Biophilic, Ethical, and Low-Carbon Design Integration in Visual Communication for Social Media Campaigns
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i2.2828Keywords:
Biophilic Design, Ethical Visual Communication, Law-Carbon Strategy, Sustainable Media, Social Media CampaignsAbstract
This study aims to develop an integrative model that unites biophilic aesthetics, ethical storytelling, and low-carbon design strategies into a single sustainable framework for digital communication. Using a qualitative multi-case approach, the research draws on semi-structured interviews with six expert designers and content analysis of ten social media campaigns selected for their ecological or ethical orientation. The analysis applied thematic coding and visual evaluation to identify recurring patterns and design challenges. Findings show that while nature-inspired and ethically grounded visuals are increasingly employed to foster emotional connection and inclusivity, explicit low-carbon design practices remain rare due to limited awareness and measurement tools. The study introduces a practical framework linking environmental psychology, design ethics, and digital sustainability. Its novelty lies in demonstrating that aesthetic engagement and ecological responsibility.
References
Aldieri, L., Kaplí, O., Bonenberg, W., Bonenberg, A., Słyk, J., Mohammed, I., Onur, Z., Gdem, Ç. ˘, & Gnan, Ç. ˘. (2023). An Exploration of Biophilic Design Features within Preschool Interiors. Sustainability, 15(15), 11913. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511913
Bertolini, A., Conte, F., Siano, A., & Marongiu, F. (2023). Digital Communication of Conscientious Brands: Case Studies. Sustainability, 15(21), 15378. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115378
Besana, N., Krogh, P. G., Petersen, M. G., & Spallazzo, D. (2024). Expanding the Concept of Sustainable Interaction Design: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 16(17), 7486. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177486
Bibri, S. E., Huang, J., Jagatheesaperumal, S. K., & Krogstie, J. (2024). The Synergistic Interplay of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twin in Environmentally Planning Sustainable Smart Cities: A Comprehensive Systematic Review. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 20, 100433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2024.100433
Bissett-Johnson, K., & Radcliffe, D. F. (2021). Engaging Engineering Students in Socially Responsible Design Using Global Projects. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1674785
Boehnert, J., Sinclair, M., & Dewberry, E. (2022). Sustainable and Responsible Design Education: Tensions in Transitions. Sustainability, 14(11), 6397. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116397
Bonamigo, A., Makhija, H., Theocharis, D., & Tsekouropoulos, G. (2025). Sustainable Consumption and Branding for Gen Z: How Brand Dimensions Influence Consumer Behavior and Adoption of Newly Launched Technological Products. Sustainability, 17(9), 4124. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17094124
Buckley, R. C. (2022). Sensory and Emotional Components in Tourist Memories of Wildlife Encounters: Intense, Detailed, and Long-Lasting Recollections of Individual Incidents. Sustainability, 14(8), 4460. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084460
Campos, N. A., Malafaia, G., Doretto, L. B., Rosa, I. F., Nóbrega, R. H., & Sueli de Lima Rodrigues, A. (2021). What Do Environmental Advertisers Say and How Does the Public Understand Them? Contributions to Education for Sustainability. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 4, 100160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2021.100160
Caputo, F., & Nabivi, E. (2025). The Role of Social Media in Green Marketing: How Eco-Friendly Content Influences Brand Attitude and Consumer Engagement. Sustainability, 17(5), 1965. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17051965
Carrero, I., Valor, C., Díaz, E., & Labajo, V. (2021). Designed to Be Noticed: A Reconceptualization of Carbon Food Labels as Warning Labels. Sustainability, 13(3), 1581. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031581
Dong, Y., Duan, H., Li, X., & Zhang, R. (2024). Influence of Different Forms on BIPV Gymnasium Carbon-Saving Potential Based on Energy Consumption and Solar Energy in Multi-Climate Zones. Sustainability, 16(4), 1656. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041656
Donia, J., & Shaw, J. A. (2021). Ethics and Values in Design: A Structured Review and Theoretical Critique. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(57), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00329-2
Doussard, C., Garbe, E., Morales, J., & Billion, J. (2024). Universal Design for the Workplace: Ethical Considerations Regarding the Inclusion of Workers with Disabilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 194, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05582-y
Harris, E., Franz, A., & O’Hara, S. (2023). Promoting Social Equity and Building Resilience through Value-Inclusive Design. Buildings, 13(8), 2081. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082081
Iqbal, S., N. Qureshi, A., Li, J., & Mahmood, T. (2023). On the Analyses of Medical Images Using Traditional Machine Learning Techniques and Convolutional Neural Networks. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 30, 3173–3233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-09899-9
Jamil, N., Belkacem, A. N., Ouhbi, S., & Guger, C. (2021). Cognitive and Affective Brain-computer interfaces for improving learning strategies and enhancing student capabilities: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access, 9, 134122–134147. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3115263
Ji, S., & Lin, P. S. (2022). Aesthetics of Sustainability: Research on the Design Strategies for Emotionally Durable Visual Communication Design. Sustainability, 14(8), 4649. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084649
Kujundzic, K., Stamatovic Vuckovic, S., & Radivojević, A. (2023). Toward Regenerative Sustainability: A Passive Design Comfort Assessment Method of Indoor Environment. Sustainability, 15(1), 840. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010840
Lefosse, D., van Timmeren, A., & Ratti, C. (2023). Biophilia Upscaling: A Systematic Literature Review Based on a Three-Metric Approach. Sustainability, 15(22), 15702. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215702
Liu, J., Huang, Z., Fan, M., Yang, J., Xiao, J., & Wang, Y. (2022). Future Energy Infrastructure, Energy Platform and Energy Storage. Nano Energy, 104, 107915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107915
Palanisamy, K., Lucchi, E., Liu, C., Sharples, S., & Mohammadpourkarbasi, H. (2023). A Review of Building Energy Retrofit Measures, Passive Design Strategies and Building Regulation for the Low Carbon Development of Existing Dwellings in the Hot Summer–Cold Winter Region of China. Energies, 16(10), 4115. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16104115
Pandiyan, P., Saravanan, S., Kannadasan, R., Krishnaveni, S., Alsharif, M. H., & Kim, M. K. (2024). A Comprehensive Review of Advancements in Green IoT for Smart Grids: Paving the Path to Sustainability. Energy Reports, 11, 5504–5531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.05.021
Pietroni, E., & Ferdani, D. (2021). Virtual Restoration and Virtual Reconstruction in Cultural Heritage: Terminology, Methodologies, Visual Representation Techniques and Cognitive Models. Information, 12(4), 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12040167
Pitidis, V., Coaffee, J., & Lima-Silva, F. (2024). Advancing equitable ‘resilience imaginaries’ in the Global South through dialogical participatory mapping: Experiences from informal communities in Brazil. Cities, 150, 105015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105015
Purhita, E. J., & Rudjiono, D. (2024). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Interactive Multimedia in Boosting Brand Equity: A Case Study of Visual Communication Design Programs. International Journal of Graphic Design, 2(2), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v2i2.2109
Rathee, S., & Milfeld, T. (2023). Sustainability Advertising: Literature Review and Framework for Future Research. International Journal of Advertising, 43(1), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2023.2175300
Richardson, M., & Butler, C. W. (2021). Nature Connectedness and Biophilic Design. Building Research & Information, 50(1–2), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2021.2006594
Romo-Avilés, N., Pavón-Benítez, L., & Tarancón Gómez, P. (2023). “Keeping Your Composure”: A Digital Ethnography of Gendered Alcohol Norms on Instagram. International Journal of Drug Policy, 112, 103936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103936
Saranya, K. N., Bhandari, M., Borad, N., Reddy, P. V. P., & Kumar, S. (2025). Surveying the Impact of Rarely Investigated Design Components on User Engagement. International Journal of Graphic Design, 3(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i1.2752
Silveira, P. D., Sandes, F. S., Xara-Brasil, D., & Menezes, K. (2024). Brands’ Green Activism: An Empirical Comparison between Posts of Digital Influencers and Brands. Sustainability, 16(16), 6863. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166863
Tabassum, R. R., & Park, J. (2024). Development of a Building Evaluation Framework for Biophilic Design in Architecture. Buildings, 14(10), 3254. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14103254
Taylor, R. P. (2021). The Potential of Biophilic Fractal Designs to Promote Health and Performance: A Review of Experiments and Applications. Sustainability, 13(2), 823. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020823
Tekin, B. H., & Urbano Gutiérrez, R. (2023). Human-Centred Health-Care Environments: A New Framework for Biophilic Design. Frontiers in Medical Technology, 5, 1219897. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2023.1219897
Tian, X., & Günther, T. (2022). A Survey of Smooth Vector Graphics: Recent Advances in Representation, Creation, Rasterization, and Image Vectorization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 30(3), 1652–1671. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2022.3220575
Weismayer, C., & Pezenka, I. (2024). Tracing Emotional Responses to Nature-Based Tourism Commercials and Tagging Individual Sequences. Tourism Recreation Research, 50(3), 663–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2024.2312348
Wibowo, M. C., Zainudin, A., & Sugiarto, S. (2024). The Influence of Minimalist Design Elements on Visual Preferences of Generation Z: A Quantitative Study. International Journal of Graphic Design, 2(2), 236–247. https://doi.org/0.51903/ijgd.v2i2.2133
Widdicks, K., Remy, C., Bates, O., Friday, A., & Hazas, M. (2022). Escaping Unsustainable Digital Interactions: Toward “More Meaningful” and “Moderate” Online Experiences. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 165, 102853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102853
Yildirim, M., Globa, A., Gocer, O., & Brambilla, A. (2024). Multisensory Nature Exposure in the Workplace: Exploring the Restorative Benefits of Smell Experiences. Building and Environment, 262, 111841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111841
Zhu, T., & Yang, Y. (2023). Research on Mobile Learning Platform Interface Design Based on College Students’ Visual Attention Characteristics. PLoS ONE, 18(7), e0283778. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283778
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Park Soo Jin, Jeong Ji Eun, Seo Kang Ho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
5.png)
