Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Perusahaan (Studi Kasus pada Sub Sektor Property dan Real Estate yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2019-2024)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/kompak.v18i2.3146Keywords:
Liquidity, Debt PolicyAbstract
This study aims to examine the effect of profitability, sales growth, and liquidity on debt policy in property and real estate companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2019–2024 period. The independent variables in this study include profitability, measured by Return on Assets (ROA); sales growth (SG); and liquidity, measured by the Current Ratio (CR). Meanwhile, the dependent variable is debt policy, measured by the Debt-to-Equity Ratio (DER). This study uses a quantitative approach, employing multiple linear regression analysis. The sample comprises 174 observational data points collected using purposive sampling. Testing was conducted using SPSS software, which includes the classical assumption test, the coefficient of determination test, the simultaneous test (F test), and the partial test (t test). The results show that profitability, sales growth, and liquidity simultaneously significantly affect debt policy. Partially, profitability tends to be positive, sales growth tends to be negative but not significant with respect to debt policy, while liquidity has a simultaneous negative effect. Of the four hypotheses proposed, two were accepted, and two were rejected because the direction of the influence did not match the initial assumption, and the significance value was more than 0.05.
References
[1] M. H. Haiedar and S. Kholifah, “The Impact of Occupational Safety, Workload, and Compensation on Employee Job Satisfaction in the Mining Industry: A Case Study of PT BCKA,” J. Manag. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 587–598, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.51903/jmi.v4i1.53.
[2] M. Fathony and G. Sudirman, “Inventory System Development With Trend Moment Method For Optimization Warehouse Inventory Using Rfid Technology (Case Study at Pt. Jansen Indonesia),” J. Technol. Informatics Eng., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 01–17, May 2023, doi: 10.51903/jtie.v2i2.168.
[3] R. I. Handayani, A. Puspita, and R. K. Dewi, “UI/UX Design for PT. Mami Satu Berkarya Sales Website Using the Design Thinking Method,” J. Ilm. Sist. Inf., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 756–773, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.51903/3rgn3m96.
[4] T. L. Sha, “Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kebijakan Utang Perusahaan Manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia,” J. Ekon., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 159–174, 2018, doi: 10.24912/je.v23i2.366.
[5] Yanti and A. Cynthia, “Faktor – Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kebijakan Hutang Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di BEI,” J. Paradig. Akunt., vol. I, no. 2, pp. 335–343, 2019, doi: 10.24912/jpa.v1i2.5001.
[6] U. Mardiyati, G. N. Ahmad, and R. Putri, “Pengaruh Kebijakan Dividen, Kebijakan Hutang dan Profitabilitas terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Manufaktur Sektor Pertambangan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2009-2014,” J. Ris. Manaj. sains Indones., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://www.neliti.com/publications/200896/
[7] Aulia Rahma Khusnul Khotimah, Anggi Saktiya Pratiwi, Yeni Lestari Simbolon, Wildan Yudhanto, and Yacobo P. Sijabat, “Pengaruh Kebijakan Hutang dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan,” Wawasan J. Ilmu Manajemen, Ekon. dan Kewirausahaan, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 182–195, 2022, doi: 10.58192/wawasan.v1i1.339.
[8] A. Halim, Teori Ekonomi Makro. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.mitrawacanamedia.com/teori-ekonomi-makro-edisi-3
[9] S. Munawir, Analisa Laporan Keuangan, 4th ed. Liberty, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://elibrary.nusamandiri.ac.id/readbook/210920/analisa-laporan-keuangan.html
[10] E. Saputri and A. Febyansyah, “Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Profitabilitas, Leverage dan Komite Audit Terhadap Income Smoothing,” J. Ilm. Glob. Educ., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 2748–2761, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.nusantaraglobal.ac.id/index.php/jige/article/view/1435/2000
[11] I. S. Sari and N. Pradita, “Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Growth, Likuiditas, Risiko Bisnis dan Kepemilikan Manajerial Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2017-2020,” J. Ilm. Edunomika, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 222, 2021, doi: 10.29040/jie.v6i1.3760.
[12] V. Tarigan, D. S. Purba, and S. Martina, “Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Likuiditas dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang pada Perusahaan Pertambangan,” Owner, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 4291–4300, 2022, doi: 10.33395/owner.v6i4.1199.
[13] D. Wardana, “Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Kepemilikan Manajerial, dan Kebijakan Dividen Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang,” RISTANSI Ris. Akunt., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 173–188, 2021, doi: 10.32815/ristansi.v2i2.785.
[14] P. T. A. Boseke and L. Evinita, “Pengaruh Likuiditas dan Pertumbuhan Penjualan Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang (Studi pada Perusahaan Sektor Pertambangan yang Terdaftar di BEI Periode 2015 - 2019),” J. Akunt. Manad., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 188–197, 2022, doi: 10.53682/jaim.v3i2.3073.
[15] Susanti and M. L. Annisa, “Analisis Pengaruh Likuiditas dan Pertumbuhan Penjualan Terhadap Kebijakan Utang,” J. Serambi Ekon. dan Bisnis, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 24–32, 2024, doi: 10.32672/jseb.v7i1.7280.
[16] G. P. Dewi, Mutiara and E. Kusumawati, “Influence of Sales Growth, Profitability, Asset Structure, Company Size, and Free Cash Flow on Debt Policy,” Budapest Int. Res. Critics Inst. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 144–154, 2024, doi: 10.33258/birci.v3i4.1502.
[17] S. M. Saputri, W. Hariyanti, and Y. Harjito, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kebijakan Hutang,” Berk. Akunt. dan Keuang. Indones., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 83, 2020, doi: 10.20473/baki.v5i2.18332.
[18] W. B. Utami and Suprihati, “The Effect of Liquidity, Asset Structure and Profitability on Debt Policies of Trading Companies Listed on the IDX 2016-2019,” Int. J. Econ. Bus. Account. Res., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–23, 2021, doi: 10.29040/ijebar.v5i2.2426.
[19] R. K. Adha and Sugijanto, “Pengaruh Free Cash Flow, Struktur Aset dan Likuiditas Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Pada Perusahaan Properti dan Real Estate Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode Tahun 2017‑2019,” J. Sustain. Bus. Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 75–81, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.unipasby.ac.id/jsbr/article/download/5324/3744/16986
[20] A. Reski and E. Masdupi, “The Effect of Capital Structure on Profitability and Stock Returns in Property and Real Estate Companies Listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange 2015-2020,” Financ. Manag. Stud., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 75–89, 2024, doi: 10.24036/jkmk.v4i2.202.
[21] E. D. R. Amara, R. Mudjiyantu, N. Dirgantari, and A. ilma Hartikasari, “Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Penjualan, Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, Dan Struktur Aset Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang,” Rev. Appl. Account. Res., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1–20, 2023, doi: 10.30595/raar.v3i2.19658.
[22] C. W. Sun, Z. W. Chen, Z. G. He, P. J. Zhou, and S. J. Liu, “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have,” J. financ. econ., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 187–221, Apr. 1984, doi: 10.1007/s00792-002-0304-5.
[23] Nurkholik and K. Khasanah, “Pengaruh Free Cash Flow, Struktur Aset, Likuiditas, Profitabilitas, Pertumbuhan Penjualan, dan Risiko Bisnis Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang (Studi Empiris Perusahaan Sektor Industri Barang Konsumsi yang Terdaftar di BEI 2016-2020),” Din. Akuntansi, Keuang. dan Perbank., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2022, doi: 10.35315/dakp.v11i1.8948.
[24] D. R. Maresta, “Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, Ukuran Perusahaan, dan Pertumbuhan Penjualan Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Pada Perusahaan Sub Sektor Food and Beverage,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://eprints.universitasputrabangsa.ac.id/id/eprint/491/1/Jurnal Desta Ramayanti Maresta 165502588.pdf
[25] Chariri and I. Ghozali, Teori Akuntansi. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://penerbit.undip.ac.id/index.php/penerbit/catalog/book/339
[26] T. C. Wijayanti, “Analisis Keputusan Investasi dan Kebijakan Pendanaan terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Sektor Properti di Indonesia,” J. Ekon. dan Bisnis, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 1665–1676, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://j-economics.my.id/index.php/home/article/view/376
[27] I. Carolina and N. Bangun, “Pengaruh Asset Structure, Sales Growth Dan Company Growth Terhadap Debt Policy,” J. Paradig. Akunt., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1153–1161, 2024, doi: 10.24912/jpa.v6i3.31138.
[28] A. Supriadi, “Pengaruh Free Cash Flow, Sales Growth, Kebijakan Dividen pada Kebijakan Hutang Perusahaan Property yang Ada di Bursa Indonesia,” L. J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 167–186, 2022, doi: 10.47491/landjournal.v3i1.1756.
[29] I. K. A. W. Kusuma, P. Kepramareni, and N. L. G. Novitasari, “Pengaruh Likuiditas, Profitabilitas dan Risiko Bisnis Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang pada Perusahaan Manufaktur I,” Kumpul. Has. Ris. Mhs. Akunt., vol. 17, no. 1, p. 302, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://e-journal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/kharisma/article/view/539
[30] O. Yustanti and I. R. Fitriati, “Kebijakan Hutang Perusahaan Real Estate dan Property,” in Proceeding SENDIU, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi (STIE) Indonesia atau lembaga penyelenggara SENDIU 2021, 2021, pp. 229–237. [Online]. Available: https://www.unisbank.ac.id/ojs/index.php/sendi_u/article/view/8597/3370
[31] M. S. Lubis, A. O. Siburian, R. Cokro, and Y. A. Nasution, “Pengaruh Current Ratio, Total Asset Turnover, Debt to Equity Ratio, Net Profit Margin Terhadap Roa pada Perusahaan Property & Real Estate yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2019 - 2021,” J. Econ. Bussines Account., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 420–428, 2023, doi: 10.31539/costing.v7i1.6400.
[32] U. Unnuriyah and I. Septriana, “Pengaruh Likuiditas, Profitabilitas, dan Pertumbuhan Penjualan Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Food and Beverage yang Terdaftar di BEI),” ECONBANK J. Econ. Bank., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 87–96, 2021, doi: 10.35829/econbank.v3i2.180.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Savira Nur Aprilyanti, Rilla Gantino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
