From 8-K to Deal Cards: A Source-Grounded Visual Triage Framework for FinTech M&A Filings

Authors

  • Sisi Meng Accounting, University of Rochester, NY, USA
  • Dingyuan Zhang Business Analytics, University of Rochester, NY, USA
  • Eric Li Applied Analytics, Columbia University, NY, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v4i1.4001

Keywords:

FinTech, mergers and acquisitions, Form 8-K, information visualization, visual triage

Abstract

Form 8-K is a timely public channel through which U.S. registrants disclose material events, including acquisition agreements, completed transactions, shareholder communications, and related exhibits. The density of this filing stream creates a visual communication problem: analysts need to identify source-linked deal cues without losing the legal and temporal provenance of each record. This study presents a source-grounded deal-card workflow for FinTech M&A filing triage. The analysis used the official SEC quarterly master indexes and included 16,439 Form 8-K and 8-K/A filings in Q4 2025, together with 276,261 contextual records in the complete Q4 index. Symmetric companion-form windows were protected against quarter-boundary truncation with the last 14 days of Q3 2025 and the first 14 days of Q1 2026. A seven-day window identified 222 rule-defined FinTech M&A targets across 94 company names, or 1.35% of the Q4 corpus. In five-fold cross-validation grouped by CIK, text-only logistic triage reached F1 = 0.224 and M&A-context logistic triage reached F1 = 0.322. Integrated logistic and linear SVM configurations reproduced the rule-defined target exactly (F1 = 1.000). Because the target was constructed from the same FinTech and M&A-neighborhood cues available to those configurations, this exact agreement is interpreted as rule-consistency validation rather than predictive superiority. A structural interface audit found that the deal-card schema exposed 10 documented fields, nine visual anchors, and six configured decision cues. These author-defined attributes describe interface structure; they do not measure comprehension, trust, or review speed. The contribution is a method for organizing SEC filing evidence for subsequent visual review.

References

Araci, D. (2019). FinBERT: Financial sentiment analysis with pre-trained language models [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1908.10063

Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D. M., Wu, J., Winter, C., … Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M. F. Balcan, & H. Lin (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901). Curran Associates, Inc. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Abstract.html

Cairo, A. (2016). The truthful art: Data, charts, and maps for communication. New Riders.

Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D., & Shneiderman, B. (Eds.). (1999). Readings in information visualization: Using vision to think. Morgan Kaufmann.

Chen, Y., & Xu, H. (2026). Trust-calibrated multilingual RAG for humanitarian information platforms: Empirical evaluation on OMoS-QA for migration information access. International Journal of Graphic Design, 4(1), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v4i1.3552

Chen, Y., Zhou, S., & Lin, E. (2025). Accounting-aware evidence retrieval for institutional due diligence of tokenized trade receivable RWA. Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, 4(3), 649–663. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtie.v4i3.542

Elena, S., & Alexander, L. (2026). Simulating Sustainable Color-Form Decisions in AI-Driven Eco-Brand Identity Design. International Journal of Graphic Design, 4(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.51903/IJGD.V4I1.3313

Few, S. (2006). Information dashboard design: The effective visual communication of data. O'Reilly Media.

Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N. J., Kern, R., Picus, M., Hoyer, S., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Brett, M., Haldane, A., del Río, J. F., Wiebe, M., Peterson, P., … Oliphant, T. E. (2020). Array programming with NumPy. Nature, 585, 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

Heer, J., Bostock, M., & Ogievetsky, V. (2010). A tour through the visualization zoo. Communications of the ACM, 53(6), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1145/1743546.1743567

Hullman, J., & Diakopoulos, N. (2011). Visualization rhetoric: Framing effects in narrative visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12), 2231–2240. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.255

Hunter, J. D. (2007). Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Computing in Science & Engineering, 9(3), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., Ishii, E., Bang, Y. J., Madotto, A., & Fung, P. (2023). Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(12), Article 248. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571730

Jin, J. (2025a). Evidence-chain reliable RAG: Hallucination detection, source attribution, and deterministic provenance explanations. Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, 4(2), 520–533. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtie.v4i2.535

Jin, J. (2025b). LLM-style evidence cards for scientific search interfaces: A UI/UX design framework for retrieval transparency, ranking trust, and visual evidence hierarchy. International Journal of Graphic Design, 3(2), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i2.3698

Lerman, A., & Livnat, J. (2010). The new Form 8-K disclosures. Review of Accounting Studies, 15(4), 752–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-009-9114-7

Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., Küttler, H., Lewis, M., Yih, W.-t., Rocktäschel, T., Riedel, S., & Kiela, D. (2020). Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M. F. Balcan, & H. Lin (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 33, pp. 9459–9474). Curran Associates, Inc. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/6b493230205f780e1bc26945df7481e5-Abstract.html

Li, C., Bai, J., & Wang, S. (2024). Evidence-chain reliable RAG: Word-level hallucination detection, source attribution, and provenance explanation for LLM applications. Journal of Advanced Computing Systems, 4(2), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.69987/JACS.2024.40207

Li, C., Su, W., & Zhang, E. (2023). Lightweight hallucination firewall for enterprise LLM applications: Evidence consistency, self-checking, and small-model detection on TruthfulQA. Journal of Advanced Computing Systems, 3(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.69987/JACS.2023.30104

Li, F. (2008). Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2–3), 221–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.02.003

Li, Y., Lu, S., & Zhao, L. (2025). LLM-as-design-critic: Aligning AI-generated UI feedback with human graphic design judgment. International Journal of Graphic Design, 3(1), 196–215. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i1.3661

Li, Z., Zhang, K., & Wong, A. (2026). Numerical-reasoning guardrails for a quant research assistant: A compact reproducible benchmark using SEC and FRED data. Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, 5(2), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtie.v5i2.541

Li, Z., Zhou, S., & Zhou, Z. (2025). Financial risk dashboard design for institutional RWA investors: Visual hierarchy, chart comprehension, and explainability in FinChart-Bench. International Journal of Graphic Design, 3(1), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i1.3715

Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2011). When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. The Journal of Finance, 66(1), 35–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01625.x

McKinney, W. (2010). Data structures for statistical computing in Python. In S. van der Walt & J. Millman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference (pp. 56–61). https://doi.org/10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a

McMullin, J. L., Miller, B. P., & Twedt, B. J. (2019). Increased mandated disclosure frequency and price formation: Evidence from the 8-K expansion regulation. Review of Accounting Studies, 24(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-018-9462-2

Meng, S., Chen, J., & Zheng, I. (2026). LLM-inspired offline reranking for financial search: Query rewriting, hybrid retrieval, and listwise relevance ranking on FiQA. Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, 5(1), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtie.v5i1.537

Mu, J., Lu, Y., & Hwang, E. (2026). Structured visual brief interfaces for advertising design: A UI/UX framework for turning creative intentions into designer-editable graphic design cards. International Journal of Graphic Design, 4(1), 192–208. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v4i1.3702

Munzner, T. (2014). Visualization analysis and design. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17511

Nielsen, J. (1994). Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In B. Adelson, S. Dumais, & J. Olson (Eds.), CHI '94: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 152–158). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191729

Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., & Duchesnay, É. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12(85), 2825–2830. https://jmlr.org/papers/v12/pedregosa11a.html

Shneiderman, B. (1996). The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages (pp. 336–343). IEEE Computer Society Press. https://doi.org/10.1109/VL.1996.545307

Su, W., Chen, S., & Zhao, C. (2025). Budgeted multi-hop retrieval agent for compositional question answering: A retrieval-policy evaluation on the official MultiHop-RAG benchmark. Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, 4(3), 649–662. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtie.v4i3.543

Su, W., Rao, H., & Ma, E. (2026). Privacy and data-integrity risk cards for LLM agents: A UI/UX design framework for secure human oversight under prompt-injection attacks. International Journal of Graphic Design, 4(1), 186–191. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v4i1.3699

Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information (2nd ed.). Graphics Press.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2026). EDGAR full-index archive [Data set]. Retrieved July 23, 2026, from https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/full-index/

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2024a, June 6). EDGAR application programming interfaces (APIs). https://www.sec.gov/search-filings/edgar-application-programming-interfaces

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2024b, June 24). Exchange Act Form 8-K. https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/staff-guidance/compliance-disclosure-interpretations/exchange-act-form-8-k

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2025). Form 8-K. https://www.sec.gov/files/form8-k.pdf

Ware, C. (2012). Information visualization: Perception for design (3rd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.

Wu, Q., Bai, J., & Zhou, X. (2023). Evidence-grounded financial RAG: Reducing numerical hallucination in LLM-generated corporate risk memos. Journal of Advanced Computing Systems, 3(3), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.69987/JACS.2023.30306

Wu, Q., Meng, S., & Zhao, J. (2025). Text-grounded LLM-assisted design rationale interfaces: Turning advertising layout metadata into explainable UI/UX decision cards. International Journal of Graphic Design, 3(1), 216–240. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i1.3713

Wu, S., Irsoy, O., Lu, S., Dabravolski, V., Dredze, M., Gehrmann, S., Kambadur, P., Rosenberg, D., & Mann, G. (2023). BloombergGPT: A large language model for finance [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.17564

Xin, Q. (2026a). Explainable and fair credit risk scoring with counterfactual explanations: A reproducible evaluation on the German Credit dataset (HELOC-motivated). J-INTECH (Journal of Information and Technology), 14(2), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.32664/j-intech.v14i02.2228

Xin, Q. (2026b). Self-supervised customer representation learning for segmentation and next-purchase prediction on UCI Online Retail. J-INTECH (Journal of Information and Technology), 14(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.32664/j-intech.v14i01.2229

Yang, H., Liu, X.-Y., & Wang, C. D. (2023). FinGPT: Open-source financial large language models [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.06031

Zhang, K., Chen, Y., & Qian, A. (2025). Evidence-grounded accounting disclosure review cards: A visual communication framework for LLM-style explanations over SEC financial statements and notes. International Journal of Graphic Design, 3(2), 395. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i2.3710

Zhang, K., Meng, S., & Zhou, E. (2023). Evidence-grounded trading desk risk memos over SEC filings: Retrieval-augmented generation with XBRL numeric verification. Journal of Advanced Computing Systems, 3(2), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.69987/JACS.2023.30205

Zhong, Z. S., Chen, J., Zhong, E., & Sun, X. (2025). Evidence-calibrated RAG for unanswerable question answering: Retrieval coverage, abstention calibration, and hallucination-proxy analysis on SQuAD 2.0. Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, 4(2), 502–520. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtie.v4i2.536

Zhong, Z. S., Li, C., & Rao, H. (2026). Trajectory reliability prediction for generalist AI agents: Tool-use failure analysis and success forecasting on ZClawBench. Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering, 5(1), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.51903/jtie.v5i1.539

Zhong, Z. S., Wu, Q., & Mi, G. (2025). Uncertainty-aware medical image explanation cards: LLM-generated visual explanations for AI-assisted radiology interfaces. International Journal of Graphic Design, 3(2), 415–436. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v3i2.3616

Zhou, S., Li, Z., & Wang, E. (2023). Evidence-grounded RAG for tokenized trade receivable disclosure QA under U.S. capital market standards. Journal of Advanced Computing Systems, 3(7), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.69987/JACS.2023.30704

Zhou, S., Li, Z., & Wang, E. (2024). Long-document RAG for contractual and insurance clause analysis in receivables RWA structures. Journal of Advanced Computing Systems, 4(8), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.69987/JACS.2024.40810

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

From 8-K to Deal Cards: A Source-Grounded Visual Triage Framework for FinTech M&A Filings. (2026). International Journal of Graphic Design, 4(1), 246-265. https://doi.org/10.51903/ijgd.v4i1.4001