Designing with the Brain in Mind: A Neuroaesthetic Pedagogy Framework

Authors

  • Carlos Fernández University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Petra Nováková University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v4i1.3199

Keywords:

Neuroaesthetics, Design cognition, Neurodesign literacy, Visual empathy, Design-based research

Abstract

Contemporary graphic design education necessitates a deeper understanding of how aesthetic experience and cognitive processes shape creativity and empathetic comprehension in visual communication. Insights into how the brain perceptually and affectively interprets design can support the development of self-aware designers who respond more sensitively to human needs. Drawing on neuroaesthetics and design cognition, this study proposes an interdisciplinary approach that integrates creative pedagogy with the science of perception. This research introduces the Neuroaesthetic Pedagogy Framework (NPF) as an initial, exploratory framework that connects neurodesign principles with pedagogies of visual empathy and adopts an exploratory design-based research (DBR) methodology. Three iterative cycles were conducted as context-specific pedagogical interventions within a graphic design course, involving teaching experiments, reflective journals, and analyses of neuroaesthetic engagement. Thirty-eight undergraduate graphic design students participated over one semester, with observations focusing on cognitive and affective engagement in visual problem-solving activities. The findings suggest observable improvements in design cognition, particularly in visual reasoning and empathic decision-making, rather than statistically conclusive effects. The NPF indicates the potential to interconnect analytical and affective cognitive processes, supporting more emotionally informed design outcomes. This study concludes that the NPF demonstrates promise in bridging graphic design education and neuroscience by framing creative learning as an iterative process of aligning perception, cognition, and empathy, while highlighting the emerging importance of neuroaesthetic literacy in graphic design pedagogy.

References

Agustin, N., & Rahayu, S. (2025). The Role of Social Media as a Micro-Ecosystem in Supporting Community-Based E-Learning Platforms: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, 4(3), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtie.v4i3.445

Belfi, A. M., Vessel, E. A., Brielmann, A., Isik, A. I., Chatterjee, A., Leder, H., Pelli, D. G., & Starr, G. G. (2019). Dynamics of Aesthetic Experience are Reflected in the Default-Mode Network. NeuroImage, 188, 584–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.017

Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637

Buchner, J., Buntins, K., & Kerres, M. (2022). The Impact of Augmented Reality on Cognitive Load and Performance: A Systematic Review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.1261

Buçinca, Z., Malaya, M. B., & Gajos, K. Z. (2021). To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-Assisted Decision-Making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449287

Chatterjee, A., Coburn, A., & Weinberger, A. (2021). The Neuroaesthetics of Architectural Spaces. Cognitive Processing, 22, 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-021-01043-4

Cotter, K. N., Mahlobo, C. T., Smith, B., Niepold, S., Rizzo, A., & Pawelski, J. O. (2025). Examining the Ability of Digital Visual Art Engagement to Cultivate Empathy and Social Connection. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 43(2), 921–946. https://doi.org/10.1177/02762374241309878

Cross, N. (2001). Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793601750357196

Dietrich, P., & Knieper, T. (2022). (Neuro)Aesthetics: Beauty, Ugliness, and Ethics. PsyCh Journal, 11(5), 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.478

Donaldson, J. P., Han, A., Yan, S., Lee, S., & Kao, S. (2024). Learning Experience Network Analysis for Design-Based Research. Information and Learning Science, 125(1–2), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-03-2023-0026

Hoadley, C., & Campos, F. C. (2022). Design-Based Research: What It Is and Why It Matters to Studying Online Learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2079128

Hoadley, C., & Campos, F. C. (2022). Design-Based Research: What It is and Why It Matters to studying online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2079128

Lim, F. V. (2023). A Design-Based Research Approach to the Teaching and Learning of Multiliteracies. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(5), 641–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00683-0

Magsamen, S., Golden, T. L., Towriss, C. A., & Allen, J. (2023). The Impact Thinking Framework: A Process for Advancing Research-to-Practice Initiatives in Neuroaesthetics. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1129334. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129334

Malinova, M., & Mendling, J. (2021). Cognitive Diagram Understanding and Task Performance in Systems Analysis and Design. MIS Quarterly, 45(4), 2101–2158. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2021/15262

Miller, C. A., & Hübner, R. (2023). The Relations of Empathy and Gender to Aesthetic Response and Aesthetic Inference of Visual Artworks. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 41(1), 188–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/02762374221095701

Mundy, C. E., Potgieter, M., & Seery, M. K. (2023). A Design-Based Research Approach to Improving Pedagogy in the Teaching Laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 25(1), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3rp00134b

Nagi, E., & Nathalea, M. (2025). Trends and Research Directions in Graphic Design for Social Values and Cultural Identity: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Graphic Design, 3(2), 340–364. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i2.3101

Obczovsky, M., Bernsteiner, A., Haagen-Schützenhöfer, C., & Schubatzky, T. (2025). Systematizing Decisions in Design-Based Research: From Theory to Design. Science Education, 109(2), 523–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21915

Prabhath, S., Kulkarni, U., Lakshmi R, V., Patra, B., K, E., Prabhu, D. A., & Nayak, K. R. (2025). Visual Hermeneutics as a Tool to Introduce Empathy and Core Physician Attributes in Doctor-Patient Relationship for First-Year Medical Undergraduate Students. BMC Medical Education, 25(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06742-6

Prasetya, D., Utami, I. I. B., & Pertiwi, S. (2025). From Static To Sentient: Designing Emotionally Responsive Interfaces Using Affective Computing For UX Enhancement. International Journal of Graphic Design, 3(1), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i1.2811

Qiu, J., Li, J., Xu, Z., Huang, R., Wang, R., Wu, L., Wu, X., Yang, F., Zhang, Z., Leifer, L., & Liu, W. (2022). Are answers more important than questions? Planning an empathy design innovation course for young students. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2022) Integrating People and Intelligent Systems, February 22–24, 2022, Venice, Italy, 22. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe100972

Rosyida, H. F., Syafei, A., & Nuha, M. U. (2025). The Evolving Field of Graphic Design: Challenges and Opportunities in the Integration of Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Graphic Design, 3(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i1.2537

Song, Y., Liu, Y., Bai, X., & Yu, H. (2024). Effects of Neighborhood Built Environment on Cognitive Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review. BMC Geriatrics, 24(1), 194. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04776-x

Yunianto, I., & Wahyudi, W. (2024). Designing User Experience for a Mobile Application for Agricultural Product Marketing Using the Human-Centered Design Method. International Journal of Graphic Design, 2(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v2i2.2123

Zeki, S., Bao, Y., & Pöppel, E. (2025). Neuroaesthetics: The Art, Science, and Brain Triptychon. In Neuroaesthetics: The Art, Science, and Brain Triptychon, 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811298639_0001

Downloads

Published

2026-04-08

How to Cite

Designing with the Brain in Mind: A Neuroaesthetic Pedagogy Framework. (2026). International Journal of Graphic Design, 4(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v4i1.3199