AI-Assisted Mood Board Development: Enhancing Creative Ideation in Graphic Design Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v4i1.3214Keywords:
Mood Board, Artificial Intelligence, Design Education, IdeationAbstract
This study examines how integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into mood board development enhances the ideation process in graphic design education. The research aimed to understand how AI-supported visual exploration influences students’ originality, complexity, and goal alignment during creative concept development. A mixed-method approach was employed, combining quantitative rubric-based evaluation of student mood boards with qualitative thematic analysis of interviews and classroom observations to capture both performance outcomes and design thinking processes. The findings show that AI tools expanded visual exploration and improved conceptual clarity, yet their effectiveness depended on how critically students engaged with prompt iteration and keyword synthesis. Students who refined descriptive keywords and combined AI outputs with digital imaging achieved higher originality and coherence. Complexity increased when students generated multiple AI iterations from different visual angles, whereas goal alignment benefited from structured mind mapping informed by tone and manner. Qualitative results revealed six interrelated themes: idea exploration, AI assistance, visual curation, AI limitations, ethics and reflection, and implementation recommendations, highlighting the interplay between human judgment and computational generation. Overall, the study affirms that mood board development remains essential in guiding conceptual direction and visual storytelling in design education. AI serves as a creative collaborator that supports deeper ideation and expands the boundaries of visual experimentation in contemporary design learning.
References
Anggarini, A., & Pramesti, R. D. (2025). Pengembangan Metode Kreatif Integrasi Mind Map dan Mood Board dalam Pemecahan Masalah Desain Grafis. ANDHARUPA: Jurnal Desain Komunikasi Visual & Multimedia, 11(1), 835–854. https://doi.org/10.33633/andharupa.v11i1.11677
Anggarini, A., & Maheni, M. T. (2022). Model Penggunaan Mind Map dan Mood Board untuk Pengembangan Konsep dalam Proses Desain Grafis. Penelitian internal, Politeknik Negeri Jakarta. https://sinta.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/authors/profile/6035868
Berni, A., Borgianni, Y., Rotini, F., Gonçalves, M., & Thoring, K. (2024). Stimulating Design Ideation with Artificial Intelligence: Present and (Short-Term) Future. Proceedings of the Design Society, 4, 1939–1948. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2024.196
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brisco, R., Hay, L., & Dhami, S. (2023). Exploring the Role of Text-to-Image AI in Concept Generation. Proceedings of the Design Society, 3, 1835–1844. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.184
Cassidy, T. (2011). The Mood Board Process Modeled and Understood as a Qualitative Design Research Tool. Fashion Practice, 3(2), 225–251. https://doi.org/10.2752/175693811x13080607764854
Cassidy, T. D. (2008). Mood Boards: Current Practice in Learning and Teaching Strategies and Students’ Understanding of the Process. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 1(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543260802015154
Choi, D., Hong, S., Park, J., Chung, J. J. Y., & Kim, J. (2024). CreativeConnect: Supporting Reference Recombination for Graphic Design Ideation with Generative AI. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’24, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642794
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01798-2
Divyadharshini, P., Princi, R., Subashini, G., & Moohambgai, B. (2025). Virtual Reality in Adaptive Learning: Identifying Learning Styles and Integration in Educational Apps. Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, 4(2), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtie.v4i2.268
Dorst, K. (2019). Co-Evolution and Emergence in Design. Design Studies, 65, 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.005
Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-Evolution of Problem–Solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(01)00009-6
Endrissat, N., Islam, G., & Noppeney, C. (2016). Visual Organizing: Balancing Coordination and Creative Freedom via Mood Boards. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2353–2362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.004
Koch, J., Taffin, N., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Laine, M., Lucero, A., & Mackay, W. E. (2020). ImageSense: An Intelligent Collaborative Ideation Tool to Support Diverse Human-Computer Partnerships. Proceedings of the Acm on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392850
Koch, J., Taffin, N., Lucero, A., & Mackay, W. E. (2020). SemanticCollage: Enriching Digital Mood Board Design with Semantic Labels. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395494
Lucero, A. (2012). Framing, Aligning, Paradoxing, Abstracting, and Directing: How Design Mood Boards Work. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS ’12, 438–447. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318021
Munk, J. E., Sørensen, J. S., & Laursen, L. N. (2020). Visual Boards: Mood Board, Style Board or Concept Board? In DS 104: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2020). https://doi.org/10.35199/epde.2020.47
Oxman, R. (2004). Think-maps: Teaching Design Thinking in Design Education. Design Studies, 25(1), 63–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(03)00033-4
Prasetya, D., Utami, I. I. B., & Pertiwi, S. (2025). From Static to Sentient: Designing Emotionally Responsive Interfaces Using Affective Computing for UX Enhancement. International Journal of Graphic Design, 3(1), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i1.2811
Rosyida, H. F., Syafei, A., & Nuha, M. U. (2025). The Evolving Field of Graphic Design: Challenges and Opportunities in the Integration of Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Graphic Design, 3(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i1.2537
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
Schetinger, V., Di Bartolomeo, S., El‐Assady, M., McNutt, A., Miller, M., Passos, J. P. A., & Adams, J. L. (2023). Doom or Deliciousness: Challenges and Opportunities for Visualization in the Age of Generative Models. Computer Graphics Forum, 42(3), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14841
Sivaranjani, S., & S, N. H. (2025). Transforming Fraud Detection in Banking with Explainable AI: Enhancing Transparency and Trust. Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, 4(2), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtie.v4i2.267
Sudha, S., & Nafeeza, S. (2025). Predicting and Inspecting Food Contamination Using AI based Hyperspectral Imaging. Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, 4(2), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtie.v4i2.266
Sugiarto, S., & Sultana, M. (2025). Critical Speculations In AI Design: Ethical Narratives And Visual Experiments In Post-Human Aesthetic Practices. International Journal of Graphic Design, 3(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i1.2873
Yvier, E., & Eizstvkov, T. (2025). Technological Trends In Digital And Interactive Media For Heritage Design: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Graphic Design, 3(2), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i2.3100
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anggi Anggarini, Rachmadita Dwi Pramesti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
5.png)
