Youth Studies, 24(4), 531–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2020.1746758

Selman, L. E., Chamberlain, C., Sowden, R., Chao, D., Selman, D., Taubert, M., & Braude, P. (2021). Sadness, Despair and Anger When a Patient Dies Alone from COVID-19: A Thematic Content Analysis of Twitter Data From Bereaved Family Members and Friends. Palliative Medicine, 35(7), 1267–1276. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163211017026

Sen, K., Prybutok, G., & Prybutok, V. (2022). The Use of Digital Technology for Social Wellbeing Reduces Social Isolation in Older Adults: A Systematic Review. SSM - Population Health, 17, 101020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.101020

Shi, B., Huang, W., Dang, Y., & Zhou, W. (2024). Leveraging Social Media Data for Pandemic Detection and Prediction. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1075), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03589-y

Sinatra, C., Monteiro, J. M., & Tupen, R. R. (2024). Efektivitas Penerapan Aturan Laporan Harta Kekayaan dalam Menjamin Transparansi Harta Kekayaan Perangkat Daerah Pemerintah Kabupaten Sumba Timur. Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 2(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.51903/perkara.v2i2.1865

Spiti, J. M., Davies, E., McLiesh, P., & Kelly, J. (2022). How Social Media Data are Being Used to Research the Experience of Mourning: A Scoping Review. PLoS ONE, 17(7), e0271034. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271034

Stanley, S., Higginbotham, K., Finucane, A., & Nwosu, A. C. (2023). A Grounded Theory Study Exploring Palliative Care Healthcare Professionals’ Experiences of Managing Digital Legacy as Part of Advance Care Planning for People Receiving Palliative Care. Palliative Medicine, 37(9), 1424–1433. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163231194198

Terras, M., Coleman, S., Drost, S., Elsden, C., Helgason, I., Lechelt, S., Osborne, N., Panneels, I., Pegado, B., Schafer, B., Smyth, M., Thornton, P., & Speed, C. (2021). The Value of Mass-Digitised Cultural Heritage Content in Creative Contexts. Big Data and Society, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211006165

Turculet, G. (2023). Data Feminism and Border Ethics: Power, Invisibility and Indeterminacy. Journal of Global Ethics, 19(3), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2023.2278533

Yosepha, D., Natonis, H., Perempuan, K. A., Harta, P., Berdasarkan, W., Waris, H., Timor, A., Di, A., Fatuulan, D., Ki’, K., Timor, K., Selatan, T., Nubatonis, O. J., & Jacob, Y. M. Y. (2024). Kedudukan Anak Perempuan dalam Pembagian Harta Warisan Berdasarkan Hukum Waris Adat Timor Amanuban di Desa Fatuulan Kecamatan Ki’e Kabupaten Timor Tengah Selatan. Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 2(2), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.51903/perkara.v2i2.1846

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): HAKIM: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Yanti Desi Imala, Finda Novrianda, Fino Gani Sujito, Leni Axelasia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

The Socio-Legal Implications of Digital Death and Data Inheritance. (2025). Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Sosial, 3(3), 1263-1275. https://doi.org/10.51903/n5e2hw14