Integrating Generative AI and ChatGPT in Design Education: Impacts on Critical Thinking Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i1.2536Keywords:
ChatGPT, Critical Thinking, Creative Pedagogy, Design Education, Generative AIAbstract
The integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI), and more particularly ChatGPT, into design education has brought about opportunities and challenges in developing critical thinking among students. As the design discipline increasingly intersects with emerging technologies, educators must take into account the implications of AI-powered tools on cultivating essential cognitive skills. The aim of this study is to investigate the implications of generative AI and ChatGPT on the critical thinking of design students in educational contexts. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative data from pre- and post-intervention surveys with qualitative data from reflective diaries and focus group discussions. The subjects of the study were students majoring in visual communication design who utilized ChatGPT and generative AI tools throughout the semester. The findings attest to the improvement in critical thinking capability in problem definition, conceptualization, and self-reflection. In addition, the study affirmatively confirms that use of AI guided by others—additive to formal learning structures—may enable students' autonomy and creative thinking without reducing their creativity. These results suggest that generative AI, as an adjunct incorporated curriculally in strategic ways, could act as a pedagogical catalyst for advancing students' ability to think higher-order. This present study is part of the new debate concerning AI education in two essential ways: first, by means of a model of efficient application of generative AI by morals-based models. Research in the future will have to consider long-term effects and cross-disciplinary usage to further pedagogical strategies.
References
AlNajdi, S. M. (2022). The effectiveness of using augmented reality (AR) to enhance student performance: using quick response (QR) codes in student textbooks in the Saudi education system. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(3), 1105–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10100-4
Bandi, A., Adapa, P. V. S. R., & Kuchi, Y. E. V. P. K. (2023). The Power of Generative AI: A Review of Requirements, Models, Input–Output Formats, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges. Future Internet 2023, Vol. 15, Page 260, 15(8), 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15080260
Bengesi, S., El-Sayed, H., Sarker, M. K., Houkpati, Y., Irungu, J., & Oladunni, T. (2024). Advancements in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Review of GANs, GPT, Autoencoders, Diffusion Model, and Transformers. IEEE Access, 12, 69812–69837. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3397775
Bhattacharya, P., Prasad, V. K., Verma, A., Gupta, D., Sapsomboon, A., Viriyasitavat, W., & Dhiman, G. (2024). Demystifying ChatGPT: An In-depth Survey of OpenAI’s Robust Large Language Models. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 2024 31:8, 31(8), 4557–4600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-024-10115-5
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Conceptual and Design Thinking for Thematic Analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
Burke, K., & Larmar, S. (2021). Acknowledging another face in the virtual crowd: Reimagining the online experience in higher education through an online pedagogy of care. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(5), 601–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2020.1804536
Cáceres, M., Nussbaum, M., & Ortiz, J. (2020). Integrating critical thinking into the classroom: A teacher’s perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100674
Chaka, C. (2023). Fourth industrial revolution—a review of applications, prospects, and challenges for artificial intelligence, robotics and blockchain in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 18, 002–002. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18002
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2988510
Costa, R. D., Souza, G. F., Valentim, R. A. M., & Castro, T. B. (2020). The theory of learning styles applied to distance learning. Cognitive Systems Research, 64, 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2020.08.004
Cropley, A. (2020). Creativity-focused Technology Education in the Age of Industry 4.0. Creativity Research Journal, 32(2), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1751546
Dahri, N. A., Yahaya, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Vighio, M. S., Alblehai, F., Soomro, R. B., & Shutaleva, A. (2024). Investigating AI-based academic support acceptance and its impact on students’ performance in Malaysian and Pakistani higher education institutions. Education and Information Technologies, 29(14), 18695–18744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12599-x
Dimitriadou, E., & Lanitis, A. (2023). A critical evaluation, challenges, and future perspectives of using artificial intelligence and emerging technologies in smart classrooms. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40561-023-00231-3
Enholm, I. M., Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Business Value: a Literature Review. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(5), 1709–1734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10186-w
Fleischmann, K. (2024). Making the case for introducing generative artificial intelligence (AI) into design curricula. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 23(Thriving Futures: Papers from The Australian Council of University Art & Design Schools), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00088_1
Gao, W., Mei, Y., Duh, H., & Zhou, Z. (2024). Envisioning the incorporation of Generative Artificial Intelligence into future product design education: Insights from practitioners, educators, and students. The Design Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2024.2435703
Guo, Y., & Lee, D. (2023). Leveraging ChatGPT for Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(12), 4876–4883. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00505
Hooda, M., Rana, C., Dahiya, O., Rizwan, A., & Hossain, M. S. (2022). Artificial Intelligence for Assessment and Feedback to Enhance Student Success in Higher Education. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022(1), 5215722. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5215722
Kartal, G. (2024). The influence of ChatGPT on thinking skills and creativity of EFL student teachers: a narrative inquiry. Journal of Education for Teaching, 50(4), 627–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2024.2326502
Lazkani, O. (2024). Revolutionizing Education of Art and Design Through ChatGPT. Studies in Big Data, 144, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52280-2_4
Lemon, L. L., & Hayes, J. (2020). Enhancing trustworthiness of qualitative findings: Using leximancer for qualitative data analysis triangulation. Qualitative Report, 25(3), 604–614. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4222
Limna, P. (2023). The impact of NVivo in qualitative research: Perspectives from graduate students. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.17
Lin, X. (2024). Exploring the Role of ChatGPT as a Facilitator for Motivating Self-Directed Learning Among Adult Learners. Adult Learning, 35(3), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/10451595231184928
Liu, C., Hou, J., Tu, Y. F., Wang, Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). Incorporating a reflective thinking promoting mechanism into artificial intelligence-supported English writing environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5614–5632. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2012812
Mian, S. H., Salah, B., Ameen, W., Moiduddin, K., & Alkhalefah, H. (2020). Adapting Universities for Sustainability Education in Industry 4.0: Channel of Challenges and Opportunities. Sustainability 2020, Vol. 12, Page 6100, 12(15), 6100. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156100
Natow, R. S. (2020). The use of triangulation in qualitative studies employing elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 20(2), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119830077
Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7893–7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9
Prihatmoko, S., & Setiyadi, T. (2024). Enhancing Public Awareness of the Designer Profession: Visual Communication Strategies in Instagram Campaigns. International Journal of Graphic Design, 2(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v2i2.2113
Rafiq, A. A., Triyono, M. B., & Djatmiko, I. W. (2023). The Integration of Inquiry and Problem-Based Learning and Its Impact on Increasing the Vocational Student Involvement. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 659–684. https://e-iji.net/ats/index.php/pub/article/view/221
Rauscher, W., & Badenhorst, H. (2021). Thinking critically about critical thinking dispositions in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(3), 465–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10798-020-09564-3
Ruiz-Rojas, L. I., Salvador-Ullauri, L., & Acosta-Vargas, P. (2024). Collaborative Working and Critical Thinking: Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Higher Education. Sustainability 2024, Vol. 16, Page 5367, 16(13), 5367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135367
Santoni de Sio, F., & Mecacci, G. (2021). Four Responsibility Gaps with Artificial Intelligence: Why they Matter and How to Address them. Philosophy and Technology, 34(4), 1057–1084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00450-x
Sharma, P., Akgun, M., & Li, Q. (2023). Understanding student interaction and cognitive engagement in online discussions using social network and discourse analyses. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(5), 2631–2654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10261-w
Shaw, A., Liu, O. L., Gu, L., Kardonova, E., Chirikov, I., Li, G., Hu, S., Yu, N., Ma, L., Guo, F., Su, Q., Shi, J., Shi, H., & Loyalka, P. (2020). Thinking critically about critical thinking: validating the Russian HEIghten® critical thinking assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 45(9), 1933–1948. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672640
Shoufan, A. (2023). Exploring Students’ Perceptions of ChatGPT: Thematic Analysis and Follow-Up Survey. IEEE Access, 11, 38805–38818. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3268224
Silva Pacheco, C., & Iturra Herrera, C. (2021). A conceptual proposal and operational definitions of the cognitive processes of complex thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100794
Suriano, R., Plebe, A., Acciai, A., & Fabio, R. A. (2025). Student interaction with ChatGPT can promote complex critical thinking skills. Learning and Instruction, 95, 102011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102011
Vakkuri, V., Kemell, K. K., Jantunen, M., Halme, E., & Abrahamsson, P. (2021). ECCOLA — A method for implementing ethically aligned AI systems. Journal of Systems and Software, 182, 111067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.111067
Wagner, G., Lukyanenko, R., & Paré, G. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews. Journal of Information Technology, 37(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962211048201
Wang, Y. H. (2020). Design-based research on integrating learning technology tools into higher education classes to achieve active learning. Computers & Education, 156, 103935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103935
Weng, X., Chiu, T. K. F., & Tsang, C. C. (2022). Promoting student creativity and entrepreneurship through real-world problem-based maker education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, 101046. https://DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.TSC.2022.101046
Wong, G. K. W., Li, Y. K., & Lai, X. (2021). Visualizing the learning patterns of topic-based social interaction in online discussion forums: an exploratory study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(5), 2813–2843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10040-5
Xiao, Y., & Zhi, Y. (2023). An Exploratory Study of EFL Learners’ Use of ChatGPT for Language Learning Tasks: Experience and Perceptions. Languages 2023, Vol. 8, Page 212, 8(3), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030212
Yu, H. (2024). The application and challenges of ChatGPT in educational transformation: New demands for teachers’ roles. Heliyon, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24289
Yunianto, I., & Wahyudi, W. (2024). Designing User Experience for a Mobile Application for Agricultural Product Marketing Using the Human-Centered Design Method. International Journal of Graphic Design, 2(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v2i2.2123
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments 2024 11:1, 11(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Brian Otieno Ouma, Eliud Kamau Mwangi, adia Auma Okoth, Achieng Wanjiru Njeri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
5.png)
