Computer-Vision-Informed Visual Explanation Cards for Autonomous-Driving Traffic-Sign Alerts: Localization, Classification, and Retrieved Evidence on GTSDB
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i2.3991Keywords:
traffic-sign detection, autonomous driving, computer vision, visual explanation, graphic designAbstract
This paper develops a computer-vision-informed visual explanation card for traffic-sign alerts in autonomous-driving and driver-assistance interfaces. The card organizes a detected sign crop, predicted class, confidence, default semantic display-priority tier, retrieved visual precedents, scene-location cue, and concise action prompt. The empirical study uses the complete German Traffic Sign Detection Benchmark (GTSDB), comprising 900 road scenes in the standard 600-scene development and 300-scene evaluation portions. The same scenes support localization, crop classification, retrieval, calibration, and end-to-end analysis. The first 600 scenes were divided at the scene level into training and validation subsets; the 300 evaluation scenes were held out until model choices, retrieval depth, fusion weight, and detector threshold had been fixed. A learned class-agnostic localizer filters color-connected-component proposals with a histogram-of-oriented-gradients and color classifier. Five crop classifiers and four nearest-neighbor settings were evaluated, with retrieval treated primarily as example-based explanation support. On the held-out scenes, the selected localizer achieved an AP at IoU 0.50 of 0.211, an AP averaged over IoU 0.50–0.95 of 0.098, and a recall of 0.260 at the validation-selected operating point. The selected crop classifier achieved 0.784 accuracy and 0.574 macro-F1 on ground-truth crops. With predicted crops, correct-class end-to-end coverage was 0.177, and correct-tier end-to-end coverage was 0.244. These results define the information that the proposed card can receive from the evaluated vision pipeline. They do not measure driver comprehension, glance behavior, response time, trust, usability, or deployment safety, which require separate human-centred evaluation.
References
Aamodt, A., & Plaza, E. (1994). Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Communications, 7(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-1994-7104
Amershi, S., Weld, D., Vorvoreanu, M., Fourney, A., Nushi, B., Collisson, P., Suh, J., Iqbal, S. T., Bennett, P. N., Inkpen, K., Teevan, J., Kikin-Gil, R., & Horvitz, E. (2019). Guidelines for human-AI interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–13). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233
Ben-Bassat, T., & Shinar, D. (2006). Ergonomic guidelines for traffic sign design increase sign comprehension. Human Factors, 48(1), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872006776412298
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
Campbell, J. L., Brown, J. L., Graving, J. S., Richard, C. M., Lichty, M. G., Sanquist, T., Bacon, L. P., Woods, R., Li, H., Williams, D. N., & Morgan, J. F. (2016). Human factors design guidance for driver-vehicle interfaces (Report No. DOT HS 812 360). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/812360_humanfactorsdesignguidance.pdf
Chen, C., Li, O., Tao, D., Barnett, A., Rudin, C., & Su, J. K. (2019). This looks like that: Deep learning for interpretable image recognition. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 8930–8941. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/hash/adf7ee2dcf142b0e11888e72b43fcb75-Abstract.html
Chen, Y., & Li, M. (2025). From hand-drawn sketches to interactive web prototypes: A reproducible vision-language approach with structural and visual consistency evaluation. Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, 4(2), 364–384. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtie.v4i2.490
Chen, Y., & Xu, H. (2026). Trust-calibrated multilingual RAG for humanitarian information platforms: Empirical evaluation on OMoS-QA for migration information access. International Journal of Graphic Design, 4(1), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v4i1.3552
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20(3), 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005). Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Vol. 1, pp. 886–893). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2005.177
Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32–64. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017). On calibration of modern neural networks. In D. Precup & Y. W. Teh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (Vol. 70, pp. 1321–1330). PMLR. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/guo17a.html
Houben, S., Stallkamp, J., Salmen, J., Schlipsing, M., & Igel, C. (2013). Detection of traffic signs in real-world images: The German Traffic Sign Detection Benchmark. In 2013 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2013.6706807
International Organization for Standardization. (2021). Road vehicles—Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems (TICS)—Procedures for determining priority of on-board messages presented to drivers (ISO/TS 16951:2021). https://www.iso.org/standard/81103.html
Jin, J. (2025a). Evidence-chain reliable RAG: Hallucination detection, source attribution, and deterministic provenance explanations. Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, 4(2), 520–533. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtie.v4i2.535
Jin, J. (2025b). LLM-style evidence cards for scientific search interfaces: A UI/UX design framework for retrieval transparency, ranking trust, and visual evidence hierarchy. International Journal of Graphic Design, 3(2), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i2.3698
Kim, B., Khanna, R., & Koyejo, O. O. (2016). Examples are not enough, learn to criticize! Criticism for interpretability. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 29, 2280–2288. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2016/hash/5680522b8e2bb01943234bce7bf84534-Abstract.html
Koo, J., Kwac, J., Ju, W., Steinert, M., Leifer, L., & Nass, C. (2015). Why did my car just do that? Explaining semi-autonomous driving actions to improve driver understanding, trust, and performance. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 9, 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-014-0227-2
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392
Li, C., Zhou, B., & Gao, K. (2025). Risk-calibrated patient-facing AI safety cards: A UI/UX benchmark for explainable medical AI response interfaces. International Journal of Graphic Design, 3(2), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i2.3709
Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2014). Microsoft COCO: Common objects in context. In D. Fleet, T. Pajdla, B. Schiele, & T. Tuytelaars (Eds.), Computer vision—ECCV 2014 (pp. 740–755). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48
Mendez, L., & Okafor, S. (2026). Adaptive Graphic Interaction Model: A Mixed-Method Framework for Future Factory Design. International Journal of Graphic Design, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.51903/IJGD.V4I1.3194
Munzner, T. (2014). Visualization analysis and design. CRC Press.
Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things (Rev. and expanded ed.). Basic Books.
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., & Duchesnay, É. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830.
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). “Why should I trust you?”: Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 1135–1144). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778
Ware, C. (2012). Information visualization: Perception for design (3rd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.
Wickens, C. D., Lee, J. D., Liu, Y., & Gordon-Becker, S. E. (2004). An introduction to human factors engineering (2nd ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Wogalter, M. S. (Ed.). (2006). Handbook of warnings. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Xin, Q. (2025). Uncertainty-aware late fusion for 3D perception (confidence calibration + fusion rule learning). Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, 4(1), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtie.v4i1.485
Xin, Q. (2026). LiDAR–camera object-level fusion for multi-target tracking using JPDA and EKF: A reproducible empirical study on a PandaSet-parameterised five-sequence dataset. Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, 5(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtie.v5i1.486
Xu, H., Chen, Y., & Med, A. (2025). Automatic detection and explanation of dark patterns from interface microcopy: Empirical comparison of BERT-style encoders, RoBERTa-style encoders, and LLM-style decoders on the ec-darkpattern dataset. Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, 4(3), 590–612. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtie.v4i3.491
Zhang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2025a). A therapist-facing session copilot for live counseling support: Reasoning-guided retrieval and ranking from multi-turn counseling dialogues. Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, 4(2), 464–486. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtie.v4i2.547
Zhang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2025b). Visualizing the right counseling support: Evidence-linked recommendation cards for explainable mental health intake interfaces. International Journal of Graphic Design, 3(1), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i1.3722
Zhou, B., Jin, J., & Zhao, D. (2025). Calibrated resume-job matching for trustworthy LLM-assisted recruiter screening: Pairwise matching, probability calibration, and selective refusal on two public recruitment datasets. Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, 4(3), 625–648. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtie.v4i3.529
Zhou, B., Li, C., & Liu, L. (2025). Risk-calibrated patient-facing AI safety cards: A UI/UX design framework for rubric-based medical risk communication. International Journal of Graphic Design, 3(2), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i2.3696
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ruiyan Ma, Long Zhang, Tiffany Song

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









5.png)
