Innovation Capability Gap in Design Practice: Uncovering Organizational Constraints
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v4i2.3646Keywords:
Design Practice, Innovation Activation, Innovation Capability Gap, Organizational Constraints, System-Centric InnovationAbstract
The potential of design professionals to drive innovation is often constrained by organizational environments, creating a gap between embedded innovation capability and its practical activation. This study develops a conceptual model to explore how organizational constraints may affect the activation of innovation capability and its translation into innovation outcomes within design practice. A descriptive conceptual approach was employed, integrating a critical analytical essay, a comparative analysis of idealized versus constraint-driven design practice, and an illustrative case simulation using hypothetical profiles and dummy data. The simulation was designed to illustrate the model's underlying logic under specified assumptions rather than to measure actual organizational conditions or establish empirical relationships. The conceptual analysis suggests that structural rigidities, risk-averse cultural norms, and centralized decision-making may constrain the translation of design capability into innovation outcomes. The illustrative simulation demonstrates how these assumed constraints could influence innovation-related processes within the proposed framework; however, the simulated patterns should not be interpreted as evidence of actual organizational behavior. This study reframes innovation discourse from an individual-centric to a system-centric perspective by introducing an activation-based view, which conceptually distinguishes the availability of individual capability from the organizational conditions that may enable or restrict its application. The proposed framework offers a conceptual diagnostic lens for examining potential barriers to innovation in design practice, including creative studio workflows, visual communication development, design revision processes, and approval procedures. It provides a basis for further empirical investigation into how organizational conditions may shape the relationship between design capability and innovation outcomes.
References
Acar, O., Tarakci, M., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2018). Creativity and Innovation Under Constraints: A Cross-Disciplinary Integrative Review. Journal of Management, 45, 121–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318805832
Akram, T., Lei, S., Haider, M. J., & Hussain, S. T. (2020). The impact of organizational justice on employee innovative work behavior: Mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.10.001
Alonso, A. D., Kok, S., Bressan, A., & O’Shea, M. (2021). Knowledge management and the business development journey: a knowledge-based view among micro firms. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 20, 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2021.1919575
AlTaweel, I., & Al-Hawary, S. (2021). The Mediating Role of Innovation Capability on the Relationship between Strategic Agility and Organizational Performance. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147564
Auernhammer, J., & Roth, B. (2021). The Origin and Evolution of Stanford University’s Design Thinking: From Product Design to Design Thinking in Innovation Management. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12594
Bocken, N., & Geradts, T. (2020). Barriers and drivers to sustainable business model innovation: Organization design and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 53, 101950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101950
Daronco, E. L., Silva, D., Seibel, M. K., & Cortimiglia, M. (2022). A new framework of firm-level innovation capability: A propensity–ability perspective. European Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.02.002
Grant, R., & Phene, A. (2021). The knowledge based view and global strategy: Past impact and future potential. Global Strategy Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1399
Haile, E. A. (2022). Organizational learning capability and its impact on organizational innovation. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjie-03-2022-0015
Hueske, A.-K., & Guenther, E. (2015). What hampers innovation? External stakeholders, the organization, groups and individuals: a systematic review of empirical barrier research. Management Review Quarterly, 65, 113–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-014-0109-5
Hughes, D., Lee, A., Tian, A., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.001
Ivaldi, S., Scaratti, G., & Fregnan, E. (2021). Dwelling within the fourth industrial revolution: organizational learning for new competences, processes and work cultures. Journal of Workplace Learning. https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-07-2020-0127
Jansson, G., Viklund, E., & Olofsson, T. (2018). Artistic and Engineering Design of Platform-Based Production Systems: A Study of Swedish Architectural Practice. Buildings, 8, 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8020034
Khan, M. A., Ismail, F., Hussain, A., & Alghazali, B. (2020). The Interplay of Leadership Styles, Innovative Work Behavior, Organizational Culture, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. SAGE Open, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019898264
Kohli, R., & Melville, N. (2019). Digital innovation: A review and synthesis. Information Systems Journal, 29, 200–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12193
Lam, L., Nguyen, P., Le, N., & Tran, K. (2021). The Relation among Organizational Culture, Knowledge Management, and Innovation Capability: Its Implication for Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010066
Le, P., & Lei, H. (2019). Determinants of innovation capability: the roles of transformational leadership, knowledge sharing and perceived organizational support. J. Knowl. Manag., 23, 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-09-2018-0568
Liedtka, J. (2015). Perspective: Linking Design Thinking with Innovation Outcomes through Cognitive Bias Reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32, 925–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12163
Magistretti, S., Ardito, L., & Petruzzelli, A. M. (2021). Framing the Microfoundations of Design Thinking as a Dynamic Capability for Innovation: Reconciling Theory and Practice. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12586
Mendoza-Silva, A. (2020). Innovation capability: a systematic literature review. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-09-2019-0263
Rodet, C. (2021). Experiments on Creativity and Optimal Work Design. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3647303
Sancho-Zamora, R., Hernández-Perlines, F., Peña-García, I., & Gutiérrez-Broncano, S. (2022). The Impact of Absorptive Capacity on Innovation: The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020842
Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., Heijden, B., & Farrell, M. (2017). Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.02.004
Våland, M. S., Svejenova, S., & Clausen, R. (2021). Renewing creative work for business innovation: Architectural practice in the trading zone. European Management Review, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12464
Verganti, R., Vendraminelli, L., & Iansiti, M. (2020). Innovation and Design in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12523
Watson, R., Wilson, H., Smart, P., & Macdonald, E. (2018). Harnessing Difference: A Capability‐Based Framework for Stakeholder Engagement in Environmental Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35, 254–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12394
Yun, J., Zhao, X., Jung, K., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2020). The Culture for Open Innovation Dynamics. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125076
Zhen, Z., Yousaf, Z., Radulescu, M., & Yasir, M. (2021). Nexus of Digital Organizational Culture, Capabilities, Organizational Readiness, and Innovation: Investigation of SMEs Operating in the Digital Economy. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020720
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yuli Fitrianto, Ahmad Zainudin, Tiffany Song, Reza Prabowo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
5.png)
